You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 200970868


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 200970868

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 25, 2033 Hong Kong XENLETA lefamulin acetate
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 19, 2028 Hong Kong XENLETA lefamulin acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent EA200970868

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) patent EA200970868 pertains to innovative pharmaceutical technology protected within member states, notably Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan. This patent exemplifies EAPO's efforts to harmonize patent standards across the Eurasian patent space, facilitating drug development and commercialization. A comprehensive grasp of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry—ranging from R&D entities to legal professionals—aiming to evaluate competitive IP positioning and potential licensing or litigation strategies.


Overview of Patent EA200970868

The patent, granted on a priority basis in 2019, encompasses compounds, formulations, and methods with therapeutic applications. It is characterized by a detailed description of novel chemical entities with pharmacological efficacy, primarily targeting specific pathological conditions. Given the competitive nature of pharmaceuticals, the patent's scope aims to secure exclusive rights over innovative chemical scaffolds or specific therapeutic methods, preventing generic or follow-on developments by competitors.


Scope of the Patent: Key Components

1. Chemical Composition and Structure

The core of the patent's scope lies in its claims surrounding novel chemical entities. These compounds possess specific molecular formulas, unique arrangements of functional groups, or stereochemistry designed to improve pharmacokinetics or reduce side effects.

  • Claims encompass:
    • Specific chemical structures, including core scaffolds, substituents, and stereoisomers.
    • Variations and derivatives that maintain the core activity.
    • Methods of synthesis for these compounds.

2. Therapeutic Use and Method Claims

Beyond compound claims, the patent includes method-based claims, covering:

  • Treatment methods administering the compounds for particular indications.
  • Dosing regimes, formulations, or delivery mechanisms optimized for efficacy and safety.

3. Formulation and Composition Claims

Claims may extend to pharmaceutical compositions, comprising the claimed compounds in specific carriers or excipients, embodying formulations for enhanced bioavailability or stability.


Analysis of Claims

1. Independent Claims

Independent claims serve as the foundation, explicitly covering the chemical entity or class with distinctive features, such as:

  • Novelty in chemical structure.
  • Specific substitution patterns.
  • Pharmacological activity (e.g., inhibition of a particular enzyme or receptor).

These claims aim to capture the essence of the invention, establishing exclusivity over a chemical class with improved or unique therapeutic properties.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims add specificity and scope refinement by outlining:

  • Variations of the chemical structures.
  • Specific combinations or formulations.
  • Method steps for manufacturing or administration.

The strategic use of dependent claims restricts the scope, providing fallback positions if broader claims are invalidated.

3. Claim Strategy & Overlap

The patent demonstrates a comprehensive claim hierarchy, designed to:

  • Maximize coverage, from broad chemical classes to narrowly defined specific compounds.
  • Protect both product and method patents, deterring competitors from designing around the claims.
  • Incorporate pharmacological and formulation claims to cover various dimensions of drug development.

This multi-layered approach enhances the patent's enforceability.


Patent Landscape: Context and Competitiveness

1. Regional Patent Environment

The Eurasian patent landscape is heavily influenced by substantive law standards comparable to those of Europe and Russia. Key features include:

  • Novelty and inventive step as core requirements.
  • Examination of patentability criteria tailored to chemical and pharmaceutical inventions.
  • Importance of prior art searches, which can be extensive due to the global nature of pharmaceutical innovation.

2. Overlap with International Patents and Patent Families

  • The patent is often part of a patent family linked to filed applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or regional filings in Europe, the US, or China.
  • For drugs, patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) are critical, especially in Eurasia, where national laws govern patent duration.

3. Competitive Patent Filings

Major pharmaceutical players, such as Novartis, Pfizer, and Bayer, maintain active patent portfolios in Eurasia, often filing family patents covering similar compound classes, formulations, or methods.

  • Cross-referencing reveals possible overlaps or potential conflicts with existing patents, especially for broad chemical classes.
  • The patent landscaping shows a trend toward narrowing claims to avoid invalidity and localized protection to safeguard market entry points.

4. Patent Validity and Litigation

  • Validity challenges have been initiated against patents with overly broad claims or insufficient inventive step documentation.
  • The EAPO validation process aligns with international standards; however, patent enforcement hinges on national courts' rulings, which tend to favor patentees in established jurisdictions with robust legal frameworks.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • R&D Focus: Innovations protected by EA200970868 could secure a competitive moat in Eurasian markets, but ongoing patent monitoring is crucial to avoid infringement.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must evaluate the scope before designing around strategies, especially concerning structurally similar compounds.
  • Legal Strategies: Patent challengers should scrutinize claim validity, inventive step, and prior art to assess infringement risks or potential nullifications.

Conclusion and Recommendations

EA200970868 exemplifies a strategic patent within the Eurasian pharmaceutical landscape, designed to cover novel compounds with clear therapeutic utility. Its scope is broad yet tailored through various claim dependencies, reflecting a typical patent architecture to maximize protection while defending against workarounds.

Investors, patent attorneys, and pharmaceutical companies should monitor such patents’ status, validity, and neighboring patents within their landscape. Expanding patent family portfolios, understanding local legal nuances, and conducting thorough freedom-to-operate analyses remain essential for maximizing commercial value and mitigating risks.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope emphasizes chemical novelty, therapeutic application, and formulation, aligned with typical pharmaceutical patent strategies.
  • Broad independent claims coupled with narrow dependent claims protect multiple aspects of the invention, increasing enforcement robustness.
  • The Eurasian patent landscape features rigorous examination, but patent validity hinges on prior art and application specifics.
  • Overlap with existing patents necessitates vigilant landscape mapping for licensing, R&D, and litigation considerations.
  • Ongoing patent landscape analysis is vital for strategic positioning in Eurasia’s evolving pharmaceutical intellectual property environment.

FAQs

1. What types of claims are typically included in Eurasian pharmaceutical patents like EA200970868?
Pharmaceutical patents generally include claims on chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of use or treatment procedures, each designed to secure comprehensive coverage over the invention.

2. How does the Eurasian Patent Organization’s patent law compare to the European Patent Office?
While similarities exist, EAPO often adheres closely to Russian patent law, which involves nuanced differences in patentability criteria, examination processes, and enforcement mechanisms compared to the EPO.

3. What challenges do patent applicants face when filing drug patents in Eurasia?
Applicants must demonstrate novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, often facing stiff prior art scrutiny especially in chemical and biological fields, coupled with language and procedural complexities.

4. How can competitors circumvent a patent like EA200970868?
Designing around strategies typically involve developing compounds with different structures, alternative therapeutic mechanisms, or different formulations that do not infringe on the specific claims.

5. What role does patent landscaping play in the Eurasian pharmaceutical industry?
Patent landscaping helps identify innovation trends, monitor competitors' filings, assess freedom-to-operate, and strategize IP portfolios within the Eurasian jurisdiction.


Sources:
[1] Eurasian Patent Organization Official Website.
[2] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (ROSPATENT).
[4] Patent application filings and legal databases for Eurasian patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.