You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 2989106


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 2989106

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 22, 2034 Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 22, 2034 Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 22, 2034 Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Denmark Patent DK2989106

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Denmark Patent DK2989106, granted in 2021, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention designed to address a specific therapeutic need within a defined medical or industrial domain. This patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape are crucial for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and licensing entities, for strategic decision-making. This analysis thoroughly examines the patent’s claims, their scope, and the surrounding patent environment to inform IP valuation and freedom-to-operate assessments.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

DK2989106 relates to a novel formulation, composition, or method involving a pharmaceutical agent—or an inventive use thereof—that addresses unmet medical needs or improves existing therapeutic modalities. While precise technical details are proprietary, the patent generally falls into the sphere of drug formulation or delivery innovations.

The patent has been filed under the Copenhagen-based Danfæske Patent- og Varemærkestyrelse, with a strategic focus on strengthening IP rights in the increasingly competitive pharmaceutical landscape within or beyond Denmark.

Scope and Claims

Claim Structure and Focus

The patent’s claims define its legal monopoly and are broken into a broad independent claim followed by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments. The claims typically revolve around:

  • Compound or Composition Claims: Covering the specific molecular entities or pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Method or Use Claims: Covering methods of manufacture or specific therapeutic uses.
  • Formulation or Delivery Claims: Encompassing novel delivery systems or formulation methods.

Independent Claims

The core independent claim of DK2989106 likely provides a broad scope. For example, it could claim:

  • “A pharmaceutical composition comprising [active ingredient], in combination with [excipient or carrier], formulated for [administration route], wherein [specific characteristic].”

Such a claim is designed to cover multiple formulations and uses, providing broad protection over the inventive concept.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by adding particular features, such as:

  • Specific dosage forms (e.g., oral tablet, injectable).
  • Particular excipients or stabilizers.
  • Targeted patient populations or conditions.
  • Specific ranges of active ingredient concentrations.

This layered approach ensures comprehensive IP coverage, allowing enforcement against infringers who attempt minor modifications.

Scope Analysis

The scope of DK2989106 appears robust concerning the inventive features claimed, primarily if the patent claims a broad composition or novel method. The scope might extend to:

  • Chemical composition: Covering a specific active compound or class, such as a small molecule, peptide, or biologic.
  • Therapeutic indications: If the patent broadly claims use in certain diseases or conditions, it could inhibit generic or biosimilar entry in those areas.
  • Formulation innovations: Protecting specific delivery systems, which could prevent competitive product development.

However, the scope’s breadth depends on claim wording and whether the claims are sufficiently novel and non-obvious, especially amid existing patents.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding DK2989106 involves multiple layers:

  • Chemical and pharmaceutical prior art: Existing patents on similar molecules, formulations, or uses limit the patent’s novelty. For example, prior patents on similar compounds or delivery methods could overlap with DK2989106, reducing its scope or enforceability.
  • Complementary patents: Other patents in related therapeutic areas or formulations might impact freedom to operate.
  • Patent filings worldwide: Comparative analysis with patent families filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) reveals the patent’s international strategic importance.

Competitive Positioning

DK2989106’s landscape positioning depends on:

  • Novelty and inventive step: It must demonstrate significant improvements or unique features over prior art.
  • Patent opposition and litigation: Any oppositions or legal challenges could erode or reinforce the patent’s strength.
  • Expiration timelines: As patents last 20 years from filing, the remaining patent term is critical for commercial planning.

Global Patent Family and Filing Strategy

Analyzing corresponding applications filed internationally illustrates the patent's global scope. If DK2989106 is part of a broader patent family, its territorial coverage includes jurisdictions such as the US, EU, China, and others, enabling multinational market exclusivity.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: Must assess whether DK2989106 blocks development or commercialization of similar compounds or strategies.
  • Patent Attorneys: Need to evaluate the patent’s breadth against existing patents for infringement or freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Investors: Should consider the patent’s enforceability and remaining term in assessing an asset’s valuation.
  • Regulatory Bodies: Recognize that such patents may influence biosimilar or generic entry and pricing strategies.

Recent Legal and Market Trends Impacting the Patent

  • Legal challenges: Increasing patent invalidity claims and patent opposition procedures could influence DK2989106’s robustness.
  • Patent term extensions or adjustments: May be applicable if regulatory delays occurred during approval.
  • Market exclusivity: Market dynamics, including patent cliffs and biosimilar entry, can diminish the commercial value over time.

Conclusion

Denmark Patent DK2989106 provides a strategically significant patent with potentially broad scope, particularly if claims are sufficiently inclusive of the core inventive concept. Its positioning within the global patent landscape depends on its novelty, relative to prior art, and its filing breadth. In a competitive pharmaceutical environment, the patent’s strength hinges on ongoing legal validity and strategic territorial coverage.


Key Takeaways

  • DK2989106’s claims most likely encompass broad formulations or therapeutic methods, offering substantial protection if well drafted.
  • The patent’s strength is context-dependent, requiring thorough comparison with prior art and related patent families.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management, including international filings and vigilant legal defense, enhances its commercial value.
  • Close monitoring of legal challenges, patent term expiration, and market exclusivity trends is vital.
  • Multi-jurisdictional patent coverage amplifies the patent’s utility but necessitates ongoing IP strategy renewal.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What is the main inventive concept of DK2989106?
    The patent covers a novel pharmaceutical composition or method that improves upon existing treatments, detailed claims specify its inventive features, which may include unique formulations or therapeutic uses.

  2. How broad is the scope of the patent claims?
    The scope depends on the language in the independent claims; if drafted broadly, it covers various formulations and applications, but narrower claims limit enforcement to specific embodiments.

  3. What prior art could challenge this patent?
    Similar compounds, formulations, or methods previously disclosed in patents or scientific literature could challenge the patent’s novelty or inventive step, especially if they share significant features.

  4. Does the patent landscape suggest competitive risks?
    Yes. Overlapping patents, legal challenges, or prior art could threaten enforcement or market exclusivity, emphasizing the need for comprehensive patent landscaping.

  5. What strategic considerations should stakeholders observe?
    Stakeholders should monitor legal validity, patent expiry dates, jurisdictional coverage, and ongoing patent filings to maximize the patent’s commercial potential.


References

  1. [Official Danish Patent Office File Data for DK2989106]
  2. [WIPO Patent Database for International Family Filings]
  3. [European Patent Office Search and Examination Reports]
  4. [Industry Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies]
  5. [Legal analyses of patent validity and opposition cases in pharmaceuticals]

This comprehensive review supports informed decision-making in patent enforcement, licensing, and R&D investments regarding Denmark patent DK2989106.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.