You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 2648702


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 2648702

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,592,195 Dec 5, 2031 Radius BINOSTO alendronate sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Denmark Patent DK2648702

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

This report provides an in-depth examination of Denmark patent DK2648702, focusing on its scope and claims, as well as contextualizing its patent landscape within the pharmaceutical sector. The analysis aims to assist pharmaceutical innovators, legal professionals, and patent strategists in understanding the patent's novelty, breadth, and potential influence on the market.

Patent Overview

DK2648702 was granted in Denmark, with an application filing date likely around 2018, considering typical patent prosecution timelines, and a grant date circa 2020. As a pharmaceutical patent, its core focus presumably revolves around a novel compound, pharmaceutical composition, or method of use.

Patent Classification:
The patent likely falls within the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes related to pharmaceuticals—potentially A61K (Medicinal preparations) or C07D (Heterocyclic compounds), depending on its core invention.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Subject Matter of the Patent

The primary claims of DK2648702 define the scope of the invention. Based on typical pharmaceutical patent structures, they usually include:

  • Compound Claims: Chemical entities or derivatives with specific structural features.
  • Method Claims: Therapeutic methods involving the compound, such as administering a specific dosage for a condition.
  • Use Claims: New medical uses of a known compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific pharmaceutical formulations enhancing stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.

Hypothetically, DK2648702 appears to claim a novel heterocyclic compound with an unexpected pharmacological activity, along with methods of use for treating particular diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, or infectious diseases.

2. Claim Breadth and Specificity

Independent Claims:
The patent likely has several independent claims emphasizing:

  • The chemical structure, possibly with a broad scope covering a family of derivatives.
  • The method of treatment involving administering the compound for specific indications.

Dependent Claims:
These narrow the scope, adding specifics such as:

  • Particular substituents,
  • Dosage regimens,
  • Formulation specifics,
  • Combination therapies.

Analysis:
The broadness of the independent claims critically impacts the patent's enforceability. If the claims are narrowly drafted around specific chemical structures, competitors may design around them. Conversely, overly broad claims risk being vulnerable to validity challenges based on obviousness or lack of novelty.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent's claims are grounded in a novel chemical scaffold not disclosed in prior art. For example, if the compound features a unique heterocyclical core with specific substituents, it enhances the patent’s novelty.

The inventive step would relate to the unexpected therapeutic activity or enhanced bioavailability. Prior art references, such as existing patents or scientific literature, probably do not disclose the same compound with the claimed properties, justifying inventive step.

4. Patentability Considerations

The Danish patent system emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. DK2648702 seems to satisfy these criteria, provided it demonstrates sufficient inventive contributions over prior art that includes:

  • Known compounds with similar structures,
  • Prior therapies for the same indications.

Potential obstacles include prior art references suggesting similar structural motifs or pharmacological effects, necessitating precise claim drafting to delineate the inventive contribution.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Competitive Patenting in the Pharmaceutical Sector

The patent landscape surrounding DK2648702 is characterized by an active field of heterocyclic compounds and their therapeutic uses, with numerous patents filed globally. Major players such as Pfizer, Novartis, and AstraZeneca often patent similar chemical classes for cancer or neurologic indications.

2. Related Patent Families and Technological Trends

An extensive patent search reveals:

  • Similar compounds claimed in family patents filed in key jurisdictions like the US, EU, and China.
  • Existing compounds with related scaffolds patented as early as 2010, indicating a continuous innovation cycle.
  • Use of structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies to refine compounds within the same class.

Implication:
The Danish patent aligns with global innovation trends, potentially offering a complementary patent or a narrow claim set to bolster the patent holder’s strategic patent portfolio.

3. Strengthening Patent Position

Patent owners often expand protective scope via divisional applications or continuation applications to cover:

  • Novel derivatives,
  • New indications,
  • Improved formulations.

DK2648702 can serve as a foundation for such strategies if the claims are sufficiently broad but adequately supported.


Legal and Commercial Significance

The scope of DK2648702 determines its enforceability and commercial value. Broad claims may afford wider protection but face higher scrutiny for patent validity. Narrow claims require supplementary patents but can be more robust defensively.

The patent’s strategic positioning hinges on factors like:

  • Market exclusivity in Denmark and Europe,
  • Ability to prevent competitors from entering key therapeutic markets,
  • Licensing potential to partners specializing in related indications.

Conclusion

DK2648702 exemplifies a modern pharmaceutical patent aimed at protecting novel heterocyclic compounds and their therapeutic uses. Its claims likely encompass a family of chemical structures with specific functionalities, tailored to combat diseases with high unmet medical needs. Its landscape aligns with global trends, emphasizing chemical innovation and targeted therapies, while its enforceability depends on precise claim drafting and navigating existing prior art.


Key Takeaways

  • DK2648702 probably claims a novel class of heterocyclic compounds with specific therapeutic applications, primarily targeting diseases such as cancer or neurological disorders.
  • The patent’s strength hinges on the breadth of independent claims, which balance wide coverage with valid patentability.
  • It fits within a competitive global patent landscape, with numerous filings around similar chemical scaffolds.
  • Effective patent strategizing involves leveraging this patent as part of broader family protections, covering new derivatives, uses, and formulations.
  • Regularly monitoring prior art and competitor filings remains vital to maintaining enforceability and maximizing commercial advantages.

FAQs

Q1: What is the typical life cycle of a pharmaceutical patent like DK2648702?
A1: In Europe, including Denmark, patents generally last 20 years from the filing date. Patents in the pharmaceutical sector may be extended via supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) up to five years, compensating for regulatory approval delays to prolong exclusivity.

Q2: How can competitors work around DK2648702?
A2: Competitors may design new compounds outside the patent’s claim scope, modify the chemical structure to avoid infringement, or develop alternative methods of use not covered explicitly by the claims.

Q3: Why is claim drafting crucial in pharmaceutical patents?
A3: Precise claims determine the scope of patent protection, influencing enforceability and vulnerability to invalidation. Overly broad claims risk invalidation; overly narrow claims may limit market protection.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
A4: A dense patent landscape can deter innovation or lead to the pursuit of novel chemical classes. Companies analyze existing patents to identify unmet needs and avoid infringement while designing around existing IP.

Q5: What are the benefits of securing patents like DK2648702 in Denmark?
A5: Patents provide exclusive rights in Denmark, facilitating market positioning, licensing opportunities, and negotiating leverage, especially within the European Union.


Sources:

  1. Danish Patent Office. Patent DK2648702 Documentation.
  2. European Patent Office. EPO Patent Search Database.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. PATENTSCOPE Database.
  4. Recent scientific literature on heterocyclic compounds in pharmaceuticals.
  5. Industry reports on global patent trends in medicinal chemistry.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.