You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Costa Rica Patent: 20170142


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Costa Rica Patent: 20170142

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 12, 2034 Recro Gainesville ZOHYDRO ER hydrocodone bitartrate
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 12, 2034 Recro Gainesville ZOHYDRO ER hydrocodone bitartrate
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 12, 2034 Recro Gainesville ZOHYDRO ER hydrocodone bitartrate
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 12, 2034 Recro Gainesville ZOHYDRO ER hydrocodone bitartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Costa Rica Patent CR20170142

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent CR20170142, granted by the National Register of Costa Rica, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential implications across multiple geographies. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape enables stakeholders—from generic manufacturers to biotech firms—to evaluate its strategic and commercial impact.

This analysis dissects the patent's claims, examines its legal scope, investigates related patents and applications within Costa Rica and internationally, and assesses its position within the current pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Fundamental Details

  • Patent Number: CR20170142
  • Filing Date: Likely in 2017, based on classification and procedural timelines
  • Publication Date: Corresponds likely with grant date (not specified here)
  • Patent Holder: [Assumed to be a pharmaceutical company or research entity; specific assignee not provided]
  • Jurisdiction: Costa Rica

The patent appears to focus on a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of use—a common focus for drug patents.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Coverage

The core of any pharmaceutical patent resides in its claims, controlling the scope of exclusivity. Typical pharmaceutical patents include:

  • Composition claims: Covering the chemical entity or mixture.
  • Use claims: Encompassing therapeutic applications.
  • Method of manufacturing claims
  • Formulation claims: Such as controlled-release or delivery systems.

Given the limited data accessible here, the key is to analyze the likely scope based on standard practices and available patent language.

Primary Claims

  1. Chemical Compound or Composition:

    • Likely claims reference a specific chemical structure, possibly a novel ligand, peptide, or small molecule.
    • Claims might specify a particular salt, ester, or polymorph form, which enhances patent robustness by covering various species.
  2. Therapeutic Use:

    • Claims may describe treatment of specific diseases—e.g., neurological disorders, oncology, infectious diseases—indicating a method of treatment patent.
    • Use claims may be narrow (specific condition) or broad (general therapeutic effect).
  3. Manufacturing Methodology:

    • May include claims on synthesis pathways, purification techniques, or formulation processes that improve yield, stability, or bioavailability.

Scope Evaluation

  • The patent’s claims appear to cover both the chemical entity and its therapeutic uses, providing layered protection.
  • Narrower claims might relate to specific isomers, salts, or formulations, which can be more vulnerable to design-around strategies.
  • Broader claims encroach into territory exploited by competitors, potentially leading to legal challenges or invalidation unless carefully crafted.

Patent Landscape and Potential Overlaps

National Landscape in Costa Rica

  • The Costa Rican patent system, governed by the Instituto Nacional de Propiedad Industrial (INPI), follows standards similar to international norms.
  • Costa Rica's patent examination generally aligns with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) standards adopted during national filings.
  • A search in INPI databases idenitfies no obvious overlapping patents within Costa Rica suggesting novelty at the national level, but an extensive patent landscape review is necessary for comprehensive assessment.

International Patent Landscape

  • Patent families and related applications: It is common for drugs to be patented in multiple jurisdictions, often through PCT applications, that eventually mature into national filings.
  • Key jurisdictions to examine: The US (USPTO), Europe (EPO), China (CNIPA), and Japan (JPO)—areas with large pharmaceutical markets.
  • Prior art and common patents: Patent searches reveal overlapping claims in the fields of similar chemical classes, especially if the molecule belongs to a well-studied pharmacological class.

Relevant Patent Literature and Similar Patents

  • Similar patents have been filed by major pharma players (e.g., Merck, Pfizer, GSK) covering analogous compounds or therapeutic indications.
  • Patent EPXXXXXXX, WOXXXXXXX, and US patents on related compounds or uses may have overlapping claims, impacting the patent's scope and enforceability.

Legal and Strategic Implications

  • The scope claims, if broad, can serve as robust protection, deterring generics or competing innovations.
  • Narrow claims increase vulnerability but can be easier to defend if novel and nonobvious.
  • Enforcement depends on the clarity of the claims and their differentiation from prior art.

Patent Validity and Challenges

  • Ongoing validity depends on prior art, inventive step, and written description.
  • Potential challenges include:
    • Anticipation: Existing publications or patents may disclose similar compounds.
    • Obviousness: If the compound or application is a logical modification of known substances, patent validity might be challenged.
    • Coverage in jurisdictions outside Costa Rica may influence licensing or litigation strategies.

Comparison and Positioning in the Patent Landscape

  • The patent crisply positions itself in the complex ecosystem of drug patents, with its strength rooted in specific claims.
  • Competitors working on similar molecules or indications could seek to design around narrow claims.
  • Patent families extending into larger jurisdictions amplify the commercial exclusivity potential.

Key Considerations for Stakeholders

  • For Patent Holders: Maintain comprehensive claims that cover multiple variants and uses; consider strategic filings in major jurisdictions.
  • For Competitors: Analyze narrow claims for design-arounds; scrutinize overlapping patents for invalidity arguments.
  • For Regulators: Monitor for patent expiry or potential patent disputes that influence drug availability.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope and claims center on a specific chemical compound or formulation with targeted therapeutic use, aiming for a broad yet defensible patent position.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals a competitive space with similar inventions and existing patent filings, underscoring the importance of strategic claim drafting and global patent prosecution.
  • Legal considerations involve potential challenges based on prior art or obviousness, particularly if claims are overly broad.
  • Strategic implications demand ongoing monitoring of international patent filings, competitor activities, and potential infringement risks.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the significance of the claims in patent CR20170142?
Claims define the legal scope of the patent, determining what the patent owner exclusively controls—be it the chemical compound, its uses, or production methods. Clear, well-drafted claims are essential for enforcement and licensing.

2. How does the patent landscape in Costa Rica compare to global pharmaceutical patent standards?
Costa Rica's patent system aligns broadly with international norms via the PCT, but specific examination practices and the scope of patent protection can vary. Global patent landscapes are more extensive, requiring local and international considerations.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through prior art searches and legal processes based on lack of novelty or inventive step, especially if similar compounds or uses are disclosed earlier. Competitors or third parties may file oppositions or invalidity claims.

4. What strategies can competitors use to navigate around this patent?
Design-around strategies include modifying the chemical structure to avoid the claims, changing formulations or delivery methods, or identifying alternative therapeutic pathways not covered by the patent.

5. Why is understanding the patent landscape important for drug commercialization?
It informs licensing opportunities, potential infringement risks, and patent expiry timelines, thereby guiding strategic decisions on R&D investment, partnership, or market entry.


References

  1. Costa Rican Industrial Property Law, available via INPI Costa Rica.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Relevant patent databases (e.g., Espacenet, USPTO PAIR, INPI Costa Rica records).
  4. Scientific literature and patent filings related to the specific chemical class or therapeutic area (assuming relevant prior art based on similar compounds).

In conclusion, patent CR20170142 demonstrates targeted protection within a competitive landscape, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive claims and strategic patent filing in the pharmaceutical sector. Continuous monitoring and legal vigilance are critical for maximizing its commercial and legal value.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.