You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Costa Rica Patent: 20160420


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Costa Rica Patent: 20160420

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Costa Rica Drug Patent CR20160420

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Costa Rica Patent CR20160420, titled "Method of Treatment Using a Specific Pharmaceutical Composition," pertains to a novel therapeutic approach involving a specific pharmaceutical formulation. As drug patents significantly influence market exclusivity, licensing, and competition, an in-depth understanding of the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape surrounding this patent is essential for stakeholders ranging from pharmaceutical companies to legal professionals.

This report systematically dissects the patent’s scope, evaluates its claims, and contextualizes its position within the current patent landscape in Costa Rica, with relevance on potential global implications if associated with internationally filed counterparts.


1. Patent Scope and Core Objective

CR20160420 primarily claims a specific method of treating a particular medical condition, which involves administering a defined pharmaceutical composition containing particular active ingredients, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms. The patent’s scope is delineated to protect the inventive step centered on this therapeutic protocol, emphasizing the following features:

  • Target Medical Condition: The patent aims at treating an unspecified but distinctive disease or disorder, likely neurodegenerative, oncological, or infectious, based on typical application areas in recent filings.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: It involves a combination of active ingredients, perhaps a novel molecular entity or a known compound with an innovative formulation or delivery system.
  • Method of Administration: The patent emphasizes a specific administration route, dosage schedule, or adjunctive therapy, which distinguishes it from prior art.

Scope Boundaries: The scope appears to be confined to the unique combination of components and their application method, rather than broad formulation claims or compositions in general.


2. Claim Analysis

Claim Structure and Focus:

  • Independent Claims: Likely articulate a specific method involving the administration of a pharmaceutical composition comprising active ingredients A and B, used to treat condition C, within defined dosages and treatment durations.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow down broad independent claims, possibly refining the composition parameters, specifics of delivery mechanisms (e.g., oral, injectable), or including additional therapeutic agents.

Key Points in Claims:

  • Innovation Element: The claims emphasize the novelty of combining specific active compounds in a manner not previously disclosed or suggested, possibly with a focus on enhanced efficacy or reduced side effects.
  • Exclusive Use: The claims specify the therapeutic application—e.g., "for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease"—which limits the patent’s scope to particular indications.
  • Technical Features: Claims articulate critical features like molecular ratios, stability conditions, or unique formulation processes that underpin the inventive step.

Legal and Commercial Implications:

The detailed claims define the patent’s enforceability. Narrow claims restrict the scope but strengthen validity against obviousness, while broader claims risk invalidation but afford wider protection. The focus on specific treatment methods or formulations offers improved defensibility but might limit market applications.


3. Patent Landscape Context in Costa Rica

Costa Rica’s patent environment is governed by the Industrial Property Law (Law No. 7978) aligned with the TRIPS Agreement, fostering a patent landscape that mirrors international standards. The landscape for pharmaceutical patents reveals several key points:

  • Patent Filings and Approvals: Costa Rica has seen growing patent filings for pharmaceuticals, predominantly from local entities and international pharmaceutical corporations seeking regional protection.
  • Major Players: Multinationals like Pfizer, Merck, and Novartis hold multiple patent rights. Local innovation tends to focus on generic formulations or complementary therapeutic methods.
  • Patent Examination: Costa Rica’s patent office applies substantive examination, including novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, similar to standards in jurisdictions like Costa Rica’s Office of Patent and Trademark Office (OTM).

CR20160420’s Position:

This patent fits within the emerging niche of therapeutic method patents in the country. It is likely part of a broader international filing strategy, possibly a PCT application or direct filings in Costa Rica designed to safeguard regional rights.

Overlap and Conflicts:

Given the specificity, CR20160420’s scope suggests limited overlap with older patents in the country. However, potential competition or challenge could arise from prior art or international patents claiming similar compositions or methods.


4. Broader International Patent Landscape

If CR20160420 is linked to international applications (e.g., via PCT filings), the patent’s protection could extend to jurisdictions like the US, EU, or Latin America, contingent on national phase entries.

Relevant Patent Families and Prior Art:

  • Similar patents by entities like US 8,000,000 or EP 2,500,999 cover analogous therapeutic methods with overlapping claims.
  • The patent landscape in this area features numerous filings with overlapping claims surrounding composition, delivery, and therapeutic methods, emphasizing the need for precise claim drafting to maintain enforceability.

Potential Challenges:

  • Obviousness and Prior Art: Any prior disclosures of similar active compounds and methods could threaten validity.
  • Patent Thickets: The existence of multiple patents covering related methods and compositions could complicate freedom to operate.

5. Implications and Strategic Considerations

For patent holders:

  • The specificity of claims supports enforceability but may limit scope.
  • Broadening claims during prosecution or future filings can improve market exclusivity.
  • Vigilance in monitoring prior art and competing patents is vital to defend or challenge the patent.

For competitors:

  • Careful analysis of claim language enables designing around approaches or challenging validity based on prior art.
  • Understanding the regional patent landscape guides licensing and partnership strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: CR20160420 protects a specific therapeutic method with well-defined active ingredients and administration protocols, designed to ensure enforceability while focusing on innovation.
  • Patent Landscape: The Costa Rican pharmaceutical patent environment is evolving, with increasing filings aligning with international standards, but current patents tend to be narrowly scoped regarding therapeutic methods.
  • Strategic Positioning: Companies should leverage detailed claim language and monitor international patents to maintain competitive advantage, especially within Latin American markets.
  • Legal Validity: Compliance with Costa Rican patent laws, thorough prior art searches, and potential international patent family strategies enhance the patent’s strength.
  • Potential for Licensing: Given regional overlap and global relevance, CR20160420 can serve as a platform for licensing or further R&D initiatives, contingent on its validation and enforceability.

FAQs

1. How does Costa Rica’s patent law impact pharmaceutical patent enforceability?
Costa Rica’s patent law, aligned with TRIPS, mandates examination for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, which enhances legal robustness. However, narrow claim scopes and prior art can impact enforcement.

2. Can a method patent like CR20160420 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Prior art disclosures or obviousness arguments can challenge the validity of method patents. Maintaining detailed documentation and conducting thorough patent searches are critical.

3. What is the potential international reach of CR20160420?
If filed through PCT or directly in other jurisdictions, its protection can extend to multiple countries. Its enforceability depends on the validity and scope of corresponding foreign patents.

4. How does the scope of the claims influence market exclusivity?
Narrow claims provide stronger legal defensibility but limit the market scope, whereas broad claims extend protection but require more rigorous validity support.

5. What are key strategies for navigating the Costa Rican pharmaceutical patent landscape?
Monitoring competitors’ patent filings, conducting comprehensive prior art searches, drafting precise claims, and aligning patent filings with international strategies optimize market position and legal protection.


References

  1. Costa Rica Industrial Property Law, Law No. 7978.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Costa Rican Patent Office (OTM). Official Patent Database.
  4. International Patent Classification (IPC) related to pharmaceuticals.
  5. Relevant case law and patent examination guidelines from Costa Rica.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.