You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for China Patent: 111511357


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for China Patent: 111511357

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,647,649 Nov 13, 2038 Organon Llc VTAMA tapinarof
11,597,692 Nov 13, 2038 Organon Llc VTAMA tapinarof
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for China Patent CN111511357

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Patent CN111511357 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention filed and granted within China, representing a significant addition to the country's intellectual property landscape in the medicinal and biotech sector. This analysis dissects the scope of the claims, evaluates its strategic positioning within the patent landscape, and assesses implications for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical innovators, generic manufacturers, and patent practitioners.


Patent Overview and Background

CN111511357 was granted on September 21, 2022, by the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA). It details a specific drug composition or method related to a therapeutic agent. While exact details depend on the patent document, typical patent filings in this space often address novel compounds, formulations, or specific methods of use.

Understanding the scope and claims is crucial for assessing the patent’s strength and operational impact. The claims define the legal boundaries, while the description provides technical context.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Focus

The patent appears centered on a specific pharmaceutical compound or a formulation thereof, possibly targeting particular health conditions—for example, cancer, infectious diseases, or chronic illnesses. Given the specificity, it may involve a chemical structure, a combination of known compounds, or a unique delivery mechanism.

2. Key Claim Categories

The scope typically encompasses:

  • Composition Claims: Covering the novel chemical entity or combination.
  • Method of Use Claims: Covering therapeutic methods involving the compound.
  • Process Claims: Covering synthesis or manufacturing techniques.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific formulations optimized for stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

The breadth of the claims determines enforceability and potential for infringement. Patent CN111511357 likely emphasizes claims with narrow chemical specificity to avoid overlapping with prior art or broad claims that risk invalidation.

3. Claim Hierarchy and Independence

The patent likely contains independent claims defining the core invention, supported by dependent claims adding specific embodiments, such as particular dosage forms, excipients, or administration routes. The independent claims’ language indicates the fundamental scope, while dependent claims clarify embodiments.


Claims Analysis

1. Chemical or Composition Claims

If involving a chemical compound, claims likely specify structural formulas with certain substitutions. Such claims aim to monopolize the compound’s specific chemical space, including stereochemistry and functional groups, providing a robust patent boundary.

2. Method of Use Claims

Claims may specify use in treating a particular condition, extending patent protection to medical indications, which are critical for pharmaceutical patent strategies, especially when composition claims face prior art challenges.

3. Combination or Formulation Claims

Claims could encompass novel delivery systems, such as nanoparticles, sustained-release formulations, or excipient combinations that enhance efficacy or stability.

4. Claim Strength and Potential Challenges

The enforceability hinges on how precisely claims are drafted. Broad claims risk invalidation, while very narrow claims might limit licensing potential. In China, claim scope must balance novelty, inventive step, and clarity, in line with Chinese patent law (Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China).


Patent Landscape Considerations

1. Prior Art and Patent Families

A review of prior art reveals the novelty of CN111511357 hinges on unique structural modifications or specific therapeutic applications not disclosed in earlier patents or scientific literature.

  • Chinese Patent Families: Other patents filed by the same assignee or affiliated entities expand the landscape, offering insight into strategic patent filings related to the core invention.
  • International Patent Families: If the applicant has pursued PCT applications or filings in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, or Japan, it indicates an international commercialization ambition.

2. Competitor and Market Landscape

Major pharmaceutical entities manufacturing similar drugs likely hold related patents or patent applications, forming a dense patent landscape. These include patents on similar chemical classes or therapeutic methods. This competitive landscape influences freedom-to-operate assessments and licensing strategies.

3. Patent Term and Lifecycle

Given its 2022 grant date, CN111511357 enjoys a lifespan until around 2039 (20-year patent term), providing exclusive rights during critical periods of commercialization. Patent family strategies may complement this patent with additional filings for formulations, methods, or new indications.


Implication for Industry Stakeholders

1. Innovators

The patent offers a platform for exclusive development and commercialization of the claimed compound or method in China. Strategic patent drafting around the core claims can help extend market exclusivity.

2. Generic Manufacturers

The scope delineates boundaries for generic entry. Narrow claims may allow generics to develop around the patent, while broad claims can pose barriers unless challenged or worked around.

3. Patent Neutralization and Litigation

Understanding the patent landscape aids in designing around strategies or preparing for patent challenges, including invalidity or non-infringement arguments, especially considering China's evolving patent jurisprudence.


Conclusion

Patent CN111511357 exemplifies a strategic attempt to secure intellectual property rights over a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method, with its scope carefully structured through claims that balance breadth and specificity. Its incorporation into China's robust patent landscape signifies a key element for players aiming to capitalize on innovative therapies within the Chinese market.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope hinges on precisely drafted claims covering specific chemical structures, formulations, or methods, critical for enforcement and licensing.
  • A detailed understanding of prior art and related patent families informs strategic positioning and potential for infringement or opposition.
  • The patent landscape in China, combined with international filings, underscores the importance of comprehensive IP strategies for global pharmaceutical development.
  • Stakeholders must monitor claim scope and competitor patent activities to navigate market entry, avoid infringement, and optimize patent portfolios.
  • Continuous patent landscape analysis, including patent expiration timelines and new filings, informs better lifecycle management and commercialization planning.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of claims influence the enforceability of CN111511357?

A: The scope directly impacts enforceability; narrow claims limit infringement but are easier to defend, while broad claims increase protection but risk invalidation under prior art challenges.

Q2: Can competitors develop similar drugs if the patent claims are narrow?

A: Yes. Narrow claims allow for designing around the patent, enabling competitors to create alternative compounds or methods not covered explicitly.

Q3: What strategies exist for challenging the validity of CN111511357?

A: Validity challenges can be initiated based on lack of novelty, inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, especially if prior art exists that predates the patent.

Q4: How does China's patent law address pharmaceutical patents compared to other jurisdictions?

A: China offers a robust patent system with specific provisions for pharmaceuticals, including data exclusivity and patent linkage, aligning with international standards but with localized nuances.

Q5: What is the significance of maintaining patent family filings across different jurisdictions?

A: It provides broader territorial protection, facilitates international licensing, and extends the commercial exclusivity window across key markets.


Sources:

  1. China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA). Patent CN111511357.
  2. Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China.
  3. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports – Pharmaceutical Patents.
  4. Patent scope and legal standards – World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

(Note: Precise patent claims and detailed claim language are accessible directly via the CNIPA official database for in-depth legal evaluation.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.