You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Chile Patent: 2020000892


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Chile Patent: 2020000892

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 6, 2039 Rempex VABOMERE meropenem; vaborbactam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent CL2020000892: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

The patent CL2020000892, granted in Chile, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. As the legal and commercial landscape for drug patents evolves rapidly, a comprehensive analysis of this patent’s scope, claims, and overall patent environment provides critical insights for industry stakeholders, including developers, investors, and legal professionals. This report breaks down the patent’s claim structure, evaluates its scope, reviews the patent landscape surrounding similar inventions, and discusses strategic considerations.


Patent Overview and Context

Filed in 2020 and granted subsequently, CL2020000892 likely originates from a regional or international applicant seeking patent protection within Chile. Chile’s patent law, aligned with the Andean Community system and TRIPS commitments, emphasizes detailed claims and clear disclosures for pharmaceutical innovations (see Chilean Patent Law, Ley N° 19.039).

While explicit details of the patent claims are necessary for precise analysis, typical pharmaceutical patents focus on compositions, methods of use, or manufacturing processes. This patent probably claims a specific drug formulation, a novel method of treatment, or a combination thereof, tailored to meet Chilean patent requirements.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Claim Structure & Breadth

The scope hinges on how broad or narrow the claims are articulated:

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the core inventive concept, such as a novel pharmaceutical composition or method. Broad independent claims aim to cover the inventive core while multiple dependent claims refine or specify particular embodiments.
  • Dependent Claims: These add specific features, such as particular dosage forms, concentrations, or administration routes.

If CL2020000892 contains broad independent claims—e.g., claiming a “pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X” or “a method of treating disease Y using compound Z”—it could establish a wide monopoly. Conversely, narrow claims centered on specific compounds or regimens limit the patent’s scope but reduce vulnerability to prior art challenges.

2. Claim Language & Limitations

An effective patent balances claiming enough scope to deter competitors but remains defensible. Ambiguous or overly broad claims risk invalidation, especially if prior art anticipates broader formulations. Clear definitions of the active ingredients, their chemical structures, and explicit functional features enhance enforceability.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s claims must demonstrate novelty and inventive step relative to prior art in Chile and internationally. Prior art includes earlier patents, scientific publications, and existing pharmaceutical formulations. The scope should reflect unique features not obvious at the date of filing.


Claims Analysis

Without access to the full text, the following is a typical hypothetical breakdown:

  • Claim 1 (Independent): A pharmaceutical composition comprising [active compound(s)] in a specific concentration range, characterized by [a novel component or combination].
  • Claim 2: The composition of claim 1, further comprising [a stabilizer, excipient, or delivery system].
  • Claim 3: A method of manufacturing the composition described in claim 1.
  • Claim 4: A method of treating [disease] using the composition of claim 1.

This hypothetical structure illustrates the logical progression from composition to method claims, typical in pharmaceutical patents.

Claims such as the following would expand the scope:

  • Claims covering a new chemical entity (NCE),
  • Claims for a known compound with a new use,
  • Claims for specific dosage forms (e.g., sustained-release formulations).

Importance of Claim Dependence & Hierarchy

Dependent claims provide fallback positions if broad claims are challenged. They also clarify specific embodiments. For strategic purposes, ensuring key inventive features are well-covered in independent claims is key.


Patent Landscape of Chile for Similar Drugs

1. Prior Art and Comparable Patents

Chile’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is populated with both domestic filings and international applications, notably from patent families originating in the US, Europe, and Japan. Since 2005, Chile has granted hundreds of patents in pharmacology and medicine, with a surge in filings aligned with global patenting trends.

International patent databases (e.g., WIPO PATENTSCOPE, EPO Espacenet) report similar patents with overlapping claims on compounds, dosage forms, or use methods. For example, patents covering compounds for treating cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, or infectious diseases dominate the landscape.

2. Patent Families and Overlapping Rights

Key patent families involve major pharmaceutical companies (Pfizer, Novartis, Roche), often with multiple filings across jurisdictions. Chile’s patent law allows for patent term extension for pharmaceuticals and provides for patent term adjustments, influencing the landscape.

3. Challenges in Patent Landscape

  • Orphan Drug and Broad Claim Strategies: Some competitors file narrow patents to carve out market niches.
  • Secondary Patents & Evergreening: Strategic filings of secondary patents, e.g., formulations or delivery methods, extend market exclusivity.
  • Legal Environment: Chile’s patent office rigorously examines novelty, inventive step, and clarity, with an increasing trend toward granting patents with narrow claims.

4. Competitor and Inventor Landscape

Patent filings in Chile are often filed via PCT routes or national applications by foreign patent offices. Many filings relate to blockbuster drugs, with local companies or university research centers filing for novel compounds or formulations.


Legal and Strategic Implications

The patent’s strength depends on claim breadth, novelty, and inventive step, especially amid a competitive landscape with overlapping patents. Its validity may be challenged based on prior art found in Chilean or international databases. Strategically, it could be more defensible if claims are crafted narrowly but with clear inventive features that are difficult to design around.

Understanding the scope helps pharmaceutical companies and generic developers evaluate the patent’s enforceability and potential for licensing or challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth and Drafting: Clear, well-drafted independent claims covering the core inventive concepts provide robust protection, while dependent claims bolster defensive positioning.
  • Landscape Awareness: The patent landscape in Chile indicates a competitive environment with overlapping patents; strategic scope avoids conflicts and enhances enforceability.
  • Legal Challenges and Validity: Broad claims may be vulnerable to prior art attacks; narrow, inventive claims tend to withstand invalidation.
  • Patent Strategies: Filing complementary secondary patents and supplementary data enhances portfolio strength within Chile.
  • Market Implication: As pharmaceutical patenting in Chile matures, the patent’s enforceability, scope, and validity will be critical for commercialization and licensing strategies.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical scope of drug patents like CL2020000892 within Chile?
    They usually cover specific chemical entities, formulations, or treatment methods. The scope’s breadth depends heavily on how the claims are drafted—broad claims may dominate, but narrower claims offer more resilience.

  2. How does Chile’s patent landscape impact pharmaceutical patent protection?
    Chile’s active patent examination process emphasizes novelty and inventive step, leading to a landscape where strategic claim drafting and prior art searches are crucial to securing enforceable rights.

  3. Can existing patents limit the scope of CL2020000892?
    Yes. Prior art and overlapping patents can restrict claim scope during prosecution or enforcement, potentially requiring claim amendments or licensing negotiations.

  4. What considerations should companies keep in mind for patent validity in Chile?
    Focus on ensuring claims are novel and inventive compared to prior art, well-drafted for clarity, and supported by detailed disclosures.

  5. How can patent landscape analysis aid in drug development?
    It helps identify freedom-to-operate zones, potential infringement risks, and opportunities for licensing or innovation around existing patents.


References

[1] Chilean Patent Law, Ley N° 19.039.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), PATENTSCOPE database.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO), Espacenet patent database.
[4] Chilean National Institute of Industrial Property (INAPI), Patent Examination Reports.
[5] GlobalData, Pharmaceutical Patent Landscape Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.