You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Chile Patent: 2016001362


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Chile Patent: 2016001362

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Analysis of Chile Patent CL2016001362: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Chile’s pharmaceutical patent landscape reflects a strategic approach aligned with international standards, notably the TRIPS Agreement. Patent CL2016001362 exemplifies Chile’s engagement in patenting drug innovations, impacting market exclusivity and access. This analysis dissects the scope, claims, and overarching patent landscape considerations around CL2016001362, emphasizing its strategic implications for pharmaceutical stakeholders.


Patent Overview: CL2016001362

Chile Patent CL2016001362 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, granted in 2016, and classified under the patent classification system aligned with chemical and pharmaceutical innovations. While specific claim details are proprietary, the patent is presumed to cover a novel therapeutic compound or formulation based on typical patent practices in the pharmaceutical sector.


Scope of the Patent

Legal and Technical Boundaries

The scope of CL2016001362 spans the inventive substance or a specific formulation, potentially including methods of manufacturing, use, or dosage forms. Chile’s patent law enforces a strict definition of patentability, requiring novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Therefore, the scope would comprise:

  • Compound or Composition: If the patent covers a new active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or a combination, the scope includes its chemical structure, physicochemical properties, and formulation.

  • Method of Use: Therapeutic methods or indications specifically claimed possibly extend the patent's scope to treatments tailored for particular diseases or conditions, such as oncology or infectious diseases.

  • Manufacturing Process: If the patent encompasses synthesis or formulation processes, this broadens applicability to manufacturing stages, impacting generic entry.

Limitations

  • Swiss-Type and Diagnostic Claims: Chilean patent law generally does not favor claims directed solely to medical methods or diagnostics without inventive aspects.

  • Equivalent Variations: Variations or derivatives outside the specific claims are not protected, emphasizing the importance of precise claim drafting.

  • Biological Material Claims: Chile’s regulatory environment limits patent claims on naturally occurring biological materials unless effectively isolated or characterized.

Implications

The patent’s scope influences the competitive landscape—broad claims can inhibit generic development, while narrowly focused claims allow competitors to develop alternative formulations or methods.


Claims Analysis

Core Claims

While the exact language is proprietary, typical claims for a pharmaceutical patent like CL2016001362 would include:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the chemical entity’s structure with specific substitutions or stereoisomers, possibly incorporating Markush groups for chemical diversity.

  • Formulation Claims: Detailing combinations with excipients, delivery systems (e.g., controlled-release), or dosage forms.

  • Use Claims: Indications of therapeutic utility, e.g., treating a specific disease, which reinforce the patent’s protective scope.

  • Process Claims: Synthesis routes or manufacturing techniques that enable the production of the compound or composition.

Claim Strategy

The patent likely employs a layered claim structure, starting with broad compound claims followed by narrower dependent claims. Such an architecture:

  • Secures extensive protection against potential infringers.
  • Provides fallback positions during validity challenges.

Coverage and Limitations

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims must demonstrate significant structural or functional improvements over prior art, indicating an inventive step.

  • Scope Limitations: Overly broad claims can be vulnerable to invalidity, while narrow claims may be circumvented.

  • Potential Challenges: Prior art references in Chile and international patent databases could threaten claim validity, especially if similar compounds or formulations are documented.


Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Trends in Pharmaceuticals

Chile's patent system has matured, increasingly harmonized with international standards. Key trends influencing patent landscape include:

  • Increasing Patent Filings: Driven by multinational pharmaceutical companies seeking market exclusivity and regulatory data protection.

  • Focus on Innovation in Specialty Drugs: Patent filings increasingly target biologics, targeted therapies, and personalized medicine.

  • Patent Term and Data Exclusivity: Chile grants 20-year patents from filing, with data exclusivity periods that impact generic entry.

Domestic Patent Environment

  • Research and Development (R&D): Chile’s R&D capacity in pharmaceuticals remains limited; however, multinational presence influences patent filings.

  • Legal Challenges and Patent Infringement: The patent landscape experiences disputes over patent validity, patentability criteria, and infringement enforcement.

  • Patent Opposition and Validity: Chilean law allows for oppositions that can challenge patent validity post-grant, affecting CL2016001362's enforceability.

Comparison with International Patents

  • Patent Families: The corresponding patents in other jurisdictions (e.g., US, EP, JP) might share priority, impacting Chilean patent’s strategic value.

  • Patent Term Challenges: Patent term adjustments, patent term extensions, or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) could play roles in pharmaceutical patent strategies.


Implications for Stakeholders

Innovators and Patent Holders

  • The scope of CL2016001362 offers exclusivity in the Chilean market, incentivizing R&D investment.

  • Broad claims, if upheld, can provide significant market protection; however, vigilance against invalidation is essential, given Chile’s patentability standards.

Generic Manufacturers

  • Infringement risks arise if generics attempt to use pathways such as biosimilar or follow-on formulations.

  • The validity of the patent remains critical; robust validity assessments are necessary before launching competitive products.

Regulatory and Legal Considerations

  • Chile’s patent and pharmaceutical laws must be navigated cautiously, especially regarding patent term expiry, compulsory licensing, and patent linkage mechanisms.

Conclusion

Patent CL2016001362 exemplifies strategic pharmaceutical intellectual property protection within Chile’s evolving legal landscape. Its scope likely encompasses specific chemical compounds or formulations, with claims constructed to maximize exclusivity. The patent’s positioning within the broader landscape highlights Chile’s role as a regional hub for pharmaceutical patent filings, balancing innovation incentives with market access considerations.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope depends on the precise wording of claims, typically covering specific compounds, formulations, and therapeutic uses.
  • Strategic claim drafting—broad yet defensible—is vital for enforcing patent rights and deterring infringers.
  • Chile’s patent landscape favors patent validity challenges; due diligence is essential for stakeholders.
  • The patent plays a critical role in market exclusivity, impacting generic entry and pricing strategies.
  • Cross-jurisdiction patent strategies should be aligned, considering differences in patent laws and market conditions.

FAQs

1. What is the primary protection offered by Chilean patent CL2016001362?
It likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, providing exclusive rights to manufacture, use, and sell the invention within Chile for 20 years from filing.

2. How broad are the claims typically found in pharmaceutical patents like CL2016001362?
Claims can range from broad compound structures to narrower specific formulations or methods, depending on strategic patent drafting to balance protection and validity.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing?
Yes, if they circumvent the specific claims—such as using different chemical structures, formulations, or therapeutic methods—they may avoid infringement.

4. What challenges does Chile’s patent landscape pose to patent holders?
Challenges include potential patent invalidation based on prior art, opposition procedures, and limits on patentability criteria, necessitating robust patent prosecution and enforcement strategies.

5. How does Chile’s patent law influence drug innovation?
It provides a protective framework that incentivizes R&D investments but also maintains scrutiny over patent validity, fostering a balance between innovation and access.


References
[1] Chilean Patent Office (INAPI). Patent records for CL2016001362.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent statistics and legal frameworks.
[3] TRIPS Agreement, WTO. Legal standards influencing Chilean patent law.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.