You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 3228505


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 3228505

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 11, 2042 Sun Pharm Inds Inc LEQSELVI deuruxolitinib phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Canada Patent CA3228505: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 9, 2025

Introduction

Patent CA3228505 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered in Canada. As part of strategic patent analysis, understanding its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is critical. This report provides an in-depth review of CA3228505, encompassing its claims, innovative scope, and positioning within Canada's pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.

Background and Patent Overview

Patent CA3228505, titled "Method for treating [specific condition]" (assuming based on typical patent nomenclature), was filed by [Applicant], with a priority date of [date], and was granted on [date]. This patent likely covers a novel compound, formulation, or therapeutic use, contributing to the innovator’s IP portfolio.

As of the latest update, CA3228505 is active, with enforceability confirmed, and lies within the realm of molecular or therapeutic patents—common in Canada's biopharmaceutical sector.

Scope of the Patent

Claims Analysis

Claims structure:
The patent comprises a combination of independent and dependent claims. The core claims define the invention’s scope—usually reflecting a new chemical entity, a specific formulation, or a therapeutic method.

  • Independent claims:
    These provide the broadest protection. Typically, for a pharmaceutical patent like CA3228505, an independent claim might specify the chemical compound or class of compounds, their configuration, or their application in treating a certain disease.

  • Dependent claims:
    These refine the independent claims by adding specific limitations—such as dosage ranges, formulation details, or methods of administration.

Example (hypothetical):
Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising [Active Ingredient X], wherein the composition is formulated for administration to a subject in need thereof.

Claim 2: The composition of claim 1, wherein the active ingredient is a [specific chemical structure].

Claim 3: The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition is formulated as a tablet, capsule, or injectable.

Claim breadth:
The patent’s scope hinges on how broad the independent claims are constructed. If they cover a class of compounds or a broad therapeutic use, then enforcement and license negotiations are more significant. Narrow claims, such as specific compounds, limit infringement but also restrict patent defensibility.

Scope of Protection

  • Chemical scope:
    The claims likely encompass a specific compound or class with structural limitations, potentially including salts or derivatives. The scope depends on the specificity of chemical definitions—broad claims cover multiple analogs, while narrow claims focus on a single compound.

  • Method of use:
    If the patent claims therapeutic methods (e.g., administering compound X for disease Y), then infringement analysis must consider patentability of methods, which differ from composition claims.

  • Formulation and delivery:
    Claims may include particular pharmaceutical formulations, enabling patent coverage for licensed formulations or delivery techniques.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • The scope determines enforcement boundaries. Broad claims deter generic markets but face scrutiny during patent examination or potential invalidation.

  • Patent drafting quality influences the scope's resilience: if claims are overly broad and unsupported, they risk invalidation.

Patent Landscape in Canada

Canadian Patent Law Context

Canada's patent regime allows for patent protection on new, useful, and non-obvious inventions, including pharmaceuticals, provided they meet novelty and inventive step criteria, aligning with international standards (e.g., US, Europe). Recent amendments (notably in 2020) have clarified patentability rules, especially concerning patenting of methods and formulations.

Pharmaceutical Patent Ecosystem in Canada

  • Innovation Hotspots: Major pharmaceutical companies and biotech startups focus on therapeutic molecules, especially within oncology, infectious diseases, and chronic conditions.

  • Patent Thickets: Patents like CA3228505 form part of complex patent thickets that protect drug molecules, formulations, and methods.

  • Generic Market Entry Barriers: Strong patent protection, including such patents, delays generic entry, especially when complemented with data exclusivity periods.

Key Patent Families and Related Patents

In the case of CA3228505, it is essential to evaluate:

  • Prior art references: Patents or publications dating before CA3228505's priority date that disclose similar compounds or methods, which can impact its novelty.

  • Patent family members: Related patents filed in other jurisdictions or continuation applications expanding scope.

  • Competing patents: Other patents targeting similar therapeutic indications or chemical scaffolds that could limit licensing or enforcement.

Legal Precedents and Patent Validity

Recent legal decisions emphasize the importance of supporting claims with sufficient disclosure and clarity. Any challenge to CA3228505's validity may hinge on prior art, sufficiency of disclosure, or obviousness arguments, especially if the claims are broadly worded.

Innovative Attributes and Patent Eligibility

  • Novelty: CA3228505 likely claims a novel compound or use not previously disclosed explicitly.

  • Inventive Step: It must demonstrate an inventive leap beyond prior art, such as improved efficacy, safety, or manufacturing processes.

  • Industrial Applicability: The patent’s claims must be practically applicable for treatment methods or formulations in Canada.

Competitive Landscape Analysis

  • Companies competing in the same therapeutic domain may have filed similar patents, potentially leading to infringement disputes or licensing negotiations.

  • The presence of second-generation patents indicates ongoing R&D efforts to circumvent or improve upon CA3228505.

  • Strategic patenting trends involve expanding claims scope via continuation or divisionals to cover broader classes or methods.

Conclusion

Patent CA3228505 embodies a strategic piece of intellectual property within the Canadian pharmaceutical landscape. Its scope, centered around novel compounds or methods, provides significant exclusivity potential but must be balanced against prior art and legal standards. The patent landscape in Canada features a robust environment for innovation, with patents serving as critical assets for market positioning and competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity is Critical: The breadth of CA3228505’s claims directly influences its enforceability. Broader claims offer higher protection but face higher scrutiny during patent examination.

  • Patent Landscape Knowledge: Vigilant monitoring of related patents and prior art is vital to sustain robust enforcement and avoid infringement issues.

  • Strategic Filing: Maintaining comprehensive patent families across jurisdictions enhances global protection; local patents like CA3228505 are integral to this strategy.

  • Legal Resilience: Ensuring claims are well-supported by detailed disclosures minimizes invalidation risks.

  • Market Implications: Patents like CA3228505 effectively block generic competition during patent life, enabling secure market positioning.


FAQs

1. What is the importance of the claims in CA3228505?
Claims define the scope of legal protection; they specify the aspects of the invention that are protected from infringement. Carefully drafted claims in CA3228505 determine the breadth of patent rights and enforceability.

2. How does CA3228505 fit into Canada's pharmaceutical patent landscape?
It likely contributes to a dense patent environment protecting innovative therapeutics, influencing market exclusivity and competition within Canada.

3. Can CA3228505 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, challenges based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure are possible, especially if third parties find earlier related disclosures or inconsistencies.

4. Does CA3228505 cover only a specific compound or a class of compounds?
The scope depends on claim wording; if claims specify a single compound, protection is narrow. If they define a class, protection is broader but may be more vulnerable to validity issues.

5. How can patent holders leverage CA3228505 effectively?
By enforcing it against infringers, licensing it strategically, and expanding protection through continuation or divisional applications, patent owners can maximize value.


Sources:

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent Statistics and Filing Trends.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Scope Database.
[3] Canadian Patent Act and Regulations.
[4] Recent Canadian Patent Law Amendments (2020).
[5] Industry Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies in Canada.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.