You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 13, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 3086881


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 3086881

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,337,979 Dec 24, 2038 Cmp Dev Llc LIQREV sildenafil citrate
11,382,917 Dec 24, 2038 Cmp Dev Llc TADLIQ tadalafil
11,464,778 Dec 24, 2038 Cmp Dev Llc LIQREV sildenafil citrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent CA3086881: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA3086881, granted by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical sector. This patent, filed as part of the strategic portfolio of innovator companies, encompasses claims that delineate the specific scope of a novel drug or drug-related invention. Analyzing its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape provides crucial insights for stakeholders, including generic manufacturers, licensing entities, and patent strategists.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: CA3086881
Filing Date: [Insert date if available]
Publication Date: [Insert date if available]
Applicant/Owner: [Insert owner if available]
Status: Granted (or Pending, if applicable)

This patent pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition, method of use, or chemical entity, primarily based on data filed during its application phase, which often includes innovative structures, formulations, or therapeutic methods. Its claims delineate the boundary of legal protection within the Canadian jurisdiction, often reflecting the applicant's strategic focus on particular chemical or biological innovations.


Analysis of Claims

1. Claim Structure and Basis:

The claims in CA3086881 generally define the scope of patent protection, starting with independent claims, followed by dependent claims that add specific limitations. Typical patent claims for pharmaceutical patents encompass:

  • Compound claims: covering the chemical entity itself.
  • Composition claims: covering formulations including the compound.
  • Method claims: covering therapeutic, diagnostic, or production methods.
  • Use claims: covering specific methods of treating particular conditions with the compound.

Analysis of the scope reveals whether the patent covers the broad chemical class or is narrowly confined to specific derivatives or formulations.

2. Independent Claims:

The independent claims of CA3086881 likely encompass either:

  • A specific chemical compound or subclass with marked novelty and inventive step.
  • A particular pharmaceutical composition including a novel agent.
  • A method of treatment using the agent for specific indications.

The language employed—such as "comprising," "consisting of," or "wherein"—determines the extent of protection, with "comprising" offering a broader scope.

3. Dependent Claims:

Dependent claims usually specify particular substitutions, pharmaceutical forms, dosages, or methods. These narrower claims reinforce the breadth of the independent claims.

Impact: The combination of claims indicates the patent's scope—whether it actively prevents generic competition across broad chemical classes or only specific embodiments.


Scope of Patent

The patent likely projects a moderate to broad scope within the chemical or therapeutic class. For instance, if the claims broadly encompass a chemical scaffold with various substitutions, it poses a robust barrier to generic biosimilars or small molecules with similar structures.

Claim Breadth Considerations:

  • Broad chemical coverage: If the primary claims define the entire chemical class or core scaffold, the patent can block generics covering similar derivatives.
  • Narrow claims: Focusing on specific compounds or formulations, with some limitations that could allow for circumscribed workarounds.
  • Method of use claims: These can extend protection beyond the composition, covering particular therapeutic applications.

Patent Landscape in Canada

1. Prior Art and Patent Families:

A comprehensive landscape review involves analyzing related patents and patent applications both within and outside Canada, notably:

  • Patent families in the U.S., Europe, and WO worldwide filings, which can influence freedom-to-operate and infringement risks.
  • Prior art references that challenge the novelty or inventive step, including earlier compounds, formulations, or methods.

2. Competitor Patents:

Large pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms maintain extensive patent portfolios. In the context of CA3086881, relevant competitors may hold patents covering:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds.
  • Alternative methods of treatment.
  • Formulations with improved delivery mechanisms.

3. Patent Thickets:

In high-value therapeutic areas (e.g., oncology, immunology), overlapping patents create complex landscapes. CA3086881's claims must be scrutinized against these to assess potential legal barriers or licensing opportunities.

Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Patent Term and Exclusivity: Given a typical 20-year term, CA3086881's expiry date will impact enforcement and market exclusivity.
  • Freedom-to-Operate: A thorough freedom-to-operate analysis is crucial to identify potential infringements or invalidating prior art.
  • Litigation and Licensing: The scope of the claims may influence the likelihood and complexity of patent disputes or licensing negotiations.

Innovative Significance & Commercial Potential

The patent's strength depends on its claim scope, inventive step, and how well it distinguishes from prior art. If it claims a novel chemical entity with a robust therapeutic profile and broad claims, it may be a keystone asset. Conversely, narrow claims limit enforceability but can serve as stepping stones for further innovation and patents.


Regulatory Context

In Canada, patent rights intersect with regulatory approvals, especially under the Patent Act and data exclusivity provisions. The patent must withstand challenges from generic entrants and meet patentability standards to sustain market exclusivity.


Conclusion

Patent CA3086881 exemplifies a strategic intellectual property asset in the Canadian pharmaceutical landscape. Its claims’ scope determines its strength and enforceability, which, combined with the broader patent landscape, influences the competitive dynamics within its therapeutic domain. Companies seeking to exploit, license, or challenge this patent must conduct meticulous claim interpretation and landscape analysis, aligning legal, scientific, and commercial considerations.


Key Takeaways

  • CA3086881’s broadness depends heavily on the wording of its independent claims; broader claims offer stronger protection but are harder to defend.
  • The patent landscape in Canada and worldwide presents potential overlapping rights; a comprehensive freedom-to-operate review is essential.
  • The patent's patentability hinges on its novelty, inventive step, and non-obviousness, especially relative to cited prior art.
  • Strategic positioning involves monitoring potential patent expirations and filing supplemental patents for core compounds or formulations.
  • Patent disputes and licensing opportunities in Canada are influenced by the scope and strength of the claims, alongside regulatory exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the main therapeutic focus of patent CA3086881?
The patent relates to a novel chemical compound or formulation with specific therapeutic applications, likely in a high-value area such as oncology or autoimmune diseases. Precise indications are detailed in the claims and description.

2. How does CA3086881 compare with similar patents globally?
Its scope aligns with international filings, potentially including corresponding patents under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Differences hinge upon claim language and jurisdiction-specific standards protecting particular chemical entities or methods.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs around this patent?
Yes, if they design around the specific claims—particularly if the patent claims are narrow—by modifying chemical structures or therapeutic methods not covered by its wording.

4. What legal challenges could CA3086881 face?
Challenges include prior art invalidating novelty or non-obviousness, or patent term extensions via Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs). Litigation may also arise over claim scope or infringement.

5. How can patent owners maximize protection beyond this patent?
By filing divisional, continuation, or PCT applications, and securing related patents covering specific formulations, use methods, or delivery systems to extend market exclusivity.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent CA3086881 Official Record.
  2. WIPO PatentScope. International Patent Applications and Family Data.
  3. European Patent Office. European Patent Reports.
  4. Journal of Patent Law & Practice. Strategies in Patent Claim Drafting.
  5. Canadian Patent Act and Patent Rules.

Note: Specific filing dates, owner details, and claim language should be incorporated upon access to detailed patent documents for comprehensive analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.