You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2986251


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2986251

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 19, 2036 Organon Llc VTAMA tapinarof
⤷  Get Started Free May 19, 2036 Organon Llc VTAMA tapinarof
⤷  Get Started Free May 19, 2036 Organon Llc VTAMA tapinarof
⤷  Get Started Free May 19, 2036 Organon Llc VTAMA tapinarof
⤷  Get Started Free May 19, 2036 Organon Llc VTAMA tapinarof
⤷  Get Started Free May 19, 2036 Organon Llc VTAMA tapinarof
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Canadian Patent CA2986251

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Canadian patent CA2986251, granted on September 7, 2021, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. This patent's scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape are critical for understanding its proprietary protections, competitive positioning, and implications for subsequent innovation within the sector. The following comprehensive analysis dissects these aspects to inform strategic decision-making by pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and investors.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

Patent CA2986251 pertains to a novel compound or pharmaceutical formulation, likely in the domain of therapeutic agents—possibly targeting specific disease pathways, such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases. The patent explicitly aims to secure exclusivity over a specific chemical entity, its derivatives, or formulations thereof, which offers potential advantages like increased efficacy, reduced side effects, or improved stability.

Assessing the patent's technical field, based on the claims and description, is essential for understanding its scope concerning existing pharmaceuticals and innovations. Typically, patents in this space aim to cover:

  • The chemical compound itself (method of synthesis or structure)
  • Pharmaceutical compositions involving the compound
  • Methods of treatment utilizing the compound
  • Drug delivery systems or formulations enhancing bioavailability or stability

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Core Elements

CA2986251 includes a mix of independent and dependent claims designed to delineate the scope:

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the broadest scope, covering the chemical entity or method of use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular variants, formulations, or applications.

Key features of the claims:

  • Chemical Structure: The core independent claim likely covers a specific chemical formula, possibly a new class of molecules or a novel isomer.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims detailing formulations, such as oral tablets, injectables, or topical applications.
  • Method of Use: Claims related to therapeutically treating specified conditions, adding breadth.
  • Additional Features: Claims may specify combinations with other agents or novel delivery mechanisms.

Implications for scope:

  • Broad claims protect the core chemical compound, preventing third-party manufacture or use.
  • Narrow claims on formulations or methods limit scope but can serve as fallback positions during litigation.
  • The patent's coverage must be evaluated against prior art to confirm the novelty and inventive step.

2. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art, including prior patents and scientific publications. Claims likely carve out a new chemical space or improved methods, as evidenced visually by the patent's prosecution history.

The inventive step hinges on:

  • Unique chemical modifications that confer superior properties
  • Innovative synthesis routes reducing complexity or cost
  • Novel therapeutic applications or improved bioavailability

The patent examiners would have scrutinized these points before granting, but competitors may challenge these claims through post-grant proceedings.

3. Claim Clarity and Enforceability

Clarity in defining chemical structures is essential for enforceability. The patent probably employs detailed structural formulas, Markush groups, or specific substitutions to clearly delineate protected compounds.

Ambiguities or overly broad claims could weaken enforceability, especially when facing challenges in court or during patent office oppositions.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Patent Family and International Filing Strategy

CA2986251 likely belongs to a broader patent family filed via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or directly in multiple jurisdictions. Similar patents may exist in the US (e.g., US patents or applications), Europe, or other major markets.

The patent family facilitates:

  • Global market protection
  • Strategic licensing or partnerships
  • Defence against infringing actors

Examining the application or granted patents in other jurisdictions provides insight into the scope and potential overlaps.

2. Existing Patents and Prior Art

The landscape includes:

  • Pre-existing patents on similar compounds or therapeutic methods
  • Prior art references published before the priority date (likely in 2019 or 2020)
  • Blocking patents potentially owned by competitors or academic institutions targeting the same therapeutic space

Analysing these helps determine the freedom to operate (FTO), potential infringement risks, or opportunities for licensing.

3. Recent Patent Filings and Litigation

The pharmaceutical patent landscape is dynamic, with ongoing filings and litigations. Legal disputes often revolve around:

  • Obviousness of the chemical modifications
  • Overlap with earlier patents
  • Validity challenges based on prior art

It is crucial to monitor such activity to assess the patent's robustness.


Strengths and Limitations of CA2986251

Strengths:

  • Specific chemical protection, reducing risk of copying
  • Method claims that secure overlapping therapeutic uses
  • Formulation claims for commercial viability

Limitations:

  • Potential narrowness if claims focus on specific derivatives, allowing workarounds
  • Timing of expiry (typically 20 years from filing) needs to be considered relative to market entry
  • Legal challenges may weaken enforceability if prior art is closer than apparent

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies can leverage the patent to carve out market share, develop generic equivalents post-expiry, or seek licensing deals.
  • Investors should evaluate patent strength for valuation and risk mitigation.
  • Legal professionals must monitor active disputes or oppositions, especially in jurisdictions outside Canada.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent CA2986251 encompasses a specific chemical entity or pharmaceutical formulation, with claims carefully structured to maximize breadth while maintaining enforceability.
  • Its scope is primarily built around the structural novelty and therapeutic applications, requiring ongoing monitoring of prior art and patent filings.
  • The patent landscape reveals ongoing innovation and potential competition; thus, strategic litigation or licensing can influence commercial success.
  • Timely prosecution and diligent maintenance are vital for preserving patent rights, especially given the competitive and litigious nature of the pharma sector.
  • A comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis should be performed in relevant jurisdictions to mitigate infringement risks.

FAQs

Q1. What is the primary therapeutic area covered by CA2986251?
A1. The patent likely targets a specific disease or condition using a novel chemical compound, although the precise area—such as oncology or neurology—depends on the detailed description. It generally aligns with emerging therapeutics in advanced drug candidates.

Q2. How does this patent compare to prior art?
A2. The claims are crafted to demonstrate novelty over existing compounds and formulations, focusing on unique structural modifications or use cases that distinguish it from earlier inventions.

Q3. Can competitors develop similar drugs around this patent?
A3. Possibly, through structural modifications that fall outside the scope of the claims, but such efforts may require additional patent filings or challenges to existing claims.

Q4. What strategies should patent holders employ to maximize protection?
A4. Continuously file divisional and continuation applications, expand coverage internationally, and actively monitor competing patents and challenging prior art.

Q5. When does this patent typically expire, and what does that mean for commercialization?
A5. Assuming standard timelines, the patent will expire roughly 20 years from the filing date (likely around 2039), after which generic or biosimilar competitors may enter the market.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent CA2986251 Details.
  2. WIPO. Patent Family and International Patent Application Data.
  3. Relevant scientific literature and prior art references.
  4. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent landscapes.

This detailed analysis aims to equip stakeholders with critical insights into the scope and patent landscape of CA2986251, facilitating informed strategic decisions in the competitive pharmaceutical arena.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.