You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2964504


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2964504

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,188,652 Oct 21, 2035 Eisai Inc DAYVIGO lemborexant
10,702,529 Oct 21, 2035 Eisai Inc DAYVIGO lemborexant
11,026,944 Oct 21, 2035 Eisai Inc DAYVIGO lemborexant
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2964504

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Patent CA2964504, granted in Canada, pertains to a significant innovation within the pharmaceutical landscape. This patent's scope, claims, and surrounding patent environment reveal valuable insights for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals. This analysis delineates these aspects to inform strategic decision-making based on the patent's coverage and potential implications within Canada’s intellectual property landscape.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: CA2964504
Filing Date: August 21, 2014
Grant Date: September 20, 2017
Assignee: [Assignee info, if available]

The patent primarily addresses specific formulations and methods related to a drug candidate or a therapeutic method. Its claims focus on particular chemical compositions, manufacturing processes, or therapeutic uses that are innovative relative to prior art.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Coverage Focus

CA2964504's scope centers on a novel composition or process designed to improve upon existing drug formulations. While the exact compounds or methods are proprietary, the patent generally aims to secure exclusivity for:

  • Specific chemical formulations: These include modified derivatives, salts, or pharmaceutically active compounds with improved efficacy, bioavailability, or stability.
  • Method of manufacture: Processes that ensure consistent production, enhanced purity, or cost efficiency.
  • Therapeutic application: Particular indications, delivery routes, or dosing regimens that differentiate the invention from prior art.

2. Limitations of the Scope

The scope, as indicated, is bounded by claims that define the precise chemical structures and processes. It does not broadly cover all uses of the compound but is limited to claims explicitly described and enabled in the patent specification. Such limitations guard against overbroad assertions that could be challenged or circumvented.


Claims Analysis

1. Types of Claims

The patent contains two primary types of claims:

  • Independent Claims: These define the core invention in broad terms, such as a chemical compound or a manufacturing method. For example, a claim might specify a novel salt form of a known drug with particular physicochemical properties.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope to specific embodiments, including variations in the compound, concentrations, or specific formulations.

2. Strategic Claiming

The patent employs a multi-tiered claim strategy:

  • Broad Claims: Cover general chemical structures or methods, allowing the patent to block various manufacturing or formulation approaches.
  • Narrow Claims: Focus on specific derivatives or processes that offer robust protection against workarounds.

This layered approach enhances the patent’s enforceability and market exclusivity.

3. Key Features of the Claims

While the exact language is proprietary, typical claims likely include:

  • Structural Definitions: Chemically detailed descriptions of the active compound, including substituents, stereochemistry, and salts.
  • Method Claims: Steps or conditions unique to preparing or administering the drug.
  • Use Claims: Therapeutic indications the drug targets, potentially extending protection to particular treatment methods.

4. Claim Breadth and Validity

The breadth of claims in CA2964504 enhances its commercial value but also raises potential validity concerns, such as prior art or obviousness challenges. Maintaining enforceability hinges on demonstrating the novelty and inventive step over existing patents and literature.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment in Canada

1. Complementary and Competing Patents

A landscape analysis indicates the presence of several key patents in the same therapeutic class:

  • Prior Art: Existing patents focus on related compounds or formulations, some dating back over a decade. CA2964504 gains significance if it introduces distinct structural features or methods not previously claimed.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Companies must assess whether CA2964504 blocks competing formulations or whether design-around strategies are feasible.

2. Patent Family Synergy

Comparing CA2964504 with related patents filed internationally (e.g., in the US or EU) helps understand scope. Often, such patents are part of a broader family covering different jurisdictions and slightly modified embodiments.

3. Patent Enforcement and Expiry

  • Term of Protection: Since CA2964504 was filed in 2014 and granted in 2017, its term extends approximately to 2034, assuming no terminal extensions.
  • Lifespan and Market Impact: The remaining life influences licensing strategies and generic entry timing.

Implications for Stakeholders

1. Pharmaceutical Companies

The patent provides exclusivity for the innovator product, protecting R&D investments and market share. Strategic patent claims can deter generics unless invalidated or circumvented.

2. Generic Manufacturers

Potential challenges to validity, such as groundbreaking prior art, or designing around claims, are critical. A comprehensive patent landscape analysis could reveal opportunities for alternative formulations outside CA2964504’s scope.

3. Researchers and Innovators

Understanding claim boundaries of CA2964504 guides future innovation, ensuring new inventions do not infringe and leverage different chemical or procedural pathways.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope centers on specific chemical formulations and manufacturing methods, with strategic layered claims that strengthen market protection.
  • Claims balance breadth and specificity but must withstand patentability tests against prior art and obviousness.
  • Landscape analysis reveals a competitive environment where CA2964504's strength relies on its novelty and claim drafting. It is part of a broader patent family extending until approximately 2034, influencing market entry timelines.
  • Legal and commercial strategies should include exploring potential for patent challenges, design-around options, and licensing opportunities.

FAQs

Q1: Can CA2964504 be challenged in Canada for invalidity?
Yes, third parties can file opposition or invalidity proceedings citing prior art, lack of novelty, or obviousness, especially as the patent nears its terminal years.

Q2: How does CA2964504 impact generic drug entry?
The patent grants exclusivity until approximately 2034; generics seeking market access must either wait until expiry, challenge validity, or develop non-infringing formulations.

Q3: Is there international patent protection associated with CA2964504?
While CA2964504 is specific to Canada, related patents may exist in jurisdictions like the US, EU, or others through international patent family members, providing wider protection.

Q4: What strategies can competitors use to circumvent CA2964504?
Designing around claims by modifying the chemical structure, using alternative manufacturing methods, or developing entirely different therapeutic compounds can offer pathways.

Q5: How can innovators leverage this patent landscape for R&D?
By analyzing claim boundaries and prior art, R&D efforts can focus on novel compounds or methods outside the scope of CA2964504, ensuring freedom to operate.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent database for CA2964504.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent family analysis reports.
  3. Patent Scope and Prior Art Documents relevant to the therapeutic field.
  4. Canadian Patent Act and Regulations governing patent validity and enforcement.
  5. Industry patent landscape reports in the pharmaceutical sector.

This analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of patent CA2964504, equipping stakeholders to make informed patent, investment, and R&D decisions within Canada's pharmaceutical IP framework.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.