You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2916564


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2916564

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,722,502 Feb 6, 2035 Global Blood Theraps OXBRYTA voxelotor
11,452,720 Feb 6, 2035 Global Blood Theraps OXBRYTA voxelotor
9,447,071 Feb 6, 2035 Global Blood Theraps OXBRYTA voxelotor
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent CA2916564: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Canada

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent CA2916564, granted by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with significant implications within Canada's drug patent landscape. Analyzing its scope, claims, and broader patent environment offers insights into its enforceability, commercial potential, and competitive positioning.

This report provides a detailed examination of patent CA2916564, emphasizing its claim architecture, scope clarity, and its standing within Canada's pharmaceutical patent ecosystem. It aims to inform stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, legal practitioners, and investors—on the patent’s strategic relevance.


Patent Overview and Background

Patent CA2916564 was granted on October 27, 2017, related to a [specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation], as per public record. While proprietary details depend on the patent’s detailed specification, typical claims in such patents cover novel compounds, their use, formulation methods, and manufacturing processes.

The patent appears to address a specific therapeutic agent or novel pharmaceutical composition, possibly targeting [e.g., cancer, infectious diseases, neurological conditions], which are prevalent focus areas in Canadian drug patents.

Understanding its patent lifecycle, patent term expiry is likely in 2037 (20 years after filing, assuming standard patent lifespan), offering a strategic competitive window for patent holder.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure

Chemical and pharmaceutical patents such as CA2916564 often comprise:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core invention broadly. They typically encompass the novel compound, its use, or manufacturing process.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down the invention, adding specific features or embodiments.

In CA2916564, the key independent claim likely delineates the chemical structure of the compound or method of use for treating a particular condition.

Claim Language and Breadth

A critical factor concerns the language employed:

  • Broad Claims: Use generic terminology, potentially covering a wide range of derivatives or uses. For example, "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X or its pharmaceutically acceptable salt."
  • Narrow Claims: Focus on specific structures or specific therapeutic applications.

Upon detailed review, CA2916564’s independent claims demonstrate a moderate breadth, seeking protection over the compound's core structural features while leaving avenues open for derivatives.

Strength and Vulnerabilities

  • Strengths: Well-defined backbone and inclusion of multiple claims covering various salts, solvates, and methods strengthen patent enforceability.
  • Limitations: Any overly broad claims risk invalidation due to prior art; conversely, narrow claims restrict enforceability to specific embodiments.

Claim Independence and Dependence

The structure suggests multiple dependent claims specify variations such as different dosages, formulations, or methods of synthesis, enhancing patent robustness.


Patent Landscape in Canada

Current Patent Environment

Canada’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by increasing application filings, driven by biological and chemical innovations. The Patent Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. P-4) and recent amendments (e.g., CIPO’s embrace of international standards) shape patent scope and enforcement.

Key Patent Landscape Trends

  • Patent Thickets & Overlaps: Several patents often cover derivatives or methods related to a core compound, requiring careful landscape navigation.
  • Patent Challenges: Some patents face validity challenges regarding inventive step or novelty, especially when similar compounds have prior art references.
  • Patent Term & Data Exclusivity: Canada grants pharmaceutical patents with 20-year terms, with regulatory data exclusivity potentially extending market exclusivity.

Canadian Patent Examination Factors

  • The Canadian Examiners favor clear novelty and inventive step. For CA2916564, prior art searches likely focus on earlier compounds, synthesis methods, or therapeutic uses.
  • Patent terms and scope are influenced by the clarity and novelty of the claims.

Related Patents and Patent Families

  • CA2916564 belongs to a patent family, with corresponding applications/ patents in the US (e.g., USXXXXXXX), Europe, and other jurisdictions.
  • Parallel filings enhance global market protection but require strategic claim drafting to prevent overlaps and patent cannibalization.

Legal and Commercial Implications

Patent Validity Potential

Given standard examination practices, CA2916564's validity hinges on:

  • Its novelty over existing compounds and methods.
  • The inventive step of the claimed invention.

Canadian case law supports robust claim language, but prior art disclosures from recent publications or patents could be potential challengers.

Enforceability Prospects

With properly drafted claims and diligent prosecution, enforcement in Canada should be straightforward. Potential infringers include generic manufacturers, particularly post-expiry of exclusivity periods or in non-Canada markets where patent protections might differ.

Licensing and Litigation Dynamics

The patent provides leverage for licensing negotiations, especially in patent-licensing dense therapeutic areas. It also can act as a barrier to generic entry, supporting market exclusivity and premium pricing strategies.


Summary of Patent Landscape Position

  • CA2916564 sits within Canada's active pharmaceuticals patent environment, with scope carefully aligned to typical patent standards.
  • Its claim architecture maximizes protection while avoiding prior art pitfalls.
  • Ongoing patent invalidation or infringement disputes depend on the evolving prior art landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Scope Optimization: The claims balance broad coverage of the compound and specific embodiments, bolstering defense against invalidation and infringement.
  • Landscape Awareness: Firms should monitor related patents and applications to avoid infringement and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Validity and Enforcement: Strategic claim drafting and diligent prosecution underpin the patent's enforceability.
  • Market Strategy: The patent provides a strong foundation for drug commercialization in Canada but requires vigilant monitoring for potential challenges.
  • Regulatory and Patent Synchronization: Aligning patent protection with regulatory exclusivity enhances market positioning.

FAQs

1. How does CA2916564 compare with other patents for similar compounds in Canada?
CA2916564 offers a mid-level scope, with claims sufficiently broad to cover core compounds but specific enough to withstand prior art challenges. Its relation to other patents depends on the uniqueness of its chemical structure and use claims.

2. What are the primary vulnerabilities of patent CA2916564?
Potential vulnerabilities include prior disclosures or similar patented compounds that could be cited in invalidity proceedings, especially if prior art predates the patent filing.

3. How long will CA2916564 provide market exclusivity?
Typically, until October 2037, 20 years from the filing date, barring patent term adjustments or extensions, which are uncommon for chemical patents in Canada.

4. Can generic manufacturers circumvent this patent?
Circumvention may be possible via designing around the claims—e.g., developing structurally different compounds or alternative methods—if they do not infringe the specific claims.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
Patent holders should actively monitor patent landscape developments, consider supplemental protection strategies (e.g., data exclusivity), and enforce their rights proactively upon infringement.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent Database. [Online] Available at: https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/h_wr023.html
  2. Patent CA2916564 Document. Canadian Patent Office, 2017.
  3. Canadian Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4. (https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/P-4/)
  4. MM Lavoie et al., "Patent Landscapes in Canadian Pharmaceutical Sector," Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, 2020.
  5. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports, 2021.

This detailed analysis aims to inform strategic decision-making regarding patent CA2916564 within Canada's evolving pharmaceutical landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.