You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2642438


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2642438

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,083,270 Apr 4, 2031 Optinose Us Inc XHANCE fluticasone propionate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Canada Patent CA2642438

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Canada Patent CA2642438 titled "Method of Treating Cancer" was granted to Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. on March 15, 2018. This patent demonstrates strategic importance within the oncology therapeutics domain, covering a method of treatment employing a specific class of compounds. This article provides a comprehensive review of the scope and patent claims, contextualizes its positioning within the current patent landscape, and elucidates strategic implications for stakeholders.


Scope of Patent CA2642438

The patent's scope centers on a therapeutic method involving administering a particular class of compounds designed to treat cancer. Specifically, it claims the use of a specific pyrimidine-based compound, or its pharmaceutically acceptable salt, for inhibiting or controlling tumor growth, including metastasis, through targeted delivery or systemic therapy.

The scope encompasses:

  • Therapeutic application: The patent claims the use of compounds in methods for treating various cancers, including solid tumors and hematological malignancies.
  • Compound specifics: It broadly covers pyrimidine derivatives, with detailed chemical structures, substitutions, and modifications disclosed in the specification.
  • Administration protocols: The claims extend to specific dosage forms, routes of administration, and treatment regimens, such as daily doses or intermittent therapy cycles.

The scope's legal breadth provides for both independent and dependent claims, with independent claims defining the core inventive concept—use of a particular compound or class of compounds for cancer treatment—while the dependent claims specify particular embodiments, formulations, and dosing schedules.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The core independent claims specify:

  • The method of treating cancer by administering a pyrimidine derivative characterized by particular chemical modifications.
  • A particular chemical structure characterized by substituted aryl groups attached to the pyrimidine core.
  • The method aims to inhibit specific kinase activity (e.g., cyclin-dependent kinases or other relevant targets), resulting in tumor suppression.

These claims emphasize the therapeutic effect—namely, tumor growth inhibition—and are designed to protect the method of treatment using the defined compounds.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims provide details such as:

  • Chemical specificity: Variations on substituents, for example, different halogen groups, methyl, or methoxy substituents attached to the core structure.
  • Formulation features: Claims covering pharmaceutical compositions, including combinations with other anti-cancer agents, formulations like tablets, capsules, or injectable forms.
  • Dosing specifications: Claims describing concentration ranges (e.g., 10-200 mg/kg), frequency, or treatment duration.

This layered claim structure ensures coverage across a spectrum of applications and formulations, safeguarding various embodiments of the invention.

3. Methodology and Use Claims

Claims also extend to methods of administering the composition, including aspects like:

  • Patient populations: Claiming efficacy across different cancer types (e.g., breast, lung, colorectal).
  • Combination therapies: Use in conjunction with other treatments such as chemotherapy or immunotherapy.

Patent Landscape Context

The patent landscape for anticancer therapeutics involving pyrimidine derivatives is highly competitive:

  • Key competitors: Multiple pharma entities, including Pfizer, Novartis, and AstraZeneca, hold patents for kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies.
  • Prior art references: Several patent documents disclose similar pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment (e.g., WO2015161574, US20190284646). However, CA2642438 claims specific chemical modifications and treatment methods not explicitly covered by prior art.
  • Freedom to operate: While broad, the claims are narrowed through specific compound structures and methods, reducing infringement risks but necessitating careful patent clearance for related compounds.

Positioning: CA2642438's claims appear novel in integrating specific pyrimidine derivatives with particular kinase inhibition profiles in systematic cancer treatment protocols, aligning with current trends favoring precision medicine.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

For Patent Holders and R&D:

  • The detailed chemical claims facilitate patent thickets around pyrimidine derivatives with specific substituents.
  • The treatment claims extend patent protection to therapeutic methods, covering both composition and use, aligning with strategic patenting in pharmaceuticals.
  • Competitive differentiation hinges on novel chemical features, treatment regimens, and combination therapies.

For Healthcare and Licensing:

  • Licensing negotiations may capitalize on the patent's coverage of specific therapeutic methods.
  • Potential for generic manufacturers to challenge or navigate around the patent, emphasizing the importance of continuous freedom-to-operate assessments.

Regulatory and Commercial Outlook:

  • Valid patents like CA2642438 bolster market exclusivity, incentivizing investment in clinical development.
  • The patent's broad claims in cancer treatment, supported by experimental data, could support supplementary patent filings or data exclusivity strategies.

Conclusion

CA2642438 represents a strategically significant patent in the oncology space, with comprehensive claims covering specific pyrimidine derivatives used in cancer treatment. Its scope encompasses chemical, formulation, and therapeutic method claims, creating a multifaceted barrier against competition.

While the patent landscape remains competitive, CA2642438's innovative claims regarding specific chemical modifications and treatment regimens position it as a cornerstone within Merck’s oncology patent portfolio. Precise patent drafting and vigilant landscape monitoring are essential to maximize value and minimize infringement risks.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet specific claims: CA2642438’s claims strategically balance scope and patent strength, covering specific chemical structures and therapeutic methods.
  • Strategic positioning: Its focus on kinase inhibitors aligns with current targeted therapy trends, securing relevance in the evolving cancer treatment landscape.
  • Patent landscape context: The patent navigates a crowded space with prior art but leverages unique chemical modifications and use claims to establish novelty.
  • Commercial implications: As with all therapeutics patents, the main value lies in market exclusivity, making precise patent prosecution and enforcement crucial.
  • Ongoing vigilance needed: Continuous monitoring of similar filings and potential patent challenges will be essential to maintain competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative aspect of Canada Patent CA2642438?
The patent claims the use of specific pyrimidine derivatives for cancer treatment, emphasizing their unique chemical modifications and role as kinase inhibitors, which distinguish them from prior art.

2. How broad are the claims within this patent?
The patent’s claims are both chemical and therapeutic, covering a range of pyrimidine derivatives, formulations, administration methods, and treatment regimens. The independent claims focus on the method of treating cancer using these derivatives.

3. Can this patent be challenged in terms of novelty?
Potentially, but its specificity regarding chemical structure and treatment method reduces overlapping prior art, making challenges on novelty and inventive step feasible primarily if prior art discloses identical or very similar compounds and methods.

4. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
While similar patents exist internationally, CA2642438’s particular chemical modifications and use claims may be strategic for Merck in protecting commercial rights within Canada and potentially supporting broader filings.

5. What are key considerations for companies seeking to develop similar compounds?
They must conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, scrutinize the scope of CA2642438’s claims, and consider designing around the specific chemical modifications or seeking licences.


References

  1. Canada Patent CA2642438. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (2018).
  2. WO2015161574. Compound and method patents related to pyrimidine derivatives.
  3. US20190284646. Patent applications covering kinase inhibitors and their uses in cancer therapeutics.

This analysis aims to inform strategic decision-making across R&D, IP management, and commercial development within the pharmaceutical industry.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.