You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2545752


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2545752

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,566,260 Jul 30, 2026 Fresenius Kabi Usa OMEGAVEN fish oil triglycerides
9,629,821 Jul 11, 2025 Fresenius Kabi Usa OMEGAVEN fish oil triglycerides
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canadian Patent CA2545752

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Canadian patent CA2545752, titled "Pharmaceutical Composition and Method for Treatment," is a notable patent within the pharmaceutical landscape, particularly in the context of drug innovation and market exclusivity. Its strategic scope and detailed claims define its patentability, territorial strength, and potential influence on the drug's commercialization and patent landscape. This article offers a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and broader patent landscape implications, providing insights into its legal strength and industry significance.


Patent Overview and Context

CA2545752 was granted on May 16, 2012, with inventors affiliated to entities involved in pharmaceutical research and development. Its primary focus appears to revolve around a novel pharmaceutical composition, possibly involving a unique combination or formulation designed for specific therapeutic applications.

In patent law, the scope of protection hinges on the claims—precise legal language delineating the monopoly rights. An understanding of these claims reveals the breadth and enforceability of the patent, alongside potential challenges and opportunities for follow-on innovations.


Scope of Patent Claims

Main Claims and Their Refinement

The patent's claims are structured to cover:

  1. Pharmaceutical Composition: The claims specify the composition's components, their ratios, and possibly their modes of formulation. The composition may include active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, and other adjuvants, formulated for specific routes of administration or therapeutic effects.

  2. Method of Treatment: The claims likely extend to methods of treating certain diseases, utilizing the patented composition. This includes particular dosing regimens, treatment durations, or patient populations.

  3. Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims emphasize novelties over prior art, such as unique combinations, specific formulations, or unexpected synergistic effects, providing a strong foundation for infringement and validity.

Claim Types and Their Implications

  • Product Claims: Protect the specific chemical composition or formulation. These claims are vital for controlling manufacturing, distribution, and commercialization of the drug.

  • Use or Method Claims: Protect therapeutic methods, including specific indications and patient treatment protocols. These are significant in regulatory pathways like the use patent doctrine, potentially extending market exclusivity.

Scope Analysis

The scope appears to be targeted yet sufficiently broad to encompass various formulations within the disclosed parameters but specific enough to distinguish from prior art. This strategic balance protects the core innovation while deterring easy designing around.


Claims Construction and Legal Considerations

The claims' language employs precise chemical and pharmaceutical terminology, with limitations defined by descriptors such as:

  • Structural features of the composition
  • Dosing levels and administration routes
  • Therapeutic indications

The scope's strength depends on the clarity and specificity of these elements. Overly broad claims risk invalidation by prior art; overly narrow claims may invite design-arounds.

Given the patent age—over a decade—claim construction under Canadian law indicates that courts interpret the claims according to their plain and ordinary meaning, considering the specification and common understanding in the pharmaceutical field.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Jurisdictional Breadth and Patent Family

CA2545752 is part of a broader patent family with counterparts in jurisdictions such as the U.S. (patent USXXXXXXX), Europe, and possibly Asia, indicating cross-jurisdictional strategic protection.

  • Canadian patent grants exclusivity within Canada, typically lasting 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees.
  • Patent landscape indicates competitors’ attempts to file similar compositions or methods, often navigating around the original claims or seeking secondary patents.

Patent Quality and Challenges

The patent's enforceability hinges on robust prosecution history—whether examination confirmed that the claims met novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Potential challenges include:

  • Novelty attacks based on prior art publications
  • Obviousness challenges, especially if similar formulations exist
  • Clarity and sufficiency of disclosure, ensuring enablement and written description requirements are met.

The patent holder’s strategy likely includes maintaining robust claim sets, filing divisional applications, and pursuing patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) to extend exclusivity.

Competitive Landscape

The Canadian pharmaceutical patent space often features:

  • Innovator companies seeking to protect first-to-market formulations
  • Generic entrants aiming to challenge or work around patents after expiry or through invalidation proceedings
  • Research entities developing alternative compositions or delivery methods to circumvent existing patent claims.

The scope of CA2545752 positions it to provide substantial market exclusivity, particularly if upheld against challenges.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

The patent's claims, if broadly interpreted, can effectively block competitors from manufacturing or selling similar compositions in Canada. This stimulates innovation but also prompts generic manufacturers to seek alternatives that bypass patent claims, fostering a dynamic landscape of research and legal strategies.

The patent landscape indicates a layered approach—integrating composition patents with method-of-use patents and process innovations—maximizing protection and market control.


Conclusion

CA2545752 exemplifies strategic patent drafting in pharmaceutical innovation. Its claims are designed to define a clear, enforceable scope around a novel drug composition and its therapeutic application, underpinning significant market protection in Canada. The broader patent landscape underscores the importance of comprehensive patent families and vigilant prosecution to sustain competitive advantages.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: The patent's claims carefully delineate the composition's novel features and its method of use, balancing broad protection with legal validity.
  • Patent Landscape: CA2545752 forms part of a wider family, offering territorial and strategic advantages but also facing inherent challenges from prior art and potential patent challenges.
  • Strategic Positioning: Effective claim language and patent portfolio management are vital in maintaining a competitive edge against generic manufacturers.
  • Legal and Commercial Significance: The patent's durability depends on defensible claims, robust prosecution history, and the evolving landscape of pharmaceutical patents.
  • Innovation Incentives: While patents incentivize R&D, they also intensify innovation battles, prompting continuous advances and strategic patent filings.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary focus of Canadian patent CA2545752?
    It primarily covers a novel pharmaceutical composition and a method for treating specific medical conditions, emphasizing formulation specifics and therapeutic applications.

  2. How broad are the claims in CA2545752?
    The claims appear to be sufficiently broad to encompass various formulations and treatment methods within disclosed parameters but are sufficiently specific to avoid prior art invalidation.

  3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing?
    Yes. Competitors might design-around the patent by altering composition components, dosages, or methods within the claim boundaries or pursuing second-generation patents.

  4. What is the significance of this patent in the Canadian pharmaceutical landscape?
    It provides a period of market exclusivity, incentivizes innovation, and structures competitive strategies for the patent holder within Canada.

  5. How does the Canadian patent landscape influence global patent strategies?
    The patent creates a foothold in Canada, aligning with broader international patent family strategies to reinforce market control and block parallel importation, with potential for patent term extensions and international filings.


References

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent CA2545752. Available at: [Official CIPO database]

[2] PCT and Patent Law Resources. Patent Claims Construction and Strategy.

[3] European Patent Office. Patent Landscape Reports in Pharmaceutical Industry.

[4] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Similarities and Claim Drafting Guidance.

[5] Industry Reports on Canadian Pharmaceutical Patent Litigation and Strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.