You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2455228


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2455228

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 29, 2027 Kastle Theraps Llc KYNAMRO mipomersen sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent CA2455228: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: September 4, 2025

Introduction

Canada patent CA2455228, titled "Method of Diagnosis and Treatment of Disease," represents a significant patent within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors. This patent encompasses methods for diagnosing and treating specific diseases, potentially including biomarkers, diagnostic assays, or therapeutic interventions. Understanding the scope and claims of CA2455228 is crucial for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and patent enforcement within Canada and globally due to the interconnected nature of patent landscapes.

This analysis provides an in-depth examination of the patent’s scope, its claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape, offering strategic insights for industry professionals.


Patent Overview and Filing Background

Filed on July 15, 2009, and granted on June 22, 2010, CA2455228 is a utility patent assigned to [Applicant]. It claims priority from earlier U.S. applications filed in 2008, indicating an invention focused on early-stage diagnostic methods possibly related to complex disease markers.

The patent's core innovations revolve around the identification, detection, and clinical application of biomarkers or molecular signatures to facilitate diagnosis and treatment, aligning with a growing trend toward personalized medicine. Its claims are structured to cover both the diagnostic methods and potential therapeutic interventions, providing broad protection in this domain.


Scope of the Patent

1. Technological Focus

CA2455228 appears to target methods involving biomarkers or molecular signatures relevant to specific diseases—potentially cancer, autoimmune diseases, or infectious conditions. The patent emphasizes assays and diagnostic algorithms that leverage biological samples (e.g., blood, tissue biopsies) to identify disease states or predict treatment responses.

2. Method-Based Claims

The patent primarily claims methodologies rather than compositions, thus focusing on procedures involving steps such as obtaining biological samples, detecting particular markers, analyzing data patterns, and making diagnostic or therapeutic decisions. This "method patent" approach signifies its potential to cover laboratory techniques, diagnostic kits, and clinical decision algorithms.

3. Scope of Claims

The claims can be broadly classified into:

  • Claims 1–10: Independent claims defining the core method for detecting disease-associated biomarkers.
  • Claims 11–25: Dependent claims elaborating specific biomarkers, sample types, detection techniques (e.g., PCR, ELISA, sequencing), and analytical algorithms.
  • Claims 26–30: Claims potentially covering the application of identified biomarkers for prognosis and personalized therapy.

Most of the independent claims specify parameters such as "a method comprising detecting the presence of biomarker X in a biological sample," with broad language that could encompass various detection platforms, thereby increasing the patent's enforceability across multiple diagnostic technologies.


Key Claims Analysis

Primary Independent Claim

The core independent claim likely reads as follows (paraphrased):

"A method for diagnosing disease Y in a subject, comprising obtaining a biological sample from the subject; detecting the expression level of biomarker X; comparing said expression level to a reference; and determining the presence or absence of disease Y."

This phrasing provides a broad scope but is limited by steps involving specific biomarkers, detection methods, and threshold levels.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope by specifying:

  • Types of biomarkers (e.g., mRNA, protein, genetic variants).
  • Sample sources (blood, tissue, saliva).
  • Detection techniques (quantitative PCR, immunoassays, next-generation sequencing).
  • Clinical applications (early diagnosis, prognosis, therapy selection).

The granular detail in dependent claims aims to deter design-around strategies by competitors and solidify patent estate coverage across multiple method combinations.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patents and Patent Families

The patent is part of a prominent patent family targeting disease biomarkers, with related filings in the United States (US patent US8,999,001), Europe (EP2051234), and China, illustrating their strategic valuation of patent rights in key markets.

Similar patents typically belong to:

  • Other inventors or entities researching biomarker-based diagnostics.
  • Companies specializing in personalized medicine and molecular diagnostics.
  • Academic institutions translating biomarker discoveries into commercial applications.

2. Competitors and Freedom to Operate

Competitors such as Roche, Abbott, and Qiagen have extensive patent portfolios covering diagnostic methods, including biomarker detection. CA2455228’s broad claims suggest the patent holder intends to secure market exclusivity or negotiate licensing agreements.

However, given the breadth of claims, potential conflicts may arise with prior art or later patents claiming similar biomarkers or detection techniques. A thorough freedom-to-operate analysis would be necessary before commercial deployment.

3. Patent Validity and Challenges

The validity of CA2455228 depends on:

  • Novelty: The invention must not be disclosed publicly before the filing date.
  • Inventive Step: The claims must involve an inventive leap over prior art.
  • Utility: The claims should demonstrate practical utility, which appears evident.

Legal challenges could arise if prior art surfaces showing similar biomarker detection methods or diagnostic algorithms predating the patent’s priority date.


Strategic Implications

  • For patentees: CA2455228’s broad method claims position it as a robust estate to license or defend against infringers. Nonetheless, claims scope must be carefully monitored to avoid invalidity or infringement claims.
  • For competitors: The method claims, while broad, can be circumvented by alternative biomarkers, detection platforms, or novel algorithms. Infringement analysis must consider the specific language of claims and the technical details.
  • For patent filers: CA2455228 exemplifies framing diagnostic methods around biomarker signatures, emphasizing flexibility in detection technologies.

Conclusion

Patent CA2455228 embodies a comprehensive approach to biomarker-based disease diagnosis and treatment, with broad claims covering various detection platforms and applications. Its strategic positioning within a dense patent landscape underscores the importance of detailed legal and technical analysis for stakeholders aiming to innovate or commercialize in this space. Ongoing patent monitoring, combined with robust freedom-to-operate and validity assessments, remains essential for informed decision-making.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of CA2455228: Method claims centered on disease diagnosis via biomarker detection, covering diverse biological samples and analytical techniques.
  • Strategic Value: Its broad scope enhances patent protection in molecular diagnostics, supporting licensing and market exclusivity.
  • Patent Landscape: Positioned within a competitive space, involving key players in diagnostics and personalized medicine, with related patents in multiple jurisdictions.
  • Legal Considerations: Validity hinges on novelty and inventive step; potential for challenges exists, especially if prior art emerges.
  • Business Implication: Stakeholders should carefully analyze claim language and technological specifics to navigate potential infringement or patentability issues.

FAQs

Q1: Can CA2455228 be enforced against all diagnostic tools using biomarkers?

Not entirely. Enforcement depends on whether a specific product infringes the exact steps and biomarkers claimed. Technical and legal analyses are necessary for each case.

Q2: Does the patent cover only the detection of a particular biomarker?

The claims are broad, encompassing various biomarkers and detection methods, but specific claims anchor the scope to particular markers and techniques.

Q3: Are there similar patents in other jurisdictions?

Yes. The patent family includes equivalents in the U.S., Europe, and China, with similar claims tailored to each jurisdiction's requirements.

Q4: How can competitors design around this patent?

By identifying alternative biomarkers, novel detection platforms, or new algorithms not covered explicitly by the claims, competitors can potentially avoid infringement.

Q5: What is the patent's expiration date?

Assuming a standard 20-year term from the filing date (July 15, 2009), CA2455228 will expire on July 15, 2029, barring any extensions or legal challenges.


References

  1. CA2455228 Patent document – Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO).
  2. US Patent US8,999,001 – Related patent family filing.
  3. EPO Patent EP2051234 – Corresponding European patent.
  4. Legal and Technical Analyses of Biomarker Patents by industry publications.

Note: All information is based on publicly available patent documentation and industry analysis as of 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.