You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0712936


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0712936

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 10, 2028 Mdd Us XADAGO safinamide mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 8, 2027 Mdd Us XADAGO safinamide mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Drug Patent BRPI0712936

Last updated: August 24, 2025

Introduction

Brazilian patent BRPI0712936 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, with potential implications across therapeutic areas depending on its claims. Understanding its scope, the breadth of protection, and the patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals—seeking strategic positioning within the Brazilian patent environment.

This detailed analysis examines the scope and claims of BRPI0712936, contextualizes its patent landscape in Brazil and internationally, and evaluates potential challenges, infringement considerations, and competitive implications.

Patent Overview and Context

BRPI0712936, filed with the Brazilian Patent Office (INPI), is categorized as a pharmaceutical patent filing. It potentially covers a novel active compound, formulation, or method relating to drug development—an arena with high patent activity in Brazil, aligned with global trends in biomedical innovation.

The patent's validity, scope, and enforceability depend upon the precise claims, which define legal exclusivities. Its landscape reflects Brazil’s evolving pharmaceutical patent system, influenced by the Patents Law No. 9,279/1990, and subsequent amendments aligning with TRIPS commitments.

Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

1. Nature of Claims

The patent encompasses independent and dependent claims that delineate the boundaries of legal protection. The scope hinges largely on the breadth of these claims:

  • Independent Claims: Typically articulate the core inventive concept—such as a novel chemical entity, a specific pharmaceutical formulation, or a process for manufacturing.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, modifications, or improvements.

2. Key Claim Elements

While the exact text of the claims is necessary for comprehensive analysis, typical patent claims in this domain include:

  • Chemical Structure and Composition: Definitions of novel molecular entities, including chemical formulas, stereochemistry, and specific substitutions.
  • Method of Use or Treatment: Claims covering therapeutic methods, indications, or administration routes.
  • Formulation and Dosage: Claims related to specific formulations, excipients, or delivery systems enhancing bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.
  • Preparation Process: Claims asserting novel synthesis routes or purification methods.

3. Breadth and Limitations

The patent's protection scope depends heavily on how broad the claims are drafted:

  • Broad Claims: Encompass a wide range of compounds or applications, potentially covering multiple derivatives or indications.
  • Narrow Claims: Focused on specific compounds or specific methods, offering limited protection but easier to defend.

The scope may be influenced by prior art, inventive step, and the examination quality. Brazilian practice emphasizes thorough evaluation of inventive step and novelty, which may restrict overly broad claims during prosecution.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning in Brazil

1. Brazil’s Pharmaceutical Patent Dynamics

Brazil's pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Stringent examination practices emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Limited exceptions for some defending generic entry, notably the Bolar exemption.
  • Healthy pipeline of patent applications, often including foreign filings seeking Brazilian protection.

Notably, the Brazilian patent office has historically scrutinized pharmaceutical patents more rigorously than other jurisdictions, especially after the 2011 implementation of the management of patent examination to curb evergreening.

2. Patent Family and International Landscape

The patent likely belongs to a broader patent family if based on a World Patent or PCT filing, which could include filings in key jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and China.

  • Infringement Risks: Given the patent's claims, infringement could occur if a competing product or process falls within the scope defined.
  • Prior Art and Patentability: The patentability assessment would have considered existing chemical compounds, formulations, or methods, shaping the scope of its claims.

3. Competitor Overview and Patent Clusters

  • Key Players: Multinational corporations and local companies advancing similar compounds or formulations.
  • Patent Clusters: Overlapping patents around the same chemical class or therapeutic area, potentially leading to freedom-to-operate challenges.

4. Patent Term and Maintenance

Brazilian patents provide 20 years from the filing date, with possible extensions in certain cases like pediatric exclusivity. Adequate maintenance fees ensure enforceability.

Legal and Commercial Considerations

1. Patent Validity and Enforcement

  • Potential Challenges: Third parties may challenge validity through nullity actions based on lack of novelty or inventive step, especially if prior art evidence surfaces.
  • Monitoring and Litigation: Enforcement involves demonstrating infringement based on claims interpretation, with potential for patent lapses if maintenance fees expire.

2. Licensing and Out-licensing

  • Opportunities exist for licensing if the patent covers proprietary compounds or processes with attractive therapeutic indications.
  • Strategic collaborations may leverage the patent's scope to expand market access.

3. Compulsory Licensing Risks

Brazilian law permits compulsory licensing under specific conditions, such as public health needs, which could impact patent holders.

Key Elements for Strategic Stakeholders

  • Patent Strength: Broad claims coupled with strong inventive steps enhance defensibility.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Thorough landscape analysis is required to avoid infringement, especially in overlapping chemical or therapeutic spaces.
  • Patent Lifecycle Management: Timely maintenance and continuous innovation prolong market exclusivity.
  • Legal Vigilance: Monitoring patent validity and possible third-party challenges is essential.

Conclusion: Significance of BRPI0712936

Patent BRPI0712936 exemplifies Brazil’s efforts to protect innovative pharmaceuticals, with a scope influenced heavily by claims drafting and prior art considerations. Its landscape underscores the need for strategic IP management, particularly in a jurisdiction balancing innovation incentives with generic entry.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Clarity and Breadth: The patent’s scope relies critically on how broad and precisely drafted its claims are; broad claims increase protection but may face greater scrutiny.
  • Brazil’s Patent Examination Rigorousness: Expect robust examination focusing on novelty and inventive step, especially for pharmaceuticals.
  • Landscape and Overlap: The patent exists within a competitive landscape featuring similar compounds and formulations; thorough patent landscaping is vital to navigate infringement risks.
  • Lifecycle and Legal Risks: Regular maintenance and vigilance for nullity actions or licensing opportunities are essential for maximizing patent value.
  • Strategic Positioning: Combining patent protection with continuous innovation and landscape monitoring can secure a competitive advantage in Brazil's evolving pharmaceutical market.

FAQs

Q1: How does Brazil’s patent law influence the scope of pharmaceutical patents like BRPI0712936?
A1: Brazil’s law emphasizes clear claims, novelty, and inventive step. Overly broad claims may face challenges, while well-structured claims aligned with prior art can strengthen enforceability.

Q2: Can third parties challenge the validity of BRPI0712936?
A2: Yes. Nullity suits can be filed based on lack of novelty, inventive step, or other grounds, potentially invalidating the patent if successful.

Q3: What strategies can patent owners employ in Brazil to extend the patent’s commercial viability?
A3: Regular maintenance, patent family expansion, and ongoing innovation can prolong market exclusivity, alongside vigilant landscape monitoring.

Q4: How significant is patent landscaping in Brazil’s pharmaceutical market?
A4: It is crucial for avoiding infringement, identifying licensing opportunities, and understanding competitive positioning given the dense patent environment.

Q5: What are the implications of Brazil’s Bolar exemption for pharmaceutical patents?
A5: It permits generic manufacturers to use patented inventions for regulatory approval during patent term, facilitating timely market entry once patents expire.


Sources:

[1] INPI Patent Database
[2] Brazilian Patent Law No. 9,279/1996
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Reports on Brazil
[4] Recent patent adjudication and litigation cases in Brazil related to pharmaceuticals

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.