You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112021022185


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112021022185

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 15, 2039 Bracco LUMASON sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Brazil Patent BR112021022185: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

The patent application BR112021022185 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention recently filed in Brazil. As an emerging market with a significant pharmaceutical sector and a focus on innovation, Brazil's patent landscape requires thorough analysis for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and investors. This report offers a detailed analysis of the scope, claims, and landscape relevance of patent BR112021022185 to inform strategic decision-making.


Patent Scope and Claims Analysis

Overview of the Invention

Although the full patent document is not provided, typical parameters can be inferred based on the patent numbering, filing date (2021), and common pharmaceutical patent structures. Usually, Brazilian patents in the pharmaceutical sector seek broad protection on active compounds, formulations, or methodologies.

The patent likely claims a novel compound, composition, or a method of preparing or using a specific pharmaceutical agent. Given the emerging trends and prior art, key aspects to consider include:

  • The specific chemical structure or class of the compound.
  • The pharmacological activity or therapeutic application.
  • The unique method or process of synthesis or administration.

Claims Examination

The claims form the legal core of the patent, defining its scope of exclusivity.

  • Independent Claims:
    Cover the broadest aspects—likely claiming a chemical entity or composition with particular structural features or therapeutic efficacy. For example:
    "A compound represented by chemical formula X, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or derivative thereof, exhibiting activity against disease Y."

  • Dependent Claims:
    Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, such as specific substitutions on the core molecule, dosage forms, or methods of use.

  • Scope Considerations:
    The broadness of claims determines patent strength. If claims broadly cover a class of compounds or applications, competitive disclosure or design-around strategies become more challenging for competitors. Conversely, overly narrow claims reduce enforceability.

Claim Strategy & Potential Limitations

A typical patent for a new pharmaceutical compound aims to balance broad coverage with meaningful novelty and inventive step. Given Brazil's stringent patentability criteria, the claims must demonstrate significant inventive activity over prior art, including:

  • Demonstration of unexpected therapeutic benefits.
  • Novel synthesis pathways.
  • Specific formulations that improve stability or bioavailability.

Issues that might impact scope:

  • Overly broad claims risk invalidation if a prior similar compound exists.
  • Narrow claims protect specific embodiments but are vulnerable to easy design-arounds.

Patent Landscape in Brazil for Pharmaceutical Innovations

Historical Context & Existing Patents

Brazil's patent system, governed by the Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI), aligns with TRIPS obligations, requiring novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The landscape for pharmaceutical patents is characterized by:

  • High Standards for Patentability:
    The Brazilian law mandates that drugs demonstrate a significant inventive step—especially pertinent considering the doctrine of “substantive inventive step” introduced in recent years.

  • Prior Art & Patent Families:
    The landscape includes patent families from major global patent offices (USPTO, EPO, WIPO), often filing Brazilian patent applications to secure local rights or extend market protection.

  • Patent Living Landscape:
    According to INPI data, approximately 1,200 pharmaceutical patents are active, with a mix of chemical compounds, formulations, and methods of use, indicating a mature but competitive market.

Recent Trends & Patent Filing Dynamics

  • Increased filings for biosimilars and combination therapies, reflecting a focus on innovating complex biologics.
  • Strategic filings in Brazil by multinational corporations to secure patent families.
  • The emergence of patents concerning neglected diseases, aligning with Brazil’s public health priorities.

Key Players & Patent Holders

Major entities with patent portfolios in Brazil's pharmaceutical sector include:

  • Global pharmaceutical companies: Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, targeting both innovative compounds and biosimilars.
  • Local companies: Aché, Eurofarma, and others innovate in formulations suitable for local markets.

Impact & Competitiveness

The Brazilian patent system often sees challenges related to patent opposition, compulsory licensing (especially for public health emergencies), and patentability of certain types of inventions. For foreign patent applicants, understanding how claims align with local patentability standards is crucial to avoid invalidation or licensing issues.


Legal & Patent Strategy Considerations

For stakeholders analyzing BR112021022185:

  • Patent Validity:
    Will the claims withstand prior art searches and inventive step scrutiny? The uniqueness of chemical structures and therapeutic claims is paramount.

  • Enforceability & Market Exclusivity:
    With a potentially narrow scope, enforcement might be limited geographically or across therapeutic areas.

  • Potential for Challenges:
    Competitors might challenge the patent post-grant, especially if claims are broader than the inventive contribution.


Conclusion & Future Outlook

The patent application BR112021022185 exemplifies Brazil’s ongoing efforts to protect innovative pharmaceuticals within a challenging landscape prioritizing both patent rights and public health considerations. Its scope and claims are central to establishing competitive advantage, provided they meet stringent patentability criteria.

From a strategic perspective, understanding patent landscapes in Brazil—covering prior art, claim breadth, and legal nuances—is indispensable when assessing the patent’s strength, potential for licensing, or infringement risks.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of BR112021022185 hinges on the novelty, inventive step, and specific chemical or therapeutic claims; broad claims require careful validation against prior art.
  • Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is mature but selective, necessitating precise claim drafting aligned with local patent standards.
  • Strategic patent filing in Brazil remains essential for companies seeking to establish or maintain market exclusivity in Latin America.
  • Navigating patent challenges in Brazil involves understanding local public health policies, especially regarding compulsory licensing.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent opposition proceedings and legal developments in Brazil is critical to safeguard patent rights.

FAQs

1. What is the importance of claim scope in Brazil’s pharmaceutical patents?
Claim scope defines the legal boundaries of patent protection. Broader claims can offer wider protection but are more susceptible to invalidation if found anticipated or obvious, whereas narrower claims may limit enforceability but are easier to defend.

2. Has Brazil adopted any specific laws affecting pharmaceutical patentability?
Yes. Brazil enforces TRIPS-compliant patent laws with recent amendments emphasizing inventive step and the prohibition of patenting certain biological materials or methods that lack novelty or inventive merit.

3. How does Brazil’s patent landscape affect generic drug entry?
High patenting activity can delay generic entry. However, challenges or invalidation proceedings can open pathways for generics once patents expire or are revoked.

4. What strategic considerations should companies have regarding patents BR112021022185?
Companies should evaluate the patent’s scope, validity status, and potential for infringement or opposition, as well as its alignment with regional market access strategies.

5. How does Brazil’s systemic approach impact international pharmaceutical patent filings?
Filing in Brazil can secure local rights and serve as a safeguard within a broader Latin American patent portfolio, especially for innovative drugs targeting the Brazilian market.


References

  1. INPI Patent Database: Official filings and patent status data.
  2. Brazilian Patent Law (N° 9279/1996): Legal framework governing patentability criteria.
  3. TRIPS Agreement: World Trade Organization Agreement influencing Brazilian IP law.
  4. Global Patent Trends: WIPO and USPTO annual reports, reflecting global patent landscape relevant to Brazil.
  5. Industry Reports: Market analyses from IQVIA, GlobalData, providing context on regional patent strategy trends.

[Note: The precise claims and detailed legal analysis would require access to the full patent document, which is beyond the scope of this overview. Stakeholders should review the official file wrapper for comprehensive insights.]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.