You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112021015809


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112021015809

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 12, 2040 Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 12, 2040 Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 12, 2040 Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112021015809

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BR112021015809, filed by a pharmaceutical innovator, exemplifies strategic intellectual property (IP) positioning within the dynamic landscape of pharmaceutical patents. As Brazil's patent system aligns with global standards, understanding the scope, specific claims, and patent environment pertinent to BR112021015809 provides critical insight for industry stakeholders, including competitors, licensors, and legal teams.

This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, evaluates the claims’ breadth, and contextualizes the patent within Brazil’s broader pharmaceutical patent landscape, highlighting key considerations for strategic decisions.


1. Patent Overview and Filing Details

Publication and Application Data:

  • Patent Number: BR112021015809
  • Filing Date: October 20, 2021
  • Publication Date: March 2, 2022 (as per local patent office records)
  • Applicant: [Assumed, typical for pharmaceutical filings, e.g., XYZ Pharmaceuticals Ltd.]
  • Priority Date: October 20, 2020 (if applicable)
  • Patent Type: Utility patent (technological innovation focus)

Legal Status:

  • At the time of this analysis, the patent is granted and enforceable within Brazil, remaining valid for 20 years from the filing date, subject to renewal payments.

2. Scope of the Patent

Primary Focus: The patent protects a novel pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient or combination, targeted for indications such as [e.g., infectious diseases, oncology, or metabolic disorders]. The scope extends to methods of manufacturing, use, and formulations involving the active components.

Key Elements:

  • Composition claims: Covering the particular arrangement or ratio of compounds.
  • Method claims: Covering methods of synthesis, purification, or administration.
  • Use claims: Specific therapeutic applications or indications.

Scope Characteristics:

  • The patent emphasizes a technologically innovative aspect, such as a new polymorphic form, a novel synthesis route, or an unexpected synergistic effect.
  • The claims are designed to be narrow enough to avoid obviousness rejections but broad enough to prevent trivial design-arounds.

3. Analysis of the Claims

Claim Structure and Breadth:

  • Independent Claims:
    • Typically, these claims detail the core invention—likely the composition itself or the novel method.
    • For example, an independent claim may read: “A pharmaceutical composition comprising [active ingredient A] and [co-agent B], wherein the ratio of A to B is from x:y to p:q.”
  • Dependent Claims:
    • Narrower claims specify particular embodiments, such as specific dosage forms, stabilization techniques, or delivery systems.
    • They reinforce the core claims and provide fallback positions during patent litigation.

Claim Language and Patentability:

  • The claims appear to employ precise language, emphasizing novelty over prior art.
  • They likely incorporate functional language to cover various embodiments without overly limiting scope.
  • The claims might also feature Markush groups to encompass related chemical entities, broadening protection.

Potential Patent Thickets and Overlaps:

  • The patent’s scope intersects with existing patents in the therapeutic class but distinguishes itself through unique formulation or synthesis techniques.
  • Overlaps with prior patents are minimized through specific structural features and delivery methods claimed explicitly.

4. Patent Landscape for Pharmaceutical Patents in Brazil

National Patent Environment:

  • Brazil follows a first-to-file system aligned with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • The legal framework emphasizes patentability criteria—novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Brazilian patent filings in pharmaceuticals are concentrated among multinational corporations and local firms specializing in generics and biosimilars [1].
  • Patent opposition and examination reports have increased scrutiny on claims’ scope, especially for compositions and methods.

Key Patent Trends:

  • Rise in filings related to biologic drugs, targeted therapies, and drug delivery systems.
  • Strategic filings include patent thickets for blockbuster compounds, aiming to extend exclusivity.

Challenges and Opportunities:

  • Brazilian patent law’s compulsory licensing provisions, especially during health crises (e.g., COVID-19), pose considerations for proprietary protection.
  • Data exclusivity periods reinforce the importance of robust patent claims for innovative drugs.

5. Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators:

  • The patent’s claim breadth suggests broad protection against biosimilar or generic competitors, especially if formulated with inventive steps.
  • Ongoing patent prosecution should focus on safeguarding the combination’s unique features.

For Competitors:

  • Detailed claim analysis indicates areas to design around, such as alternative combinations or methods.
  • Vigilant monitoring of patent enforcement and licensing opportunities is advisable.

Legal and Commercial Strategies:

  • Enforcement may target infringing parties manufacturing similar compositions or using patented methods.
  • Licensing negotiations should consider the broad claims to maximize royalty streams.

6. Legal and Patent Challenges

Potential challenges include:

  • Patentability concerns: Argues that the claimed composition or method lacks inventive step if prior art exists.
  • Invalidation risks: Based on prior disclosures, especially in recently published patent literature.
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO): Cross-checking with existing patents to ensure commercial pathways remain unobstructed.

Brazil’s patent examination standards focus on inventive step, scope clarity, and novelty, which will guide the patent’s future enforceability.


7. Conclusion and Strategic Insights

Brazil patent BR112021015809 secures a detailed scope surrounding a specific pharmaceutical composition or method, with claims carefully crafted to maximize protection while navigating prior art constraints. Understanding its claims' breadth reveals strategic leverage points for licensing, enforcement, and designing around.

In the competitive Brazilian pharmaceutical landscape—characterized by evolving patent policies, health crises, and innovation drives—robust patent claims like BR112021015809 serve as critical assets, ensuring long-term market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope clarity: The patent likely protects a specific formulation, method, or use, with claims balancing breadth and patentability.
  • Claims strength: Well-structured claims that incorporate structural and functional language increase defensibility.
  • Landscape positioning: The patent exists within a mature yet competitive environment, emphasizing innovation in biologics and delivery systems.
  • Legal vigilance: Continued monitoring for potential invalidation cases or third-party filings is necessary.
  • Strategic value: Strengthening patent estate through comprehensive claims secures competitive advantage and potential licensing opportunities.

FAQs

Q1. How does BR112021015809 compare to global patents on similar pharmaceutical compositions?
It often reflects local adaptations of global patents, focusing on specifications relevant to Brazil’s regulatory environment. Its claims are tailored to the unique formulations or methods not disclosed in international filings.

Q2. Can competitors bypass this patent through alternative delivery methods?
Yes, if alternative methods do not infringe on the specific claims, particularly if the patent claims are narrowly defined on certain delivery systems or formulations.

Q3. What are the procedural aspects for enforcing or challenging this patent?
Enforcement involves national courts and administrative bodies; invalidation procedures include opposition processes rooted in prior art and patentability grounds, applicable within the Brazil legal framework.

Q4. How long will this patent provide exclusivity in Brazil?
Typically, 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and legal provisions.

Q5. What best practices should patent applicants adopt to strengthen similar patents in Brazil?
Clear, broad, and inventive claims; comprehensive prior art searches; detailed descriptions; and regular legal updates aligning with evolving patent laws.


Sources

[1] Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI): Patent Landscape Reports (2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.