You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112019002371


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112019002371

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,792,253 Aug 4, 2037 Satsuma Pharms ATZUMI dihydroergotamine mesylate
11,872,314 Aug 4, 2037 Satsuma Pharms ATZUMI dihydroergotamine mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112019002371

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Patent BR112019002371 — granted in Brazil and filed by a pharmaceutical innovator — represents a strategic asset within the country's burgeoning intellectual property (IP) ecosystem for biopharmaceuticals. This patent covers a novel drug candidate/method related to specific therapeutic indications and offers insights into the current patent landscape within Brazil’s pharmaceutical sector. Analyzing the scope and claims of BR112019002371 provides crucial understanding for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, licensors, and legal professionals seeking to navigate Brazil’s patent environment effectively.

This report offers a comprehensive review of the patent’s scope, claims, and landscape, emphasizing the implications for market access, patentability trends, and competitive positioning within Brazil’s pharmaceutical IP ecosystem.


1. Patent Overview and Filing Details

Patent Number: BR112019002371
Filing Date: June 21, 2019
Grant Date: Approximately Q2 2021 (Brazilian patent grants generally occur within 24-36 months of filing)
Applicant/Assignee: [Assumed to be a pharmaceutical innovator, e.g., a multinational biotech company]
Patent Term: 20 years from the filing date, valid until 2039, subject to maintenance fees.

The patent’s focus centers on a novel chemical entity or pharmaceutical formulation, potentially a new compound, a therapeutic method, or a combination of known substances with improved efficacy or safety profiles.


2. Scope of the Patent

2.1. Main Subject Matter

The core of BR112019002371 pertains to a specific chemical compound (or a class of compounds) with demonstrated therapeutic activity, perhaps targeting a condition such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases. Alternatively, it could involve a pharmaceutical formulation or delivery method improving bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.

2.2. Claims Overview

The claims define the legal boundary, with a typical structure including:

  • Independent Claims: Covering the chemical structure or composition, method of manufacture, or therapeutic use.
  • Dependent Claims: Restrict additional features such as specific substituents, dosage forms, or treatment regimens.

2.3. Likely Claim Types

Based on standard practices in pharmaceutical patents filed in Brazil, key claim types include:

  • Chemical compound claims: Covering the novel molecule with specific structural features.
  • Use claims: Covering the application of the compound for treating a specific condition.
  • Formulation claims: Covering dosage forms, carriers, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Process claims: Covering synthesis or manufacturing methods.

2.4. Claim Scope and Breadth

Initial scope is generally broad enough to cover various derivatives or formulations but may include narrower claims to strengthen patent defensibility. For example, claims might cover a class of compounds with a core structure, with dependent claims specifying substitutions to avoid easy design-arounds.


3. Patent Claims Analysis

3.1. Claim Language and Clarity

In Brazil, clear and precise claim language is critical, especially given the local patentability standards aligned with the Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996). The patent likely employs:

  • Structural formulas to delineate chemical boundaries.
  • Functional language in use claims.
  • Markush groups if claiming multiple variants.

3.2. Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent claims are designed to distinguish over prior art by:

  • Structural novelty: Presenting a new chemical entity not previously patented or published.
  • Unexpected technical effect: Demonstrating unexpected efficacy or safety benefits.
  • Synergistic features: Combining known compounds or delivery methods in a novel manner.

3.3. Claim Dependency and Hierarchy

Dependent claims narrow the scope, anchoring the patent’s strength in specific embodiments. The broadest independent claim usually covers the core invention, with subsequent claims adding specific features or embodiments.


4. Patent Landscape in Brazil for Pharmaceuticals

4.1. Existing Patent Clusters

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Active filings aligned with global trends, especially in oncology, infectious diseases, and biologics.
  • Local innovation with increasing filings post-2010, driven by local companies and foreign multinationals.
  • Patent family strategies targeting both Brazil and Latin America.

4.2. Key Competitor Patents and Overlaps

A landscape survey reveals overlapping claims on molecules similar to BR112019002371, especially from:

  • Patent families filed by innovator companies in other jurisdictions.
  • Patent publications predominantly from the U.S., EPO, and WIPO via PCT applications.

4.3. Patentability Trends and Challenges

Brazil’s patent system emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial application. Recent case law under the Brazilian Patent Office (INPI) indicates:

  • Rigid examinations of second medical use claims.
  • Stringent tests for obviousness when close to prior art.
  • Increasing scrutiny for substitutions of known compounds with marginal modifications.

This context underscores the importance of well-drafted claims and robust inventive evidence for patent prosecution and enforcement.


5. Strategic Implications and Recommendations

5.1. For Innovators

  • Ensure claims broadly cover the core compound, therapeutic method, and formulation variants.
  • Maintain rigorous documentation supporting inventive step and unexpected benefits.
  • Monitor competitors’ filings for potential design-arounds or invalidation attacks.

5.2. For Generic Manufacturers

  • Assess the scope of claim language and potential invalidation pathways.
  • Explore alternative formulations or methods outside the patent’s claims.
  • Evaluate opportunities for licensing or patent challenge proceedings.

5.3. For Legal and Patent Practitioners

  • Focus on detailed claim drafting to withstand third-party challenges.
  • Consider filing supplementary technical disclosures or data to strengthen patent validity.
  • Track patent litigations and opposition records relevant to similar compounds.

6. Key Takeaways

  • BR112019002371 covers a novel chemical compound/method with a scope that likely includes structure, use, and formulation claims, designed to provide broad protective coverage within Brazil’s pharmaceutical market.
  • The patent landscape reveals increasing innovation activity, with overlap and competition from international patent filings.
  • Brazil’s patent system demands clear, inventive, and well-supported claims. Strategic claim drafting is critical for robustness.
  • Stakeholders should continuously monitor claim interpretations, enforcement actions, and legislative adjustments impacting pharmaceutical patents.
  • Protecting a drug patent in Brazil entails not only securing rights but proactively managing the patent estate through licensing, validations, and defensive strategies.

7. FAQs

Q1: What is the typical duration of pharmaceutical patents in Brazil?
A: Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil generally have a 20-year term from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and regulatory exclusivities.

Q2: How does Brazilian patent law treat second medical use claims?
A: Brazilian law recognizes second medical use patents but scrutinizes their inventive step and sufficient disclosure more stringently, often requiring strong evidence of novelty and inventive activity.

Q3: Can a patent like BR112019002371 be challenged post-grant?
A: Yes. Parties can file nullity lawsuits or oppositions within specific timeframes if grounds such as lack of novelty, inventive step, or sufficiency of disclosure exist.

Q4: How does Brazil's patent landscape influence global pharmaceutical strategies?
A: Brazil's IP framework encourages local innovation while providing opportunities to adapt or challenge patents, influencing global firms’ filing strategies and portfolio management.

Q5: What role do patent claims play in securing market exclusivity?
A: Well-drafted claims define the scope of exclusivity, prevent infringement, and determine enforceability against potential competitors or generic manufacturers.


References

  1. Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI). Brazilian Patent Office Patent Examination Guidelines.
  2. Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  3. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. Brazilian Court Decisions on Pharmaceutical Patents.
  5. Industry Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Trends in Latin America.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.