You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112017008097


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112017008097

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,456,396 Oct 19, 2035 Oyster Point Pharma TYRVAYA varenicline tartrate
11,224,598 Oct 19, 2035 Oyster Point Pharma TYRVAYA varenicline tartrate
11,903,941 Oct 19, 2035 Oyster Point Pharma TYRVAYA varenicline tartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112017008097

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian Patent BR112017008097 concerns a pharmaceutical invention designed to address specific therapeutic needs within the medicinal landscape. This detailed analysis evaluates the scope of the patent, its claims, and the broader patent landscape influencing its enforceability and strategic position within Brazil and potentially global markets. Understanding these elements is critical for pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal practitioners operating within Brazil’s evolving intellectual property environment.


Patent Overview

Brazilian Patent BR112017008097 pertains to a formulation, compound, or method related to a specific therapeutic application. Given the patent number and filing date (2017), the patent was likely granted after examination by the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), which follows rigorous criteria under Brazil’s intellectual property law (Law No. 9,279/1996).

While the exact title and inventor details are not specified here, typical pharmaceutical patents focus on novel active ingredients, methods of manufacturing, or specific delivery systems. These inventions aim to improve efficacy, stability, or patient compliance over existing therapies.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Nature of Claims

The patent claims are the legal boundary defining the scope of protection. They are typically categorized into independent claims—broadly covering the core invention—and dependent claims—adding specific limitations or embodiments.

For BR112017008097, the claims likely encompass:

  • Composition Claims: Covering specific formulations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, and their ratios.
  • Method Claims: Outlining novel methods of manufacturing or administering the pharmaceutical composition.
  • Use Claims: Covering particular therapeutic applications or indications.

Given patent practices, the broadest independent claims probably seek to secure a wide scope, preventing third-party imitation of similar formulations or methods, while dependent claims narrow the scope to particular embodiments.

2. Claims Scope and Patentability

  • Novelty: The invention must demonstrate novelty compared to prior art—existing medications, compositions, or methods available in Brazil or published internationally before the priority date (2017).
  • Inventive Step: It must involve an inventive contribution beyond prior arts, such as improved stability or efficacy.
  • Industrial Applicability: The claimed invention should have practical utility, i.e., be capable of industrial production and use.

The scope’s novelty and inventive step heavily influence enforceability and licensing leverage. Broad claims provide extensive rights but face heightened scrutiny during examination, especially if similar prior art exists.

3. Strategic Considerations

  • Claim Drafting: Well-drafted claims balance broad coverage with specificity to withstand challenges.
  • Focus on Innovation: Claims encompassing novel combinations, unique delivery mechanisms, or unexpected therapeutic effects will command higher value.
  • Likelihood of Opposition: In Brazil, third parties can challenge the patent during opposition periods; narrower claims may facilitate defense.

Patent Landscape in Brazil

1. Patent Trends in Pharmaceuticals

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Increased patent filings aligned with global trends, especially for biologics and innovative formulations.
  • Stringent examination standards emphasizing novelty and inventive step.
  • Growing awareness and enforcement of patent rights, albeit with notable flexibilities under Brazil’s Patent Law, particularly for public health considerations.

2. Related Patent Families

  • Similar patents published in other jurisdictions, such as the US, Europe, or China, reveal the innovation’s international relevance.
  • Patent families with foreign equivalents suggest a strategic intent for global market protection. Companies may seek to build a defensive IP portfolio around the core invention.

3. Prior Art and Technical Landscape

  • A review of existing patents and publications pre-2017 indicates the state of the art, impacting the scope of BR112017008097.
  • The presence of prior similar inventions could limit the breadth of claims, emphasizing the importance of claim specificity in Brazil.

4. Patent Challenges and Opportunities

  • Compulsory Licenses and Flexibilities: Brazil’s legal framework permits compulsory licensing under public health emergencies, potentially impacting patent enforceability.
  • Patent Term and Data Exclusivity: A 20-year patent term, with possible extensions, provides a strategic advantage for market exclusivity.

Legal and Practical Implications

  • The patent’s scope impacts market exclusivity for the covered pharmaceutical formulation or method.
  • Broad claims could deter generics, but overly broad claims risk invalidation if challenged successfully.
  • Narrow claims might encourage generic competition but potentially limit licensing opportunities.

The patent landscape suggests a competitive environment where strategic claim drafting and enforcement are vital. Companies must continuously monitor competitors’ patents and patent applications to identify potential infringement risks or opportunities for licensing.


Conclusion

Brazilian Patent BR112017008097 defines a potentially broad and commercially significant scope within the pharmaceutical field. Its claims likely protect specific formulations, methods, or uses, contingent on rigorous novelty and inventive step criteria. The patent landscape underscores the importance of carefully navigating prior art and patent strategies, especially considering Brazil’s flexible approach to patent rights in public health contexts.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Defined by Strategic Claims: Effective patent claims balance broad coverage with enforceability, requiring detailed understanding of prior art.
  • Patent Landscape is Dynamic: Continued innovations and filings in Brazil demand vigilant landscape monitoring to maintain competitive advantage.
  • Legal Flexibilities Impact Enforcement: Brazil’s provisions for compulsory licensing and patent exceptions call for strategic patent positioning.
  • International Alignment: Patent families associated with BR112017008097 enhance global protection but necessitate comprehensive regional IP strategies.
  • Legal Vigilance Essential: Regular patent landscape analyses prevent infringement risks and identify licensing or partnership opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What are the key elements to analyze in the claims of Brazilian pharmaceutical patents?
Claims should be reviewed concerning their scope (broad or narrow), novelty, inventive step, and clarity. Independent claims establish the broadest rights, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments. Understanding these helps assess enforceability and strategic value.

2. How does Brazil’s patent law affect pharmaceutical patent enforceability?
Brazil’s law emphasizes novelty and inventive step, with certain flexibilities for public health considerations, including compulsory licenses in emergencies. Patent enforcement must navigate these legal nuances to safeguard rights.

3. Can generic manufacturers challenge the validity of BR112017008097?
Yes. Third parties can file oppositions during patent prosecution or initiate legal nullity actions post-grant, especially if prior art or procedural issues compromise validity.

4. How does the patent landscape influence strategic patent filing in Brazil?
A comprehensive understanding of prior art, filing trends, and patent erosion risks informs strategic filing, claim drafting, and licensing decisions to maximize protection and market position.

5. Are international patent filings relevant to the Brazilian patent?
Yes. Patent families filed internationally provide broader protection and strategic leverage, especially where the invention has global commercial potential. Coordinated filings optimize protection against patent eviction and infringement.


Sources:

  1. INPI Brazil Patent Database, Official Gazette.
  2. Brazil Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Global Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. D.C. Thomas, "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies in Brazil," Intellectual Property Journal, 2021.
  5. World Trade Organization, TRIPS Agreement.

Note: The analysis is based on publicly available information and standard patent practices; specific claims and legal challenges may vary based on actual patent documentation and proceedings.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.