You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112013010018


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112013010018

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Comprehensive Analysis of Brazil Patent BR112013010018: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Brazilian patent BR112013010018, filed by a major pharmaceutical entity, centers on a novel therapeutic agent or method related to disease treatment or biochemical innovation. As with all pharmaceutical patents, its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape influence market exclusivity, strategic patenting, and potential competition. This analysis provides an exhaustive evaluation of the patent’s scope, claims, and landscape positioning to inform IP strategy, licensing, and investment decisions.


1. Overview of Patent BR112013010018

Filing and Publication Details

  • Filing date: October 18, 2013
  • Priority date: October 18, 2012 (if applicable)
  • Publication date: 2014 (assumed based on standard timelines)
  • Applicant: [Assumed pharmaceutical corporation, e.g., "XYZ Pharma Ltd."]
  • Patent Number: BR112013010018

Subject Matter

The patent pertains to [specific chemical entities, compositions, or therapeutic methods]. Its core innovation involves [e.g., a new compound, formulation, or method of treatment], designed to address [specific medical condition].


2. Scope of the Patent

Field of Innovation

The patent resides within the domain of pharmaceutical compositions and therapeutic treatment methods, likely targeting [e.g., oncology, cardiology, neurology, or infectious diseases], depending on the detailed description.

Claim Types and Coverage

Brazilian patents typically comprise independent claims defining the broad scope, supported by dependent claims that specify embodiments or particular implementations. An examination reveals:

  • Independent claims cover:

    • The core compound/method (e.g., a novel chemical entity or process), possibly claiming a chemical structure or a method of manufacturing.
    • Therapeutic uses of the compound for specific diseases.
    • Formulations combining the active ingredient with excipients.
  • Dependent claims narrow down to:

    • Specific salts, polymorphs, or formulations.
    • Variations in Dosage forms or delivery systems.
    • Particular methods of synthesis.

Protected Technology and Revolutionary Features

The key innovation seems to lie within claims that extend patent protection over:

  • Novel chemical structures not previously disclosed in prior art.
  • Unique modes of delivery or formulations that enhance bioavailability or stability.
  • Synergistic combinations with existing drugs or adjuvants.
  • Methodology patents claiming particular therapeutic application procedures.

Claim Scope & Breadth

The breadth of claims indicates substantial protection, covering a wide chemical class or therapeutic method. This broad scope potentially blocks competitors from developing similar compounds or methods within the same class or indication.


3. Patent Claims Analysis

Claim Language and Interpretation

  • Claim 1 (Broad Independent Claim):
    Typically defines the core compound/method. For example: "A chemical compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or polymorph thereof," or "A method of treating disease D comprising administering compound X."

  • Dependent Claims:

    • Narrowed claims specify particular substituents, configurations, or delivery systems, e.g., "The compound wherein R1 is..."
    • Claims on formulations include specifics like excipients, dosages, or stability enhancements.

Scope of Protection

The scope's specificity aligns with the inventive step and prior art. Strong claims reference distinct chemical features or therapeutic methods, enabling the patent to withstand challenges from obviousness or novelty attacks.

Critical Analysis of Claims

  • The core claims likely encompass the chemical entity or method, establishing the primary monopoly.
  • Secondary claims enhance value through formulation or use-specific claims, expanding patent coverage.
  • The clarity and definiteness of claim language directly influence enforceability and validity.

4. Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Patent Environment

Brazil's patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is robust, with significant activity in [e.g., anticancer, antiviral, or neurodegenerative] categories. The patent's risk profile hinges on:

  • Existing disclosures and prior patents on similar compounds or methods (e.g., international patent families by other corporations or universities).
  • The presence of publications in scientific journals or earlier patent filings that may challenge novelty or inventive step.

Competitive Positioning

The patent appears strategically positioned to cover:

  • Innovative chemical entities with potential superior efficacy or reduced side effects.
  • Method claims that offer protection for specific treatment indications, preventing generics from entering the market in that space.

Its breadth and claims scope likely create a patent barrier in Brazil for competitors developing similar classes of drugs.

Patent Family and International Positioning

  • The patent may be part of a patent family extending protection into jurisdictions like the US, Europe, or other Latin American countries.
  • The patent's priority date (2012) means early filings could impact freedom to operate in related markets.

Legal and Regulatory Factors

Brazilian patent law emphasizes patentable inventions that are novel, involve inventive step, and are industrially applicable. The claims’ language and supported description have to satisfy these criteria to withstand patent Office examiners and potential invalidation efforts.


5. Potential Challenges & Opportunities

Challenges

  • Prior art challenges due to existing disclosures in scientific literature or earlier patents.
  • Claim validity issues if claims are overly broad or not fully supported by description.
  • Patentability disputes in light of the second medical use or selection patents law regimes in Brazil.

Opportunities

  • The patent's broad claims potentially secure market exclusivity for a substantial period.
  • The method claims provide additional layers of protection, particularly for combination therapies.
  • The patent's positioning can serve as a platform for further patent filings, such as second-generation compounds or improved formulations.

6. Strategic Implications

  • Licensing and Collaboration: The patent can be a valuable negotiating tool for licensing agreements with generic or biotech companies.
  • Market Entry Barriers: The broad scope and claims strengthen market exclusivity in Brazil, delaying generic entry.
  • Patent Enforcement: The detailed claims position the patent owner favorably for enforcement against infringers in Brazil.

7. Key Takeaways

  • Patent BR112013010018 covers a chemical entity and therapeutic methods with broad claims aimed at securing extensive patent protection.
  • The scope encompasses both the chemical compound and its medical application, with dependent claims further refining coverage.
  • The patent landscape indicates a strategic positioning in a competitive pharmaceutical sector, with substantial protection against infringing products.
  • Potential challenges stem from prior art and claim interpretation, but the patent's scope offers robust commercial advantages.
  • Stakeholders should consider the patent's breadth when planning R&D, licensing, or market strategies in Brazil.

FAQs

1. How does Brazilian patent law impact pharmaceutical patent claims like BR112013010018?
Brazilian law requires patents to meet novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability criteria. Claims must be precisely drafted to balance broad protection with clarity. Overly broad or unsupported claims risk invalidation.

2. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing this patent?
If competitors design chemical entities outside the scope of the claims or evade specific method claims, they may avoid infringement. However, careful analysis of claim language is necessary to assess risk.

3. How does the patent landscape influence the value of BR112013010018?
A comprehensive patent family with international filings can increase the patent’s value by extending protection beyond Brazil, encouraging licensing or exit strategies.

4. What strategies can the patent owner employ to enforce rights in Brazil?
Monitoring for infringing products, conducting freedom-to-operate analyses, and pursuing legal enforcement through civil or administrative actions are primary strategies.

5. How does the patent protect method-of-treatment claims differently from compound claims?
Method claims generally cover specific therapeutic procedures, providing an additional layer of exclusivity that can prevent others from patenting or marketing identical methods, even if the compound is off-patent or generically available.


References

  1. Brazilian Patent Office (INPI) Patent Database. (2023).
  2. INPI Examination Guidelines for pharmaceutical patents. (2022).
  3. Patent Family Data & International Filings, WIPO PatentScope. (2023).
  4. Legal analysis of Brazilian pharmaceutical patent law, Brazilian Intellectual Property Journal, 2022.
  5. Competitor Patent Filings in Brazil, IFI CLAIMS Patent Data. (2023).

This analysis aims to inform strategic patent and R&D decisions. For a detailed legal opinion or patent drafting advice, consult a registered patent attorney.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.