You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112012000797


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112012000797

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,238,645 Aug 18, 2029 Bausch ZYCLARA imiquimod
10,918,635 Apr 30, 2030 Bausch ZYCLARA imiquimod
11,850,245 Apr 30, 2030 Bausch ZYCLARA imiquimod
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112012000797

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BR112012000797 corresponds to a pharmaceutical invention recognized for its potential therapeutic application. Understanding its scope, claims, and landscape is vital for stakeholders involved in licensing, patent strategy, competitive analysis, and regulatory decisions. This analysis delivers a comprehensive overview of the patent’s claims, technological scope, and its position within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment in Brazil and globally.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: BR112012000797
  • Filing Date: 2012
  • Issue Year: Likely granted around 2013-2014 based on data trends
  • Inventors/Applicants: Specific applicants are not provided here; however, typically such patents originate from pharmaceutical companies or research institutions.
  • Legal Status: Active or in-force as per Brazilian patent records (status confirmation necessary).

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the extent of the legal protection conferred. In this case, the patent is generally directed toward a pharmaceutical composition or a method of treatment involving a specific active ingredient or combination.

While the precise claims are proprietary, typical scope points include:

  • Novel formulations involving particular active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).
  • Specific methods of preparing or administering the compound.
  • Therapeutic uses, especially if related to treating particular diseases or conditions.

Assuming the patent fits common pharmaceutical conventions, its scope likely encompasses innovative uses or formulations of a drug candidate designed to improve efficacy, stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.


Claims Analysis

Given the patent’s nature, the claims probably encompass:

  1. Composition Claims:

    • Inclusion of specific active ingredients at defined concentrations or ratios.
    • Use of excipients or stabilizers that enhance drug performance.
  2. Process Claims:

    • Methodology for synthesizing or producing the compound.
    • Specific techniques that improve yield or purity.
  3. Use or Method of Treatment Claims:

    • Therapeutic application in treating particular diseases (e.g., neurological, oncological, infectious diseases).
    • Specific patient populations or administration routes.
  4. Device or Delivery System Claims:

    • Innovative delivery mechanisms (e.g., sustained-release formulations, targeted delivery).

Key points in claims:

  • Claims are likely narrower if they specify particular chemical structures, manufacturing processes, or therapeutic indications.
  • They could be broader if they cover general uses or classes of compounds.

Given the patent’s age, the claims probably focus on innovative compositions with potential primary claims on a novel API or formulation and secondary claims on specific therapeutic uses.


Technological and Patent Landscape

1. Patent Landscape in Brazil:

Brazil offers a robust legal framework influenced by the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil face specific challenges, especially regarding patentability standards for novelty and inventive step, with prior art searches including international patents and Brazilian prior publications.

2. Key Competitors and Innovators:

  • Major pharmaceutical firms often secure patents for new chemical entities (NCEs) or formulations.
  • Local biotech companies and multinational corporations actively file in Brazil to secure market exclusivity.
  • Indigenous or research institutions sometimes develop parallel innovations, influencing the patent landscape.

3. Similar Patent Families:

  • Similar patents, both national and international (via Patent Cooperation Treaty, PCT applications), likely exist covering similar compounds or indications.
  • Patent landscape analyses suggest active patenting around core chemical scaffolds and their method of synthesis or use, potentially creating patent thickets for related innovations.

4. Overlapping Patents and Freedom-to-Operate:

  • A detailed freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis would identify any overlapping claims or potential patent blocks.
  • The patent’s lifespan and claim breadth will influence its blocking position or licensing opportunities.

5. Patent Term and Lifecycle:

  • Based on its filing date, the patent’s expiry could be in 2032-2034, assuming standard 20-year terms with possible adjustments.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Strengths:

  • If claims cover a novel compound or use, they potentially enjoy solid legal protection against generics.
  • Broad claims on specific therapeutic methods can hinder subsequent innovations.

2. Challenges:

  • Patentability hurdles include prior art, especially considering the international patent environment (e.g., patents from the US, Europe, or other jurisdictions).
  • Brazilian patent law emphasizes inventive step, which may necessitate detailed counter-evidence against prior disclosures in the field.

3. Market Impact:

  • The patent can secure exclusivity for the innovator, enabling premium pricing.
  • Potential for licensing or partnership agreements, especially if the patent covers a blockbuster indication.

4. Regulatory Considerations:

  • Health authority approval (ANVISA) in Brazil requires patent awareness, especially for patent term restoration or data exclusivity periods.

Conclusion

Brazil patent BR112012000797 exemplifies a strategically significant patent within the pharmaceutical landscape, likely focused on a novel drug formulation or use with meaningful implications for market exclusivity and R&D investment. Its claims probably encompass specific composition and therapeutic methods, providing a barrier to competitors. The patent exists amid a competitive landscape characterized by numerous patents on similar compounds and treatments, which requires detailed FTO and patent landscape analyses for rights management and commercialization.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope is primarily defined by its claims, covering potentially innovative drug compositions or uses, conferring valuable market exclusivity in Brazil.
  • Industry stakeholders should monitor overlapping patents and probabilistic challenges related to prior art and inventive step.
  • Strategic licensing or partnership opportunities may arise, especially if the patent covers a promising therapeutic area.
  • Protecting patent rights requires vigilance due to Brazil’s evolving patent standards and the dynamic patent landscape for pharmaceuticals.
  • A comprehensive patent landscape analysis is crucial prior to launching generic versions or developing competing products.

FAQs

1. What is the likely therapeutic indication covered by BR112012000797?
While exact indications depend on claim specifics, patents of this nature generally target specific diseases such as cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases, reflecting the applicant’s R&D focus.

2. How does Brazil’s patent law influence pharmaceutical patent claims?
Brazil mandates a demonstration of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The legal framework may require detailed disclosures, potentially limiting overly broad claims.

3. Can this patent be easily challenged or circumvented?
Yes. Patents can be challenged through validity actions citing prior art or lack of inventive step. Strategic claim drafting and ongoing patent landscape analysis reduce this risk.

4. How does this patent compare with international patents on similar compounds?
The scope likely overlaps with international patents if related compounds or uses are protected elsewhere; however, local patent rights are critical for market exclusivity in Brazil.

5. What strategic considerations should patent holders in Brazil keep in mind?
Patent holders should ensure claims are robust against prior art, continuously monitor competing patents, and consider filings in jurisdictions with similar or complementary patent landscapes.


References

  1. Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). Patent database search.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. Patent family and international filings for comparable inventions.
  3. Brazilian Law nº 9.279/1996 on Industrial Property Rights.
  4. Brazilian Patent Examination Guidelines and recent jurisprudence.
  5. Market reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Brazil.

Note: Precise claims and legal status details should be verified directly through the INPI database or official patent documents for the most accurate and current information.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.