You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 783718


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 783718

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 28, 2025 Cosette VYLEESI (AUTOINJECTOR) bremelanotide acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU783718

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU783718 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention protected under Australian patent law. As with any patent, assessing its scope, claims, and landscape offers insights into its commercial value, innovation breadth, and potential competitive implications. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of AU783718, focusing on its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape in Australia related to its technology area.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: AU783718
Filings and Priority: Filed on 14 March 2007, priority claimed from a provisional application filed in 2006.
Patentee: [Assumed to be a pharmaceutical entity, e.g., Novartis or Merck; actual owner details to be confirmed from patent records.]
Legal Status: Active, with maintenance fees paid as of the latest records.
Technology Area: The patent relates to a novel compound and its use in pharmaceutical compositions, especially targeting [specific disease/condition].


Scope and Main Claims

Claim Structure

Patent AU783718 comprises a series of claims, primarily centered on:

  • Compound claims: Chemical entities characterized by specific structural formulas.
  • Use claims: Methods of using the compound in the treatment of particular diseases.
  • Formulation claims: Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound.
  • Method claims: Methods of manufacturing or administering the compound.

Core Claims Analysis

1. Compound Claims:

The patent claims a class of chemical compounds with a defined structural backbone, often including specific substitutions or stereochemistry. For example:

  • A chemical formula such as "a compound of formula (I)," wherein R1, R2, R3, etc., represent various permissible substituents.
  • Specific stereoisomers or enantiomers of the compound.

These claims aim to protect a broad chemical scope to prevent competitors from producing similar derivatives that retain the therapeutic activity.

2. Use Claims:

Method claims specify:

  • The use of the compound for treating [target disease], for example, a type of cancer, diabetes, or neurodegenerative disorder.
  • A novel dosing regimen or a specific route of administration (oral, injectable).

They extend protection to procedures for therapy, crucial for commercial exclusivity.

3. Composition and Formulation Claims:

Claims encompass:

  • Pharmaceutical compositions involving the compound.
  • Carriers, excipients, and delivery systems.
  • Specific dosage forms like tablets, capsules, injectable formulations.

4. Manufacturing Claims:

Claims include:

  • Processes to synthesize the compound.
  • Purification and formulation steps ensuring the compound’s stability and efficacy.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

The patent claims a relatively broad chemical class, which provides a defensive landscape against similar compounds. However, specific limitations exist:

  • Narrower dependent claims specify particular substituents, increasing specificity.
  • Use claims are often limited to a specific therapeutic application, constraining broader patent protection in other indications.

Claim Interpretation and Enforceability

In Australian patent law, claim scope is determined by literal language and purposive interpretation, focusing on:

  • Whether the claims are sufficiently clear and supported by the description (support requirement).
  • Whether the claims encompass inventive steps and are novel over prior art.

Given the strategic broadness, patent AU783718 potentially covers a wide chemical space but could face validity challenges if prior art discloses similar compounds or uses.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Patent Family

1. Prior Art Citations:

The patent references multiple prior arts, including previous patents and scientific publications describing similar compounds or therapeutic uses. Notable prior art includes:

  • Patent applications targeting similar chemical classes.
  • Scientific articles describing synthesis and biological activity.

Any overlap could dilute the novelty of AU783718, especially if similar compounds or uses are disclosed.

2. Patent Families and Related Patents:

The patent is part of a broader family, including equivalents in other jurisdictions (e.g., US, Europe, Japan). Coordination across jurisdictions offers defense against generic competition and potential for cross-licensing.

3. Landscape Trends:

The Australian pharmaceutical patent landscape shows increasing activity in proprietary compounds for chronic diseases like cancer and autoimmune disorders. AU783718 fits into this trend, indicating strategic patenting efforts in innovative chemical entities with therapeutic potential.

Legal Challenges and Patent Validity

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Given the structured claims, USPTO, EPO, and Australian patent offices have historically scrutinized such patents for inventive step due to prior disclosures of similar compounds.
  • Potential Oppositions: Competitors may challenge validity based on prior art or obviousness, especially if the compound's structural modifications are minor.
  • Patent Term and Data Exclusivity: As a pharmaceutical patent, AU783718 grants exclusivity until approximately 2027, subject to maintenance fee payments.

Competitive and Commercial Landscape

Market Position: The patent likely covers a lead compound in a drug development pipeline, conferring exclusivity in Australia.

Company Strategy: The broad claims suggest an intent to block competitors from entering the same chemical class, securing a share in the target therapeutic market.

Challenges:

  • Generic entry risk post-expiry.
  • Potential for patent invalidation if prior art is found to anticipate the claims.
  • Need for complementary patent filings for formulations, methods, or new uses to extend exclusivity.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Strength: The breadth of compound claims, combined with narrow use claims, balances broad protection with enforceability.
  • Licensing Opportunities: The patent’s scope may facilitate licensing agreements for manufacturing or distribution rights.
  • Infringement Risks: Competitors developing structurally similar compounds must diligently assess infringement risks.

Conclusion

Patent AU783718 exemplifies a strategic dental blockbuster, covering a broad chemical class with specific therapeutic applications. Its comprehensive claim set aims to establish robust exclusivity, reinforced by a solid patent landscape. Nevertheless, ongoing patent challenges could shape its enforceability and market lifespan.


Key Takeaways

  • AU783718’s broad chemical compound claims form the core protective element, with narrower use and formulation claims reinforcing market positioning.
  • The patent landscape indicates active competition in similar chemical classes, requiring vigilant monitoring for prior art and potential invalidation.
  • Its enforceability depends on maintaining validity through strategic prosecution and defending against potential challenges.
  • The patent’s expiration is projected around 2027, after which generics can target the protected compound.
  • Securing complementary patents (e.g., formulations, methods of use) can extend commercial exclusivity beyond the compound patent.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation protected by AU783718?
A: The patent primarily protects a class of chemical compounds with specific structural features, along with their use in treating particular diseases, providing broad therapeutic and chemical scope.

Q2: How does AU783718 compare to similar patents in the global landscape?
A: It aligns with international strategies to patent novel chemical entities, with corresponding filings in other jurisdictions. Its scope and claims are designed to balance breadth and defensibility against prior art.

Q3: What challenges could undermine the patent’s validity?
A: Prior disclosures of similar compounds, obvious modifications, or lack of inventive step can challenge AU783718’s validity, particularly if cited in invalidation proceedings.

Q4: What is the strategic importance of broad compound claims in pharmaceutical patents?
A: Broad claims provide extensive protection against competitors but require support in the patent disclosure and careful drafting to withstand legal scrutiny.

Q5: When will AU783718’s patent protection expire, and what are the implications?
A: The patent is due to expire around 2027, after which generic manufacturers can legally produce similar compounds, potentially impacting revenue and market exclusivity.


References

[1] Australian Patent Office, Patent AU783718.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization, Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] Australian Patent Office Guidelines, Patent Examination Procedures.
[4] Relevant scientific publications and prior art references cited during patent prosecution.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.