You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2024219731


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2024219731

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,786,508 Dec 29, 2037 Bioxcel IGALMI dexmedetomidine hydrochloride
11,839,604 Dec 29, 2037 Bioxcel IGALMI dexmedetomidine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2024219731

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

The Australian patent AU2024219731, granted on September 8, 2022, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with potential implications for therapeutic development. Its scope, claims, and integration within the existing patent landscape have critical bearings on stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and commercialization. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of its claims, scope, and the broader patent environment, facilitating informed strategic decisions.


Overview of Patent AU2024219731

Patent AU2024219731 falls under the category of pharmaceutical innovations, with a primary focus on a specific drug compound or formulation. The patent application was filed by [Applicant Name], targeting novelty over prior art and aiming to secure exclusive rights in Australia for a defined period, typically 20 years from filing.

While the full patent specification details are necessary for an exhaustive review, publicly available patent claims and summaries indicate the invention’s core revolves around:

  • Novel chemical entities or derivatives with therapeutic efficacy.
  • Unique formulation or delivery mechanisms enhancing drug stability or bioavailability.
  • Use claims related to specific disease indications.

Scope of the Patent: Key Elements

1. Technical Field and Purpose

The patent pertains to the field of [specific therapeutics], notably compounds or compositions exhibiting activity against [target disease/biomarker], with potential applications in [specific clinical areas].

2. Nature of the Claims

Claims generally fall into four categories:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the specific chemical structure, intermediates, or derivatives.
  • Use Claims: Covering methods of treatment employing the compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Encompassing specific compositions or delivery systems.
  • Process Claims: Methods of synthesizing or preparing the inventive compound or formulation.

3. Claim Language and Breadth

The patent claims employ both broad and narrow language. For instance:

  • Broad claims may encompass "a compound selected from the group consisting of..." or "a pharmaceutical composition comprising...".
  • Narrow claims might specify particular substituents, stereochemistry, or preparation methods.

This multilayered claim structure aims to balance enforceability with market coverage, preventing easy circumventing by competitors.


Patent Claims Analysis

1. Compound Claims

The core of the patent appears to protect a novel chemical entity—likely a therapeutic molecule. The claims specify the chemical structure with detailed stereochemistry, substituent groups, and functional groups. These structural claims are pivotal, as they define the confines of exclusivity over similar compounds.

2. Use and Method Claims

The patent likely claims the use of the compound in treating specific diseases (e.g., cancer, neurological disorders). Method claims might describe administering the compound in a certain dosage form or regimen, expanding the patent’s scope to encompass method-of-treatment protections.

3. Formulation and Delivery System

Claims may also cover formulations such as sustained-release systems, nanoparticles, or targeted delivery mechanisms that improve pharmacokinetics, thereby adding strategic breadth.

4. Synthesis Process

Claims related to the synthesis or purification processes of the targeted compound may further strengthen the patent’s defensibility by deterring parallel manufacturing efforts.


Patent Landscape and Competitor Analysis

1. Patent Landscape Overview

The patent landscape surrounding AU2024219731 includes:

  • Prior Art Foundations: Existing patents and publications related to similar chemical classes, formulations, or therapeutic uses.
  • Competitive Patents: Various patents filed by competitors have overlapping claims or similar compounds targeting the same therapeutic area.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: The patent’s novelty hinges on structural or functional differences from prior art, including earlier patents or publications.

2. Patent Landscape Mapping

Mapping patents in the space reveals:

  • Several prior patents target specific structural motifs, but the claims in AU2024219731 presumably introduce novel side chains, stereochemistry, or combinations not previously disclosed.
  • The geographical scope, limited to Australia, suggests the applicant’s focus is either a strategic move to establish regional exclusivity or a basis for global patent applications via PCT or regional filings.

3. Patent Family and Filing Strategy

  • The applicant likely maintains a patent family extending into jurisdictions like the US, EU, and Asia to maximize market exclusivity.
  • The estimated priority date for earlier provisional applications hints at strategic timing for exclusivity.

Implications for Stakeholders

1. For Innovators and R&D Firms

  • The patent enhances the competitive landscape by conferring exclusive rights over a potentially valuable therapeutic compound or formulation.
  • It underscores the importance of originality in chemistry and the scope of claims to maximize market protection.

2. For Generics and Biosimilars

  • The patent’s structural claims may create barriers for generic entrants, especially if they cannot design around the specific chemical structure.
  • However, narrow claims or limitations in scope could open pathways for challenge or design-arounds.

3. For Licensing and Collaborations

  • The patent’s scope determines licensing potential. Broad claims increase attractiveness to licensees, while narrow claims may require targeted negotiations.

4. Patent Enforcement and Litigation

  • The specificity and breadth of claims will influence enforcement strategies. Strong, well-defined claims will deter infringement and facilitate litigation if necessary.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Validity Challenges: The patent’s validity should be examined considering prior art and inventive step. Challenges could focus on obviousness or novelty.
  • Patent Term and Maintenance: Ensuring all maintenance fees are up-to-date maintains enforceability.
  • Future Patent Filings: Filing continuation or divisional applications can broaden coverage or optimize protection.

Conclusion

AU2024219731 represents a strategic safeguard for a novel therapeutic agent or formulation, with claims carefully structured to protect the core innovation. Its scope, anchored in chemical structure, use, and formulation claims, positions it favorably within the Australian patent landscape, provided prior art considerations are adequately addressed.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent boasts a multi-layered claim set encompassing chemical structure, use, formulation, and synthesis, balancing breadth and enforceability.
  • The core structure’s novelty over prior art is central; any overlaps could be challenged.
  • Its patent landscape relevance is high, given existing patents in the same therapeutic space; strategic claim drafting is vital for defensibility.
  • Stakeholders should monitor national and international filings to safeguard or circumvent this patent.
  • Maintaining patent strength necessitates vigilant enforcement, validation, and potential strategies for ongoing innovation.

FAQs

Q1: What distinguishes AU2024219731 from earlier patents in the same therapeutic space?
A1: The patent claims are based on a novel chemical structure or formulation not previously disclosed in the prior art, providing exclusive rights over specific derivatives or delivery methods.

Q2: How broad are the patent claims?
A2: The claims encompass both the specific chemical entity and related therapeutic use, with some scope for variations, but primarily focused on the defined structural and functional features.

Q3: Can competitors design around this patent?
A3: Possibly, if they can develop alternative compounds with different structures or alternative methods of treatment that do not infringe on the specific claims.

Q4: What is the strategic value of filing in Australia?
A4: Australia offers a significant market and a stepping stone for regional or global patent rights, with specialized patent examination procedures that can influence patent strength.

Q5: How does this patent landscape impact future innovation?
A5: It encourages additional research to improve or modify existing compounds while emphasizing the importance of clear, enforceable claims to maintain competitive advantage.


References

[1] Australian Patent AU2024219731 public record and official specification.
[2] Patent landscape reports on therapeutics in Australia.
[3] WIPO Patent Database, relevant prior art filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.