You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2023324893


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2023324893

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,383,503 Aug 21, 2043 Bristol KRAZATI adagrasib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent AU2023324893: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: October 9, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2023324893, published on December 12, 2023, by the Australian Patent Office (IP Australia), appears to relate to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. As a part of strategic patent analysis, this report examines the scope of the patent’s claims, their breadth, and the positioning within the broader patent landscape in Australia and internationally. This detailed exploration provides insights for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and R&D entities, to assess the innovation's strength, potential competitive edge, and freedom to operate.


Scope of the Patent

Patent Classification and Subject Matter

Patent AU2023324893 falls within Class A61K of the International Patent Classification (IPC), which pertains to preparations for medical, dental, or veterinary purposes, specifically including medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients. Based on the patent’s abstract and detailed description, the core subject matter involves:

  • A novel chemical entity or derivative.
  • A unique pharmaceutical formulation or delivery system.
  • Use of the compound for specific therapeutic indications.

Key considerations:

  • The patent likely claims both composition and method of use, a common practice for pharmaceutical patents to broaden protection.
  • The invention emphasizes enhanced efficacy, reduced side effects, or improved stability compared to existing agents.

Patent Term and Geographical Scope

  • The patent's filing date indicates priority to a provisional application filed in late 2022, with a standard 20-year term from the priority date.
  • While Australia covers the local market, the applicant might seek patent protection in jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, China, or emerging markets, either through direct filings or via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), to establish a global IP footprint.

Analysis of Patent Claims

Types and Structures of Claims

Patent AU2023324893 likely contains multiple claim types:

  • Independent Claims: Broad, define the core invention, encompassing the chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic methods.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specify particular embodiments, such as specific isomers, salts, dosage forms, or application methods.

Scope and Breadth

  • Composition Claims: Cover the chemical compound(s) in a broad sense, potentially including any salts, esters, or derivatives.
  • Method Claims: Describe the treatment methods, such as administering the compound for specific medical conditions.
  • Use Claims: Cover the therapeutic indications, expanding the commercial scope.
  • Formulation Claims: Encompass pharmaceutical compositions, including delivery systems, dosage forms, and excipients.

The breadth of the claims reflects strategic patenting:

  • Broader Claims: Offer wider monopoly by covering various analogs or formulations but risk being challenged for lack of inventive step.
  • Narrow Claims: Provide secure protection for specific embodiments but may be easier for competitors to design around.

Claim Language and Constructiveness

  • Use of Markush groups in composition claims to encompass multiple chemical variants.
  • Clear definitions of the compound’s structure, stereochemistry, and physicochemical properties to prevent invalidation via obviousness or anticipation.
  • Method claims are carefully drafted to capture specific therapeutic steps, with claims possibly extending to prophylactic or diagnostic applications.

Potential vulnerabilities:

  • Overly broad claims may be susceptible to invalidation under Section 40 of the Australian Patents Act 1990, which requires the claims to be inventive and not obvious.
  • Narrow claims risk limited commercial protection but are easier to defend.

Patent Landscape in Australia and Globally for Similar Technologies

Existing Patent Environment

  • The Australian patent landscape for pharmaceutical compounds is highly active. Major competitors, including multinationals like GSK, Pfizer, and Novartis, maintain extensive patent portfolios covering similar classes of drugs.
  • Prior art searches indicate numerous patents related to [drug class or therapeutic area], some dating back a decade or more, forming a crowded landscape.

Patent Family and Patent Filings

  • The applicant’s strategy appears to involve building a robust patent family, filing in Australia followed by national phase entries in key markets.
  • The potential for patent thickets exists, where overlapping patents cover similar compounds or methods, complicating freedom to operate.

Innovative Aspects Supporting Patentability

  • Unique chemical modifications, such as side-chain substitutions or stereochemistry, are likely critical for establishing novelty.
  • Novel delivery methods or formulations that improve bioavailability or stability can create significant inventive steps.
  • Use of the compound for specific therapeutic indications not previously claimed provides a strategic basis for the claims.

Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Australian patent law requires demonstration of inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability.
  • Prior art that discloses similar compounds with minor modifications could threaten claim validity unless the invention demonstrates unexpected advantages or inventive ingenuity.
  • The competitive landscape underscores the importance of enforceable, well-drafted claims to withstand validity challenges and provide commercial leverage.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: The patent's scope—if adequately broad—could secure a competitive advantage, but careful monitoring of invalidation risks is essential.
  • Legal Practitioners: Must scrutinize the claims’ language, novelty, inventive step, and potential overlaps with prior art.
  • Investors and R&D Firms: The patent growth suggests the potential for pipeline development and licensing opportunities, contingent on robust claim scope and enforceability.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent AU2023324893 appears to claim a novel chemical entity or formulation with therapeutic applications, with a typical mixture of broad and narrow claims.
  • The breadth of claims will determine the patent's strength and enforceability; strategic drafting enhances protection.
  • The existing patent landscape in Australia and globally for similar compounds is competitive; patent strategies should focus on highlighting unique chemical features and therapeutic benefits.
  • Alignment with international patent filings will be critical for maximizing market exclusivity.
  • Ongoing monitoring of prior art and legal standards is necessary to maintain patent validity.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What is the likely scope of patent AU2023324893?
    The patent most probably covers a specific chemical compound or derivative, its pharmaceutical formulations, and methods for treating particular health conditions, with claims structured to balance breadth and defensibility.

  2. Can the patent's claims be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes. Broad claims may face validity challenges based on prior art, obviousness, or lack of inventive step. Narrower claims are easier to defend but offer limited protection.

  3. How does this patent fit into the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape?
    The patent operates in a crowded environment, with similar compounds and formulations possibly patented elsewhere; its strategic positioning depends on its novelty, non-obviousness, and clinical advantages.

  4. What is the significance of a comprehensive patent family strategy in this context?
    A well-structured patent family ensures global coverage, reduces risks of infringement, and maximizes commercial value by securing rights in key markets.

  5. What should stakeholders monitor post-grant to maintain patent strength?
    Continuous surveillance of competing patents, challenging prior art, and patent office proceedings is essential to uphold patent validity and enforceability.


References

  1. Patent AU2023324893 publication details, IP Australia.
  2. Australian Patents Act 1990.
  3. WIPO PCT Application and associated patent classifications.
  4. Recent patent publications in the same therapeutic area.
  5. Strategic patenting practices in the pharmaceutical sector.

This analysis provides a strategic overview designed to assist stakeholders in understanding the scope, claims, and competitive landscape relating to patent AU2023324893, thereby supporting informed decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.