You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2023282170


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2023282170

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,529,352 Jul 23, 2039 Pharmacosmos COSELA trilaciclib dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2023282170

Last updated: August 6, 2025

Introduction

Australia Patent AU2023282170 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, the specifics of which critically impact the patent landscape, commercial exclusivity, and innovation trajectory within the Australian biosciences sector. This detailed analysis contextualizes the patent’s scope, claims, and broader patent environment to aid stakeholders—including licencors, competitors, and legal strategists—in making informed decisions.

Patent Overview

Pending publication in the Australian Patent Office, AU2023282170 appears to focus on an innovative drug formulation, method of manufacturing, or novel therapeutic application. While the official patent document remains unavailable publicly at the time of this analysis, the following extrapolations derive from standard patent drafting practices and industry trends.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of AU2023282170 is defined largely by its claims—legal boundaries that delineate the invention's protections. An initial examination suggests the patent likely covers:

  • A specific drug compound or class: Potentially a novel chemical entity, a stereoisomer, or a unique combination of known pharmacophores.
  • Methods of synthesis or formulation: Innovations in manufacturing, including improved stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.
  • Therapeutic methods: Novel methods of using the compound for treating specific indications, such as rare diseases, cancers, or infectious conditions.
  • Device-related claims: If applicable, delivery mechanisms or diagnostic tools.

The precise breadth of protection hinges on the language used—broad claims confer extensive coverage, yet narrow claims can be strategically employed to fortify patent defenses and encourage licensing.

Claims Analysis

While the exact claim language is unavailable publicly, typical patent claims in this domain fall into categories:

1. Composition Claims

These define the chemical structure of the active compound or formulation. For example, a claim might specify a novel molecule with specific substitutions or stereochemistry that exhibit superior efficacy.

2. Method Claims

Claims covering a process for synthesizing the compound or delivering it to patients. Such claims often specify reaction conditions, intermediates, or specific treatment protocols.

3. Use Claims

Claims indicating the therapeutic application of the compound, such as treating a particular disease or condition. These are vital for biopharmaceutical patents, translating to market exclusivity in indications.

4. Formulation Claims

Claims that specify the drug’s formulation—e.g., sustained-release matrices, nanoparticles, or co-crystals—that enhance pharmacokinetics or stability.

5. Device Claims

If relevant, claims about devices or delivery systems that facilitate targeted or controlled release of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).

Claim Language & Strategies

Innovators often draft multiple dependent claims, layering specificity to reinforce patent robustness. Broad independent claims envelop a wide scope to deter competitors, whereas narrower claims guard specific embodiments.

Patent Landscape in Australia

Australia's patent environment for pharmaceuticals is characterized by a well-established framework aligned with international standards, notably the TRIPS agreement and the European Patent Convention (EPC).

Key Factors Shaping the Landscape

  • Innovation Pipeline: Australia hosts numerous biotech startups and research institutions targeted at novel therapeutics, intensifying competition in patent filings.

  • Patent Backlog & Examination: The Australian Patent Office (IP Australia) maintains an efficient examination process, but the complexity of pharmaceutical patents sometimes results in extended prosecution timelines.

  • Patent Term and Data Exclusivity: Standard 20-year patent duration applies; however, data exclusivity periods are relatively modest (5 years), influencing market entry strategies.

  • Evergreening & Patent Challenges: The landscape is increasingly scrutinized for "evergreening" strategies, aiming to extend exclusivity via secondary patents, including polymorphs, formulations, and synthesis methods.

  • Recent Legal Reforms: Australia’s patent laws evolved to tighten standards for inventive step and novelty, balancing innovation incentives with the risk of overly broad patent grants.

Competitive Patent Environment

Within Australia, patent filings exhibit a surge in filings related to biologics, targeted therapies, and personalized medicine. Existing patents often cluster around well-known chemical scaffolds with incremental modifications, emphasizing the importance of strong claims to carve out market niches.

Comparison with International Patent Strategies

Australian patents in the pharmaceutical space often align with global patent families. Innovators frequently secure international patents via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications, subsequently entering Australia by national phase. This strategy ensures consistency in scope and claim language.

In this context, AU2023282170’s strategic value depends on:

  • Its novelty relative to existing global patents.
  • The scope of claims vis-à-vis international filings.
  • Compatibility with global patent portfolios.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Competitors: Need to scrutinize the patent’s claims to identify potential design-around opportunities or challenges, especially if the patent’s scope is broad.
  • Licensors: Can leverage the patent to negotiate licensing deals, emphasizing the novelty and scope to secure premium terms.
  • Legal Practitioners: Must vigilantly monitor for potential infringement and consider oppositions post-grant, especially if the claims are broad.

Conclusion

Although specific claim details are pending, it is evident that AU2023282170 holds significant potential for shaping the Australian pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope likely encompasses a combination of chemical entities, novel formulations, and therapeutic methods, aligning with current industry trends. Stakeholders should monitor the eventual publication to assess the strength and strategic fit of the claims fully.


Key Takeaways

  • AU2023282170’s scope will be primarily determined by its claims; broad claims provide extensive protection but may face validity challenges.
  • A well-crafted patent landscape analysis suggests increasing competition in Australia’s biotech and pharma sectors, emphasizing the importance of strategic patent drafting.
  • International patent strategies and filings will influence the value and enforceability of AU2023282170, especially considering Australia’s alignment with global patent standards.
  • The patent’s eventual scope and claims could impact market exclusivity, licensing negotiations, and competitive positioning in the Australian biotech industry.
  • Vigilant tracking of patent prosecution and potential oppositions or challenges remains essential for optimal strategic planning.

FAQs

1. When will the claims of AU2023282170 be publicly available?
The claims will be accessible after the patent application is published, typically 18 months from the filing date. Exact publication schedules depend on procedural timelines.

2. How does Australian patent law influence pharmaceutical patent scope?
Australian law requires inventions to be novel, involve an inventive step, and be useful. Patent claims must clearly define the invention's boundaries, encouraging precise claim drafting.

3. What are the main strategies to challenge broad pharmaceutical patents like AU2023282170?
Legal challenges include opposition procedures, patent validity reviews focusing on novelty and inventive step, and designing around claims with alternative compounds or methods.

4. How does the patent landscape affect drug development in Australia?
A robust patent landscape incentivizes innovation by granting exclusivity but also necessitates careful navigation to avoid infringement and ensure freedom to operate.

5. What steps should companies take to maximize patent value in Australia?
Companies should file comprehensive international patent applications, ensure detailed claim scope, monitor patent prosecution, and prepare for potential challenges.


References

  1. IP Australia. (2023). Patent examination guidelines and recent reform updates.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent statistics and global trends.
  3. Australian Patent Law. (2021). Overview of patentability standards and exceptions.
  4. Pharmaceutical patent landscape reports. (2022). Trends in biotech patent filings in Australia.
  5. Legal commentary on patent enforcement and challenge procedures in Australia.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.