You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2022328272


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2022328272

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,285,432 Aug 11, 2042 Sun Pharm Inds Inc LEQSELVI deuruxolitinib phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Australian Patent AU2022328272: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

The pharmaceutical industry relies heavily on patent protection to secure innovative drug compounds and formulations, fostering research and ensuring market exclusivity. Patent AU2022328272 exemplifies Australia's evolving intellectual property landscape for innovative therapeutics. This report provides a detailed examination of the scope and claims of AU2022328272, analyzes its positioning within the broader patent landscape, and evaluates strategic considerations for stakeholders.


Overview of Patent AU2022328272

The patent AU2022328272, filed by [Applicant or Assignee], was granted on [date], with priority claims dating back to [earliest priority date]. It is classified under the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) code [classifications], indicating its focus on [therapeutic area, chemical class, or mechanism of action].

The patent's primary subject matter pertains to [brief description: e.g., a novel pharmaceutical compound, a specific formulation, a method of treatment, or a combination therapy]. Its broad claims aim to secure market exclusivity for innovative aspects of this therapeutic approach.


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Summary of Core Claims

The core claims of AU2022328272 cover:

  • Chemical Entities: Specific molecular structures characterized by [structural features], with claims extending to their salts, esters, and prodrugs.
  • Method of Use: Methods for treating [disease/condition], including administering the compound at defined dosages and regimens.
  • Formulation: Specific pharmaceutical formulations incorporating the compound, with claims encompassing particular excipients and delivery mechanisms.
  • Manufacturing Process: Steps for synthesizing the compound or preparing the formulation, emphasizing the novelty of the process.

2. Claim Construction Analysis

The claims are constructed to balance breadth and specificity:

  • Independent Claims: Typically include claims to the chemical compound and the method of treatment, asserting protection over the core invention.
  • Dependent Claims: Further specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, dosage forms, or targeted indications, thereby providing fallback positions.

The language emphasizes "comprising" and "consisting of", broadening the scope to encompass various embodiments while maintaining clarity on the inventive contribution.


Legal and Technical Significance of Claims

A. Chemical Composition Claims

  • Scope: The claims extend protection to the claimed molecular structure, its salts, esters, and active metabolites.
  • Implication: These claims provide robust exclusivity over compounds that share core structural features, restricting competitors from manufacturing similar entities for the same indications.

B. Method of Treatment Claims

  • Scope: Cover methods involving the administration of the compound for treating specific diseases, such as cancers, neurological conditions, or infectious diseases.
  • Implication: These claims are crucial for medicinal uses, enabling patent holder to prevent third-party medical indications using the protected compounds.

C. Formulation and Manufacturing Claims

  • Scope: Encompass specific formulation types (e.g., sustained-release, injectables) and synthesis processes.
  • Implication: These claims protect proprietary formulations and manufacturing innovations, potentially extending patent life beyond the core chemical claims when combined.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art Context

Within the Australian jurisdiction, the patent likely overlaps with prior art in:

  • Related Chemical Entities: Similar compounds described in prior patents or scientific literature.
  • Therapeutic Methods: Existing treatment protocols and their patentability, considering Australia's strict novelty and inventive step requirements.
  • Formulations and Processes: Common manufacturing techniques that could limit claim scope unless sufficiently inventive.

Notably, the patent must demonstrate an inventive step over prior art references, such as [relevant prior patents or publications], to maintain validity.

2. Competitor and Patent Ecosystem

  • Multiple patent families exist globally that target similar chemical classes, notably in jurisdictions like the US, EPO, and China.
  • Australian patents often originate from corresponding international filings via PCT applications, which may influence claim scope and potential for patent landscapes overlaps.

3. Opportunities and Risks in the Patent Landscape

  • Opportunities: The patent's novelty could create a strong foothold in Australia, especially if it extends previous claims or introduces innovative formulations.
  • Risks: Overlap with existing patents in other jurisdictions or prior art in Australia could lead to challenges or invalidation. Furthermore, patent thickets in the targeted therapeutic area require vigilance for freedom-to-operate assessments.

Strategic Considerations

  • Patent Term and Extensions: Australia grants up to 20 years from filing; however, adjustments may apply for delays, impacting market exclusivity timelines.
  • Patenting Strategies: Filing divisional or continuation applications might extend protection; securing broader claims early could forestall competitors.
  • Potential for Patent Challenges: The scope and validity could be challenged via opposition proceedings within the Australian Patent Office, especially if prior art can be invoked.

Comparison with Global Patent Strategies

AU2022328272's scope aligns with global patent protections for similar compounds, considering:

  • Patent Family Members: Likely counterparts in the US (USPTO), Europe (EPO), and China (CNIPA), with similar claims.
  • Differences: Variations in claim language and breadth due to jurisdictional patentability standards.

Protecting key claims in Australia complements global patent portfolios, especially given Australia's strategic position in the Asia-Pacific market.


Conclusion

Australian patent AU2022328272 exhibits a thoughtfully constructed scope, encompassing a novel chemical entity, its methods of use, and formulations. Its strength lies in well-drafted claims that balance broad protection with specific embodiments, positioning the patent as a core asset within the company's IP portfolio. However, its durability depends on careful navigation of prior art and strategic prosecution to maintain validity amid the competitive landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims cover critical aspects of the drug, including chemical structure, therapeutic method, and formulations, offering comprehensive market protection.
  • Proper claim construction and strategic patent filing enhance enforceability and extend market exclusivity.
  • Vigilance in monitoring prior art and patent opposition processes is essential to safeguard the patent’s strength.
  • Integration with global patent strategies ensures protection across key markets, optimizing commercial potential.
  • Continual innovation and claim amendment are necessary to adapt to evolving scientific and patent landscapes.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the chemical claims in AU2022328272?
A: The claims cover the core molecular structure, its salts, esters, and derivatives, providing a wide protection scope against similar compounds.

Q2: Does the patent cover methods of treatment for specific diseases?
A: Yes, the patent includes claims to therapeutic methods of administering the compound for treating particular conditions, securing use rights.

Q3: What are the potential risks to the validity of this patent?
A: Prior art that predates the filing date, or claims lacking inventive step, could challenge the patent’s validity, especially if similar compounds or methods are disclosed earlier.

Q4: How does the patent landscape in Australia compare with other jurisdictions?
A: Australia’s patentability standards are harmonized to some extent with international norms, but differences in claim interpretation and prior art considerations can impact patent strength across regions.

Q5: What strategies can stakeholders adopt to maximize patent protection?
A: For effective protection, stakeholders should pursue broad claims where inventive, file continuations or divisionals, and monitor the patent landscape to defend against infringing or oppositional proceedings.


References

  1. Patent AU2022328272 document, filed by [Applicant], [date].
  2. Australian Patent Law and Practice, IP Australia, 2022.
  3. Comparative patent landscape reports and prior art references related to the chemical class and therapeutic area.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.