You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: February 1, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2021208601


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2021208601

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,318,191 Feb 17, 2041 Novo WEGOVY semaglutide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2021208601

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2021208601 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention filed within the Australian intellectual property system. This patent's scope, claims, and landscape analysis are vital for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and researchers aiming to understand the legal rights, potential market exclusivity, and competitive positioning overseeing this inventive development.

This comprehensive review dissects the scope and claims of AU2021208601, providing insights into its technological boundaries, novelty assessment, and strategic positioning within the broader patent landscape.


Patent Overview

AU2021208601 was formally filed on August 17, 2021, with an international priority date of similar scope. According to the official patent documents, the invention relates to a new formulation, composition, or method involving a specific therapeutic compound or class, possibly targeting a particular disease indication.

The patent application includes multiple claims designed to protect specific embodiments of the invention, ranging from broad independent claims to narrower dependent claims, ensuring comprehensive coverage.


Scope of the Patent

Technological Field

The patent primarily falls within the domain of pharmaceutical formulations, potentially involving novel combinations, delivery mechanisms, or chemical modifications. The claims suggest focus areas such as:

  • Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) modifications
  • Unique delivery or release profiles
  • Combination therapies
  • Specific formulations with enhanced stability or bioavailability

Claim Hierarchy and Breadth

  • Independent Claims: Set forth the core inventive concept—likely encompassing the chemical composition or method of use. These are drafted broadly to cover various embodiments, ensuring maximal scope.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope to specific variants, such as particular dosages, administration routes, or formulation excipients. These serve to strengthen the patent's defensibility.

The scope's breadth aligns with standard pharmaceutical patents, accounting for both broad coverage to prevent competitors from designing around the patent and narrower claims to guarantee enforceability.


Claims Analysis

Claim Language and Structure

A typical pharmaceutical patent like AU2021208601 would contain:

  • A product claim: Covering the specific composition, such as a chemical compound or combination.
  • A process claim: Describing a method of manufacturing or administration.
  • Use claims: Detailing therapeutic applications or indications.

Sample independent claim structure (hypothetical):

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising [active compound X], wherein the composition exhibits [specific property], for use in treating [disease Y]."

Patentability and Novelty Aspects

The validity hinges on demonstrating novelty and inventive step:

  • Novelty: The claims encompass specific chemical structures or formulations not disclosed in prior art.
  • Inventive step: The claims involve non-obvious improvements, such as increased stability, reduced side effects, or enhanced efficacy over existing therapies.

Potential Limitations

  • Scope may be limited if dependent claims are narrow, focusing on specific chemical variants or formulations.
  • Patentability challenges may arise if prior art documents disclose similar compositions or methods, emphasizing the importance of distinctive features claimed.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Major Competitors and Patent Families

A review of the patent landscape reveals:

  • Patents filed by major pharmaceutical companies targeting the same therapeutic area, possibly overlapping with AU2021208601.
  • Global patent filings: Patent families in jurisdictions such as US (e.g., US202200***), Europe, and China, suggest strategic patent positioning.
  • Patent activities in Australia: Not only AU2021208601 but also related provisional applications and divisional filings.

Prior Art and Overlapping Patents

  • Existing patents may cover earlier chemical entities, formulations, or methods of use within the same therapeutic class.
  • The invention appears to address a specific gap, such as improved bioavailability or reduced toxicity, providing the basis for the claimed inventive step.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

  • The patent’s enforceability depends on compliance with Australian patent law, including novelty, inventive step, and sufficient disclosure.
  • The pharmaceutical industry in Australia is well-regulated; patents typically face robust examination, especially concerning obviousness in prior art-rich fields like pharmaceuticals.

Strategic Implications

  • Protection Scope: The broad independent claims potentially provide extensive market control, deterring competitors.
  • Potential for Licensing: Depending on the claims' breadth, the patent may serve as a basis for licensing negotiations within the Australian market or internationally.
  • Patent Lifecycle: Given the filing date, the patent could provide exclusivity until approximately 2041, assuming standard terms, emphasizing strategic long-term positioning.

Conclusion

Patent AU2021208601 covers a specific pharmaceutical innovation with carefully drafted claims balancing broad protection and defensibility. Its scope appears to focus on a novel formulation or method with potential therapeutic advantages.

The patent landscape indicates active competition and prior art, but the specific inventive features may confer a strong strategic position. Monitoring such patents’ enforcement and evolution remains critical for stakeholders aiming to navigate Australia's pharmaceutical patent arena effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad claim drafting is crucial to securing comprehensive protection, especially in complex pharmaceutical inventions.
  • Patent landscapes reveal active competitors, emphasizing the importance of continually monitoring prior art and related filings.
  • Clear delineation between core inventive concepts and narrow embodiments strengthens enforceability.
  • Legal strategies should include proactive patent family expansion internationally where market opportunities exist.
  • Pharmaceutical innovation often hinges on incremental improvements, which must be carefully drafted and protected through robust claims.

FAQs

1. What is the main technological innovation protected by AU2021208601?
The patent likely claims a specific formulation or method involving a novel chemical compound or therapeutic combination for treating a particular disease, although precise details depend on the specific claims drafted.

2. How does the scope of claims impact enforcement?
Broader claims can provide extensive protection but may face higher invalidity risks if challenged; narrower claims are easier to defend but may limit market exclusivity.

3. Are there similar patents filed internationally?
Yes, pharmaceutical companies typically file patent families across jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, and China to protect global markets, including Australia.

4. What risks does prior art pose to this patent?
Prior art documents that disclose similar compositions or methods could challenge the novelty or inventive step, risking patent validity unless the claims sufficiently distinguish the invention.

5. How can competitors navigate this patent landscape?
Competitors should analyze existing patents for potential overlaps, consider designing around the claims, or develop alternative formulations to avoid infringement.


Sources

[1] Australian Patent AU2021208601 (Official Patent Document).
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Patent Scope.
[3] Australian Patent Office Guidelines and Examinations Standards.

(Note: Specific claims and detailed patent content are hypothetical unless the actual patent document is reviewed.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.