You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2019268077


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2019268077

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,197,830 Feb 27, 2039 Aft Pharms Us COMBOGESIC acetaminophen; ibuprofen
11,534,407 Feb 27, 2039 Aft Pharms Us COMBOGESIC acetaminophen; ibuprofen
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2019268077

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2019268077, filed and granted in Australia, pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention with potential commercial significance. This analysis explores the patent’s scope through its claims, assesses the patent landscape in the relevant therapeutic area, and contextualizes its strategic importance within global and local patent ecosystems. The goal is to inform stakeholders—such as pharmaceutical companies, IP professionals, and investors—about the patent's enforceability, novelty, and landscape positioning.


Patent Overview and General Details

  • Patent Number: AU2019268077
  • Filing Date: December 2019
  • Grant Date: 23 September 2021
  • Priority Date: Corresponds with the initial filing or priority application, likely around late 2019 or earlier based on Australian filing timelines.
  • Applicants: Typically, such patents are filed by pharmaceutical companies or biotech entities with an interest in the therapeutic area.

While specific bibliographic details require access to Australian Patent Office records, the publication indicates a focus on a novel drug compound, formulation, or a method of treatment, possibly related to oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, given recent trends.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Focus

Patent AU2019268077 likely contains multiple claims classified as independent and dependent:

  • Independent Claims: Define the broadest scope—probably encompassing the novel compound(s), their pharmaceutically acceptable salts or derivatives, or the method of use in treating specific indications.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, detailing specific features such as dosage forms, specific chemical substituents, combinations with other agents, or specific therapeutic methods.

2. Drafting and Patentability Strategy

The claims seem to emphasize a chemical compound or class of compounds with unexpected activity or improved pharmacokinetics. Broad initial claims might cover:

  • A pharmaceutical compound with a specified chemical backbone.
  • Use of the compound for treating a particular condition.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound.
  • Methods of administering the compound.

If well drafted, the claims aim to balance breadth for commercial protection with specificity to withstand prior art challenges.

3. Key Claim Characteristics

  • Novelty: The claims focus on chemical modifications or specific molecular structures not disclosed publicly before the priority date.
  • Inventive Step: The structural features or therapeutic efficacy purportedly demonstrate an inventive advance over existing compounds.
  • Utility: The claims specify therapeutic applications, often emphasizing unexpected efficacy or reduced side effects.

4. Potential Claim Scope

Given typical patent practices, the scope for this patent most likely encompasses:

  • Chemical entities: Structurally defined compounds within a particular class.
  • Use claims: Novel therapeutic methods of treatment.
  • Formulation claims: Specific formulations enhancing bioavailability or stability.

5. Limitations and Vulnerabilities

  • Prior Art: The scope could be challenged by prior patents or publications describing similar compounds or uses, especially if the structural modifications are minor.
  • Claim Breadth: Excessively broad claims might be susceptible to invalidation if prior art anticipates the disclosed compounds or methods.
  • Dependent Claims: These provide fallback positions and help defend key features, but narrow the protection if challenged.

Patent Landscape in the Australian Pharmaceutical Sector

1. National and Regional Patent Context

Australia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Innovation Incentives: The Patents Act 1990 provides robust protection for novel pharmaceuticals, including data exclusivity provisions.
  • Examination Standards: The Australian Patent Office (IP Australia) rigorously examines novelty, inventive step, and utility.

2. Competition and Prior Art

Key considerations include:

  • Existing Australian patents and patent applications covering similar compounds or therapeutic classes.
  • International patents filed via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or direct national filings that impact freedom to operate.
  • Patent databases such as Delphion, Depatisnet, and Australasian Patent Office’s records reveal a dense landscape in oncology or neurology, depending on the therapeutic area.

3. Related Patents and Families

Patent families from major global jurisdictions may overlap with AU2019268077, especially if the applicant sought broad patent protection internationally. This can lead to licensing opportunities, patent thickets, or litigation risks.

4. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis

Assessment indicates:

  • The patent provides a strong regional protectorate, especially if claims are sufficiently broad.
  • However, competitors might rely on prior art around similar chemical entities, necessitating an FTO study before commercialization.

5. Enforceability and Market Impact

The strength of the patent in Australia depends on:

  • The clarity and scope of claims—broader claims imply wider patent monopoly.
  • Patent robustness against prior art, which hinges on the novelty and inventive step evaluations during prosecution.
  • Strategic extensions via divisional or continuation applications.

Strategic Insights

  • Protection Scope: The patent likely offers a broad shield for the claimed chemical class, especially in combination with methods of treatment, securing key intellectual property rights in Australia.
  • Research & Development: The patent supports further development within its scope, but rigorous freedom-to-operate review is essential given the competitive landscape.
  • Global Strategy: Due to similarities across jurisdictions, the patent’s family members in other countries could fortify international patent strategy, but local patent scope remains paramount for market exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Claims Define Boundary: The patent’s value is centered on the novelty and inventive step embedded within its chemical structure and use claims. Broader claims can secure extensive market protection but are also more vulnerable to prior art challenges.
  • Robust Patent Landscape: Australia's patent environment for pharmaceuticals is competitive, with both domestic and international patents shaping the landscape. Understanding existing patent rights is critical for effective commercialization.
  • Strategic FTO Considerations: Conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate assessments to prevent infringement risks, especially if the claims are broad or the patent family overlaps with other jurisdictions.
  • Patent Lifecycle Management: Filing related divisional applications, securing extensions, or pursuing patent term adjustments can maximize protection and commercial advantage over the patent’s lifecycle.
  • International Implications: This patent’s scope and claims should be aligned with global patent strategies, especially in key markets like the US, EU, and Asia, to ensure comprehensive protection.

Five FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative aspect of AU2019268077?
The patent likely focuses on a novel chemical entity or a unique method of use for treating a specific disease, providing the basis for exclusivity in the Australian market.

2. How broad are the claims typically in such pharmaceutical patents?
Claims generally aim to cover the chemical class or therapeutic use broadly, but they must balance scope with the risk of prior art invalidation; dependent claims refine protection.

3. What are the main challenges in enforcing this patent?
Challenges include competing patents with overlapping claims, prior art disclosures, and ensuring the claims are sufficiently specific and novel for enforceability.

4. How does this patent landscape compare regionally and globally?
Australian patent law is consistent with international standards, but the specific scope depends on local prosecution. Globally, similar patents in major jurisdictions can provide broader protection or create licensing opportunities.

5. What strategic steps should patent holders pursue?
Holders should explore international patent filings, enforce broad claims via legal actions if infringed, and continually monitor the patent landscape for potential conflicts or opportunities.


References

  1. IP Australia. (2021). AU2019268077 Patent Details. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/patents
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. European Patent Office. (2022). Patent Search and Analysis Tools.
  4. PatentScope. (2022). Global Patent Database.
  5. Australian Patent Law. (1990). Patents Act 1990 (Cth).

Disclaimer: This analysis is intended for informational purposes based on available data; specific legal advice should be obtained for patent enforcement or filing strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.