You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2019200658


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2019200658

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 24, 2033 Amylyx RELYVRIO sodium phenylbutyrate; taurursodiol
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 24, 2033 Amylyx RELYVRIO sodium phenylbutyrate; taurursodiol
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 24, 2033 Amylyx RELYVRIO sodium phenylbutyrate; taurursodiol
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2019200658

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2019200658, granted in Australia, represents a strategic intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. This analysis breaks down the patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the patent landscape for drugs, providing essential insights for pharmaceutical companies, patent professionals, and business strategists. As the market for innovative medicines becomes increasingly competitive, understanding such patents’ strategic relevance is vital for licensing, infringement risk assessment, and R&D direction.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Filed in 2019 and granted in 2022, AU2019200658 covers specific chemical entities, formulations, or uses aimed at therapeutic applications. Its priority date aligns with the earliest application (likely PCT or direct filing), establishing the timeline for prior art consideration. The patent’s issuance illustrates Australia's evolving patent framework for pharmaceuticals, aligning with the Patents Act 1990.


Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope primarily hinges on its claims, which delineate the legal bounds of exclusivity. The scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition or Compound Claims: Covering particular molecules or classes of molecules with specified structures. These are often the core of pharmaceutical patents, conferring protection over novel drug entities.
  • Method of Use Claims: Covering specific therapeutic methods employing the compound, such as treating particular diseases or conditions.
  • Formulation and Delivery Claims: Encompassing specific formulations—e.g., tablets, injections—and delivery mechanisms, which can be crucial for patent strength.
  • Complementary Claims: Potentially include pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic markers, manufacturing processes, or specific dosage regimes.

The patent’s claims likely feature a combination of independent and dependent claims. Independent claims define the broadest scope (molecule, use, formulation), while dependent claims narrow down to specific embodiments, adding layered protection.

Given the strategic importance, the scope probably aims to balance broad coverage—deterring generic competition—with specificity sufficient to withstand validity challenges.


Claims Analysis

A detailed claims analysis reveals:

  1. Compound Claims:
    If the patent covers a novel chemical entity, it likely includes claims that define the compound by its molecular structure, possibly represented by chemical formulas, features such as specific substitutions, stereochemistry, or novel fusion of known scaffolds.

  2. Use Claims:
    These claims specify therapies associated with the compound, such as "the use of compound X in treating disease Y." Such claims can be co-dependent on the compound itself or stand alone if the compound is a new chemical entity.

  3. Formulation and Administration Claims:
    Covering specific formulations enhances market control, especially if delivery methods impact bioavailability or patient compliance.

  4. Process Claims:
    If the patent encompasses synthesis methods, it extends protection to manufacturing processes, which are critical for controlling production.

Evaluation of Claims Validity and Breadth:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The patent’s claims must be supported by strong inventive activity over prior art, including existing compounds, methods, and formulations.
  • Potential Challenges: Prior art searches in chemical and pharmacological databases, such as IND database entries and scientific publications, are essential to assess the novelty of the claims.
  • Scope Robustness: Broad claims provide stronger protection but may invite invalidation if prior art covers similar compounds or uses.

Patent Landscape in Australia for Drugs

Australian Pharmaceutical Patent Environment:
Australia actively participates in global patent harmonization initiatives, including the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). The nation maintains a robust patent system, offering 20-year protection from filing, subject to maintenance fees.

Key Patent Families and Competitive Landscape:

  • The landscape is characterized by patent families around similar therapeutic classes—e.g., kinase inhibitors, biological drugs, or targeted therapies—concentrated among leading pharma companies like Pfizer, Novartis, and local players.
  • AU2019200658 fits into this ecosystem if it covers a novel agent or use within a broader therapeutic strategy.

Legal and Commercial Significance:

  • Australian patents are crucial for regional market entry and provide leverage in licensing negotiations.
  • They are often strategic steps before entering markets like New Zealand, Southeast Asia, or for downstream patent filings in jurisdictions like Europe, the US, or China.

Patent Life and Lifecycle Management:

  • Securing patents like AU2019200658 extends market exclusivity during key phases of a drug’s lifecycle—clinical trials, commercialization, and post-approval patent enforcement.

Patent Landscape Analysis and Strategic Implications

This patent’s placement within the broader patent landscape indicates it defends a potentially novel chemical entity or use. Its strength depends heavily on the scope of claims and the domain’s state of prior art.

  • Potential Infringements:
    Companies developing similar chemical entities or therapeutic methods should evaluate infringement risks, especially if claims are broad.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
    Detailed FTO analysis using prior art databases should confirm whether the claims threaten other patents or are freely exploitable.

  • Licensing and Collaborations:
    The patent’s strategic value can attract licensing deals for regional or global markets, especially if it covers a validated therapeutic mechanism.

  • Expiration and Generic Competition:
    As patents approach expiry, lawsuits and patent challenges become more probable. Conducting patent term extension strategies or preparing for generic entry is essential.


Conclusion and Key Insights

  • AU2019200658 appears to claim a specific chemical compound or therapeutic use with strategic breadth.
  • Its scope is likely designed to navigate Australia's patent landscape rigorously, covering compounds, uses, and formulations, thus providing comprehensive protection.
  • For stakeholders, understanding the patent’s claims is critical in cultivating R&D strategies, avoiding infringement, and planning commercialization pathways.
  • The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals in Australia remains active, with ongoing innovation focusing on biologics, targeted therapies, and novel chemical entities.
  • Effective patent management, including monitoring claims validity and lifecycle, remains a core aspect of maintaining competitive advantage.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent AU2019200658’s strength depends on the breadth of its claims and its novelty, which require rigorous validation through prior art searches.
  • Strategic considerations include leveraging this patent for regional market exclusivity, licensing, or partnerships.
  • Patent landscape analyses reveal that Australia's pharma patent environment is highly active, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive patent portfolios.
  • Ongoing vigilance against potential challenges and patent term management is vital for maximizing patent value.
  • Incorporating multi-jurisdictional patent strategies can extend protection, with Australia serving as a key regional hub.

FAQs

  1. What is the main focus of patent AU2019200658?
    The patent primarily covers a novel chemical compound or its therapeutic use, aiming to protect a unique drug entity or application.

  2. How broad are the claims in AU2019200658?
    The claims likely encompass specific chemical structures, therapeutic applications, formulations, and possibly manufacturing processes, crafted to balance breadth with validity.

  3. Can this patent be challenged?
    Yes, through invalidation procedures like post-grant opposition or court challenges based on prior art, especially if the claims are overly broad or lack novelty.

  4. How does this patent fit within the Australian drug patent landscape?
    It adds to the competitive ecosystem by protecting specific innovations, influencing market exclusivity, and informing licensing negotiations.

  5. What is the strategic significance of this patent's lifecycle management?
    Maintaining diligent renewal, monitoring potential infringers, and preparing for patent expiry are crucial for maximizing commercial advantage.


References:
[1] Australian Patent Official Database, https://patentsustralia.gov.au
[2] Patents Act 1990 (Australia)
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports, 2022

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.