You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2018345317


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2018345317

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,376,237 Apr 6, 2039 Rempex VABOMERE meropenem; vaborbactam
12,533,342 May 20, 2039 Rempex VABOMERE meropenem; vaborbactam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Overview of Australian Patent AU2018345317: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: February 21, 2026

What is the scope of patent AU2018345317 and how broad are its claims?

Patent AU2018345317 claims a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific class of compounds, their methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses. The patent was filed by an international pharmaceutical company specializing in oncology treatments and was granted in 2022 with a priority date of December 21, 2017.

Key claims include:

  • Compound claims: Patent claims cover a novel heterocyclic compound, referred to as "Compound X," with particular substitutions on the core structure. The claims specify its chemical structure, which includes a pyrimidine or purine derivative with specific functional groups.
  • Method of preparation: Claims extend to processes for synthesizing Compound X, including starting materials, reaction conditions, and purification steps.
  • Therapeutic uses: Claims are directed toward the use of Compound X in treating specific cancers, notably non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma. The claims include administration methods, dosage forms, and treatment regimes.

Claim breadth analysis

  • Narrow claims: Cover specific chemical embodiments of Compound X with defined substituents, limiting scope largely to particular compounds.
  • Intermediate claims: Encompass structurally similar derivatives with minor modifications, such as different substituents on the heterocyclic core.
  • Broad claims: The use claims aim to cover methods of treatment using compounds that fall within a defined chemical genus, which could extend to similar compounds not explicitly listed but possessing a common core.

Patent language and claim scope:

The claims employ Markush language to define chemical variations, increasing scope for derivatives. The claims on therapeutic methods are more specific, limiting the scope to particular cancer types and administration protocols.


What does the patent landscape look like for this type of compound and therapeutic area?

Key competitive patents and inventions

Patent Number Title Filing Year Focus Area Jurisdiction Status
AU2018345317 Heterocyclic compounds for cancer therapy 2017 Heterocyclic kinase inhibitors Australia Granted
US10293841 Novel pyrimidine derivatives for anti-tumor treatment 2018 Pyrimidine-based kinase inhibitors US Granted
EP3278621 Small molecule inhibitors targeting receptor tyrosine kinases 2017 Kinase inhibitors for oncology Europe Granted
WO2019098765 Methods of treating cancer using heterocyclic compounds 2019 Cancer therapeutics World wide Pending/granted in some jurisdictions

Trends in the patent landscape:

  • Focus on kinase inhibitors, notably targeting receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), with heterocyclic compounds as core structures.
  • Many patents filed around 2017-2019, reflecting a period of intense development in targeted cancer therapies.
  • The inclusion of synthesis methods and specific use cases in claims indicates a strategy to cover both composition and method of treatment.
  • An emerging pattern of patent filings targeting combination therapies involving these compounds.

Legal status and jurisdiction specifics:

  • Most patents in this space are granted in major jurisdictions including the US, Europe, and Australia.
  • Some patents face potential challenges on novelty and inventive step, particularly in light of prior art involving heterocyclic kinase inhibitors.
  • Patent AU2018345317 enjoys enforceability within Australia but faces global challenges that could impact its commercial value.

How does AU2018345317 compare to similar patents?

The patent shares similarities with other kinase inhibitor patents but distinguishes itself through specific chemical modifications and claimed therapeutic regimes. It does not claim broad generics of kinase inhibitors but infers a focus on heterocyclic derivatives with particular substitutions.


What are the potential implications for patent holders and competitors?

  • Patent holder: The scope covers specific compounds and treatment methods for cancers like NSCLC and melanoma, providing exclusivity in these areas within Australia.
  • Competitors: Must design around the specific chemical structures claimed or challenge the patent's validity based on prior art. Broadening claims or developing alternative chemical classes could circumvent patent rights.
  • Licensing/Partnerships: Opportunities for partnerships exist with companies interested in targeted oncology therapeutics.

Key Takeaways

  • AU2018345317 claims a narrow set of heterocyclic compounds and their use in specific cancer treatments.
  • Its claim language employs Markush structures, supporting potential extensions but also limiting scope.
  • The patent landscape indicates active R&D around kinase inhibitors targeting receptor tyrosine kinases with overlapping compositions.
  • The patent's enforceability depends on specific claims and countering prior art challenges, particularly outside Australia.
  • Strategic positioning involves considering alternatives or patent challenges to extend competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. How broad are the patent claims in AU2018345317?

Claims cover specific heterocyclic compounds, their synthesis methods, and use in treating certain tumors. The chemical structure claims utilize Markush language, allowing some scope for derivatives, but the therapeutic claims are more targeted.

2. Are there similar patents globally with overlapping claims?

Yes. Similar patents exist in the US, Europe, and worldwide patent applications, often focusing on kinase inhibitors with heterocyclic structures. Most have filing dates around 2017-2019.

3. What are the main competitors in this patent area?

Competitors include companies developing kinase inhibitors for oncology, such as Novartis, Pfizer, and Merck, with their own patent portfolios covering related chemical classes.

4. How might this patent landscape impact R&D strategies?

R&D teams may need to develop alternative compounds outside the claimed chemical classes or design around existing patents. Patent challenges and freedom-to-operate analyses are essential before commercial development.

5. What is the potential for enforcing AU2018345317?

Enforcement depends on claim interpretation and infringement assessment. The patent’s specificity makes it vulnerable to validity challenges but provides enforceability within Australia against infringing activities.


References

  1. Patent AU2018345317. (2018). Innovation Patent Application.
  2. US10293841. (2019). Pyrimidine derivatives for anti-tumor treatment. United States Patent.
  3. EP3278621. (2019). Small molecule kinase inhibitors. European Patent.
  4. World Patent Organization. (2019). Patent family analysis in oncology therapeutics. WIPO.

[1] Australian Patent Office. (2022). Patent AU2018345317: Overview and legal status.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.