You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2018344402


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2018344402

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 4, 2038 Genentech Inc EVRYSDI risdiplam
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 1, 2038 Genentech Inc EVRYSDI risdiplam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2018344402

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2018344402, granted by the Australian Patent Office, pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, specifically addressing novel compounds, formulations, or methods for treating medical conditions. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is essential for pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D strategists aiming to navigate patent rights, avoid infringement, and identify licensing opportunities within Australia.

This analysis synthesizes available patent document information, emphasizing the scope of claims, potential competitors’ portfolios, and the broader patent environment surrounding this patent. The goal is to illustrate its strategic importance and potential limitations within the Australian patent system.


1. Patent Scope and Claims Overview

a. Patent Abstract and Invention Summary

While the exact patent document details are not publicly accessible through open databases, typical pharmaceutical patent claims, especially in Australia, revolve around:

  • Novel chemical entities (new compounds)
  • Pharmaceutical formulations (compositions, delivery systems)
  • Therapeutic methods (administration, use in specific diseases)
  • Manufacturing processes

The claims in AU2018344402 likely encompass one or multiple of these aspects, crafted to secure broad protection or specific novelty over prior art.

b. Claim Structure

Australian patents generally contain:

  • Independent claims: Define the core of the invention, often covering the compound or method broadly.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, formulations, or uses.

Based on standard practice, the patent possibly includes:

  • Compound claims: Covering a chemical structure with specific substituents.
  • Use claims: Covering therapeutic applications based on the compound.
  • Formulation claims: Covering methods of delivery or combination with excipients.
  • Process claims: Covering synthesis routes.

c. Scope of Claims

In the context of this patent, the scope probably includes:

  • A chemical class or genus of compounds, potentially broad, possibly claiming derivatives, analogs, or salts.
  • Therapeutic use in specific indications (e.g., oncology, neurology).
  • Delivery methods that enhance bioavailability or stability.
  • Manufacturing processes for high purity or yield.

The extent of breadth will depend on how the independent claims are drafted. More broadly drafted claims tend to cover many derivatives but risk narrower dependent claims or prior art challenges.


2. Patent Landscape in the Australian Pharma Sector

a. Life Cycle and Patent Families

The patent landscape for pharmaceutical agents often includes:

  • Priority filings in multiple jurisdictions, building a patent family (e.g., PCT applications).
  • Secondary patents (sometimes called "patent thickets") to extend market exclusivity via formulation, method, or new indications.
  • Patent thickets emerging to protect commercial variants and complementary innovations.

For AU2018344402, investigators should analyze whether:

  • It references or overlaps with earlier patent families.
  • It is part of a broader patent strategy, including supplementary filings, to extend protection.

b. Competitor Patent Rights

Competitors likely own patents covering similar compounds, formulations, or therapeutic uses; these include:

  • Blocking patents preventing entry of generics.
  • Patent clusters around specific chemical classes or mechanisms of action.

In Australia, patent rights are territorial, but global players often file strategically to cover key markets ahead of generic entry.

c. Patent Expiry and Litigation

Typically, pharmaceutical patents have a 20-year term from the filing date, but:

  • Patent term extensions (available under Australian law for regulatory delays).
  • Litigation or opposition possibilities—patents can be challenged on grounds like lack of novelty or inventive step.

As of now, AU2018344402 appears active; monitoring patent expiry and potential challenges is critical for commercialization planning.


3. Analysis of the Claims’ Validity and Strength

a. Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent's claims must demonstrate:

  • Novelty over prior art existing before the filing date.
  • Inventive step—non-obviousness over prior art, particularly for chemical compounds, which often face patent hurdles.

Given the competitive nature of pharmaceutical patenting, the claims likely specify unique substituents, specific stereochemistry, or novel combinations to establish these criteria.

b. Patentability Challenges

  • Anticipation: Prior art references with similar compounds or uses could threaten validity.
  • Obviousness: If derivatives or uses are predictable based on existing compounds, claims risk invalidation.

Legal validity depends on the robustness of the claim language and available prior art. Diligent patent drafting helps mitigate these risks.

c. Claim Enforceability

  • Claims with narrow scope are easier to enforce but may offer limited commercial protection.
  • Broad claims risk invalidation but provide wider coverage if upheld.

The patent's enforceability also hinges on thorough prosecution, including response strategies to office actions and opposition proceedings.


4. Strategic Implications in the Patent Landscape

a. Opportunities

  • Freedom to operate (FTO): Analyzing this patent in tandem with others helps determine freedom to develop or commercialize similar compounds.
  • Licensing and partnerships: The patent owner might seek licensees for specific indications or formulations.
  • Patent extensions: Exploring possible supplementary protections like supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

b. Risks

  • Patent thickets or overlapping rights potentially complicate commercialization.
  • Patent expiry timelines influence investment decisions.
  • Potential infringement risk if competing patents claim similar compounds or uses.

c. Regional and Global Strategy

Considering Australia's geographical and market importance, aligning this patent with international filings (e.g., PCT, US, EU) enhances global protection, especially if Australian patents fade or face challenges.


5. Regulatory and Commercial Context

Australian patent law aligns with international standards but includes unique provisions, like the poison schedule controls influencing pharmaceutical patent commercialization. Also, patenting new formulations or uses must align with clinical development timelines and regulatory approvals from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of AU2018344402 likely encompasses a novel chemical compound, its formulations, and therapeutic uses. Its strength hinges on claim drafting specificity, patent prosecution quality, and prior art landscape.
  • The patent landscape in Australia is characterized by overlapping patents, potential blocking rights, and strategic patent extensions, which collectively influence market exclusivity.
  • Legal threats such as anticipation or obviousness may impact validity; ongoing monitoring of prior art and potential opposition is essential.
  • To maximize commercial value, licensees and patentees should consider broader international patent strategies and alignment with clinical development plans.
  • Patent expiry timelines and potential patent term extensions are critical considerations for long-term market planning.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims likely to be in AU2018344402?
Claims typically range from broad to specific. Broad claims cover extensive compounds or uses but face higher invalidation risks; narrower claims provide limited protection but are easier to defend.

2. Can this patent block generic drug entry in Australia?
Yes. As a granted Australian patent, it can serve as a blocking right against generic manufacturers, provided it is valid and enforceable.

3. Are there ways for competitors to circumvent this patent?
Competitors may design around the claims by developing chemically distinct compounds or alternative formulations that do not infringe on the patent’s scope.

4. What is the typical lifespan of this patent?
Australian patents last 20 years from the filing date, with possible extensions like SPCs, subject to regulatory delays.

5. How does this patent fit into global patent strategies?
It may be a part of a broader international patent family, supporting global commercialization plans, especially if aligned with filing strategies in other jurisdictions.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2018344402: Full specification available through patent repositories.
  2. Australian Patent Law: Patents Act 1990 (Cth).
  3. Patent Strategy in Pharmaceuticals: World Patent Knowledge Database.
  4. Patent Office Guidelines: Australian Patent Office Examination Guidelines.
  5. Global Patent Trends in Pharma: WIPO Patent Report 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.