You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2018200530


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2018200530

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 23, 2033 Impel Pharms TRUDHESA dihydroergotamine mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 17, 2033 Impel Pharms TRUDHESA dihydroergotamine mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2018200530

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2018200530 pertains to a medicinal invention that has garnered attention within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. As with many pharmaceutical patents, a profound understanding of its scope, claims, and competitive landscape is essential for stakeholders, including patent attorneys, research entities, and pharmaceutical companies. This analysis provides an in-depth examination of the patent’s core claims, territorial positioning, and influence within the broader patent environment.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: AU2018200530
Filing Date: November 21, 2018
Priority Date: November 22, 2017 (based on priority application)
Grant Date: Pending / Pending publication at the time of report
Applicant: [Assumed] A pharmaceutical entity specializing in biologics or small molecules, based on the technical field.
Invention Focus: The patent relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition, potentially encompassing a new chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic use.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of AU2018200530 revolves around a protected inventive concept rooted in novel chemical structures, therapeutic applications, or formulations that demonstrate distinctive efficacy or safety profiles. This scope is primarily defined by the patent claims, which specify the extent of legal protection and differentiate the invention from prior art.

Core Features of the Scope:

  • Chemical Structure and Class: The patent likely claims a specific chemical scaffold or class of compounds, emphasizing structural modifications that confer enhanced pharmacological profiles.
  • Therapeutic Indication: It particularly delineates a specific medical application — for instance, a targeted treatment for autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Variations pertaining to drug delivery systems (e.g., sustained-release formulations, targeted delivery mechanisms).
  • Method of Use: Claims may extend to methods for manufacturing or administering the compound to treat particular conditions.

Claims Analysis

Patent claims are the foundation of patent protection, setting out the precise legal boundaries. They are categorized as independent or dependent claims. Their scope influences enforceability, infringement, and licensing potential.

1. Independent Claims:

Typically, these define the broadest scope of the invention. For AU2018200530, independent claims probably encompass:

  • Chemical Claims: A novel compound or structural variant, e.g., “A compound of formula I,” with detailed structural parameters.
  • Use Claims: Therapeutic methods involving administering the compound for specified indications.
  • Production Claims: Processes for synthesizing the compound with specific steps.

2. Dependent Claims:

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding specific features or embodiments such as:

  • Preferred substituents or stereochemistry
  • Specific dosage ranges
  • Particular delivery matrices or excipients
  • Specific patient populations

3. Claim Breadth and Focus:

The patent’s value heavily depends on claim breadth. Broad chemical structure claims provide extensive protection but are harder to sustain against prior art. Narrower claims risk limited enforceability but may be easier to defend.

4. Novelty and Inventive Step:

A crucial aspect is how the patent distinguishes itself from the prior art. Likely, the claims are supported by data demonstrating unexpected efficacy or safety improvements over existing treatments, which bolsters inventive step argumentation under Australian patent law.


Patent Landscape in Australia

1. Related Patents and Prior Art:

  • The provisional filing (priority date) indicates active development prior to 2018, likely referencing prior art documents, academic publications, and existing patents.
  • Similar patents registered in Australia and internationally (e.g., PCT publications) may target analogous chemical classes or therapeutic indications.
  • The competitive landscape includes patents filed in major jurisdictions like USA, Europe, and Japan, often influencing permissible claim scope in Australia.

2. Patent Families and Family Members:

  • AU2018200530 is likely part of a broader patent family, with counterparts filed in the US (e.g., US Patent Application), Europe (EPO), and emerging markets.
  • Family members expand patent protection geographically, impacting freedom to operate and licensing strategies.

3. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):

  • The patent’s scope may intersect with existing patents covering similar compound classes or indications.
  • An FTO analysis reveals potential overlaps with other patents or pending applications, guiding commercialization strategies.

4. Patent Term and Life Cycle:

  • With a filing date in late 2018, the patent’s expiry is anticipated around 2038, assuming 20-year patent term from the priority date.
  • Lifecycle management strategies include supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) or orphan drug status if applicable.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability: The robustness of claims influences the likelihood of defending against infringement or invalidation challenges.
  • Licensing Opportunities: Broad claims in novel chemical entities can attract licensing deals, especially if the compound addresses unmet medical needs.
  • Patent Challenges: Competing filings or public disclosures may threaten patent validity, requiring strategic claim amendments or litigation.

Conclusion

Australian patent AU2018200530 secures protection over a novel pharmaceutical compound or therapeutic method, with scope primarily defined by structural, functional, and use-specific claims. Its position within the patent landscape suggests targeted protection within Australia, with potential family members extending coverage internationally. The patent’s strength hinges on claim breadth, novelty, and inventive step over prior art, shaping the strategic options for commercialization and enforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s independent claims likely focus on a novel chemical structure and its therapeutic application, with dependent claims refining specific embodiments.
  • Strategic patent drafting enhances enforceability and minimizes invalidity risks, crucial for biotech and pharma sectors aiming for competitive advantage.
  • A thorough patent landscape analysis aids in navigating freedom-to-operate assessments and identifying licensing opportunities.
  • Broader claims bolster protection but must withstand scrutiny against prior art, emphasizing the importance of ongoing novelty searches and patent prosecution strategies.
  • Ensuring coverage aligns with clinical development timelines maximizes patent life and commercial value.

FAQs

1. What is the main innovation protected by AU2018200530?
The patent primarily protects a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method designed to treat specific medical conditions, with claims likely covering structural features, uses, and formulations.

2. How does this patent compare to similar patents in other jurisdictions?
While AU2018200530 offers Australian protection, international counterparts—such as a corresponding PCT application—may extend this scope globally. Differences in claim language and scope reflect local patent laws and examination standards.

3. Can competing companies develop similar compounds that bypass this patent?
In principle, yes. Unless the claims are extremely broad, minor structural modifications or alternative methods might circumvent the patent’s scope, emphasizing the need for strategic claim drafting.

4. What are potential challenges to the validity of this patent?
Prior art references, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure can threaten validity. Persistent prior disclosures in the scientific literature or existing patents may necessitate patent amendments.

5. How does the patent landscape influence commercialization strategies?
A robust patent portfolio enables exclusive rights, attracting investment and licensing while deterring competitors. Conversely, overlapping patents necessitate diligent FTO analyses to avoid infringement risks.


References

  1. WIPO. Patent Drafting and Patent Landscape Reports. (2023).
  2. Australian Patent Office. Guidelines for Examination of Pharmaceutical Patents. (2022).
  3. World Patent Database. Patent Family. (2023).
  4. PatSeer. Patent Search and Analysis Tools. (2023).
  5. European Patent Office. Patent Law and Practice. (2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.