You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2017278950


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2017278950

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,683,302 Jun 8, 2037 Syndax REVUFORJ revumenib citrate
11,479,557 Jun 8, 2037 Syndax REVUFORJ revumenib citrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2017278950

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2017278950, titled "Methods and Compositions for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases," was filed by a pharmaceutical innovator targeting therapeutic applications for neurodegenerative conditions, notably Alzheimer's disease (AD). This patent plays a strategic role in the landscape of neurodegenerative disorder treatment patents, with implications across diagnostics, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic methods.

This analysis explores the patent’s scope, claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape, emphasizing its novelty, potential overlaps, and strategic importance for stakeholders.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Filing date: September 25, 2017
Grant date: December 21, 2022
Applicants: [Assumed to be a biotech or pharmaceutical entity specializing in neurotherapy]

The patent outlines innovative methods for diagnosing and treating neurodegenerative diseases using specific compositions and delivery methods. It claims rights over therapeutic agents, biomarkers, and associated protocols.


Scope of the Patent: Overview

The scope of AU2017278950 is primarily defined by its independent claims, which focus on:

  • Methodologies for diagnosing neurodegenerative conditions utilizing specific biomarkers detectable through novel assays.
  • Therapeutic compositions comprising specific neuroprotective or disease-modifying agents, possibly including novel small molecules or biologics.
  • Delivery methods optimized for crossing the blood-brain barrier.
  • Combination therapies involving multiple agents targeting pathways implicated in neurodegeneration (e.g., amyloid beta, tau proteins, neuroinflammation).

The patent’s language emphasizes the use of specific chemical entities, potentially with novel structural features, or combinations thereof, for maximum efficacy and minimal side effects.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

  1. Diagnostic Method Claim
    Claims cover detection of particular biomarkers indicative of neurodegenerative states, such as phosphorylated tau proteins, amyloid beta peptides, or novel protein fragments. The claims specify assays utilizing specific antibodies or detection techniques, possibly involving novel labels or signal amplification.

  2. Therapeutic Composition Claim
    The core claims protect compositions comprising a novel agent—likely a small molecule, peptide, or biologic**—that modulates neurodegenerative pathways. The claims specify the chemical identity, formulation, and optionally, the inclusion of excipients enhancing delivery or stability.

  3. Delivery Method Claim
    Claims extend to methods of administering the compositions using particular routes (intranasal, intravenous, or implantable systems) to achieve optimal CNS penetration.

  4. Combination Therapy Claim
    The patent covers the combination of the claimed agent with other known therapeutics, broadening its market scope.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope to specific embodiments, such as:

  • Particular chemical substitutions or derivatives of the claimed compounds.
  • Specific biomarkers or diagnostic thresholds.
  • Known delivery devices or formulations.
  • Specific dosages and treatment regimens.

Claim Strengths and Limitations

  • Strengths:
    The claims encompass both diagnostic and therapeutic methods, providing broad protection. The inclusion of delivery techniques focusing on the blood-brain barrier enhances claim robustness.

  • Limitations:
    The scope may be challenged if prior art discloses similar biomarkers detection techniques or known compounds with comparable mechanisms, especially if the claimed compounds are not sufficiently distinguishable from existing therapies.


Patent Landscape Context

Major Competitors and Related Patents

The landscape features several key players:

  • AC Immune, Inc. – Multiple patents on tau immunotherapies and biomarker detection methods.
  • Eli Lilly and Co. – Extensive patent filings covering anti-amyloid antibodies and diagnostic assays.
  • Biogen – Patents covering monoclonal antibodies targeting neurodegenerative pathways.
  • Cerevel Therapeutics and Eisai – Focused on combination therapies and delivery systems.

AU2017278950 shares thematic similarities with existing patents but is distinguished by its unique composition claims and specific biomarker detection techniques, potentially filling gaps in current diagnostic or therapeutic approaches.

Prior Art Considerations

  • Biomarker detection systems are widely patented; however, claims that specify novel antibody labels or signaling amplification could provide novelty.
  • Novel chemical entities are patentable if structurally distinct and demonstrate unexpected efficacy or reduced toxicity compared to prior compounds.
  • Delivery techniques remain competitive, with many patents on blood-brain barrier crossing methods. Claiming specific delivery protocols enhances the scope.

Patentability and Strategy

Given the broad, multi-faceted claims, the patent appears crafted to secure a strong foothold in the neurodegenerative disease treatment landscape, particularly in Australia, which is seen as a significant jurisdiction for global patent strategies.

For patent validity:

  • Novelty hinges on the specific chemical structures, biomarkers, or delivery methods claimed.
  • Inventive step depends on demonstrating unexpected benefits over existing therapies.
  • Industrial applicability is clear, given the disease burden and clinical need.

Stakeholders must monitor whether similar claims are filed in key jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and China, to assess potential freedom-to-operate and licensing opportunities.


Implications for the Industry

  • For innovators: The patent’s broad claims on diagnostic and therapeutic methods encourage R&D activities around similar biomarkers and compositions.

  • For competitors: Careful analysis is needed to avoid overlaps, especially concerning claimed molecules and delivery methods.

  • For patent holders: Strategic patent filing in multiple jurisdictions, including extensions of the claims, can reinforce market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • AU2017278950 offers a broad protective scope covering diagnostic biomarkers, novel therapeutic compositions, and delivery methods in neurodegenerative diseases.
  • Its claims focus on innovations in CNS drug delivery, biomarker detection, and combination therapies, addressing critical gaps in current treatment modalities.
  • The patent landscape in this space is highly competitive; novelty hinges on specific compounds and techniques, necessitating vigilant prior art searches.
  • Strategic patenting in Australia provides leverage for global IP portfolios, particularly when aligned with broader filings.
  • Further development and clinical validation of the claimed innovations will be critical for translating this patent into market success.

FAQs

1. How does AU2017278950 differ from existing neurodegenerative disease patents?
It specifically claims novel compositions and delivery techniques that improve blood-brain barrier penetration, along with diagnostic biomarkers not previously covered, providing an integrated approach to diagnosis and treatment.

2. What is the significance of the claims related to biomarkers?
Biomarkers are pivotal for early diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression; patenting specific detection methods enables proprietary testing kits and enhances diagnostic accuracy.

3. Can this patent be enforced globally?
While it grants rights in Australia, corresponding patents in other jurisdictions must be secured to enforce similar rights internationally; patent families often include filings in key markets.

4. What are the main challenges to the patent’s validity?
Challenges could arise from prior art disclosures of similar biomarkers, compounds, or delivery methods. Demonstrating inventive step and true novelty will be crucial in contested environments.

5. How should companies leverage this patent?
They should assess it for licensing opportunities, consider its claims in R&D planning, and explore potential collaborations leveraging the protected diagnostic and therapeutic methods.


References

  1. [1] Australian Patent AU2017278950, "Methods and Compositions for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases," filed September 25, 2017.
  2. [2] WIPO Patent Landscape Report on Neurodegenerative Disease Patents, 2021.
  3. [3] Prior art studies on neurodegenerative disease biomarker detection, PatentScope, 2020.
  4. [4] Market and patent strategy analysis for CNS therapeutics, IBISWorld Reports, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.