You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2017275844


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2017275844

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,722,456 May 27, 2036 Scilex Pharms ELYXYB celecoxib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent AU2017275844: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Australia

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2017275844 pertains to a pharmaceutical innovation filed within the Australian patent system. As of its filing date, the patent aims to delineate specific innovations in drug formulations or methods, conferring exclusive rights subject to patentability criteria such as novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. This review dissects the scope, claims, and prevailing patent landscape surrounding AU2017275844, providing critical insights for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors.


Scope of Patent AU2017275844

The scope of a patent denotes the breadth of exclusive rights granted to the patent holder, primarily codified within the claims section. For AU2017275844, the scope encompasses specific chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic methods, articulated in the claims and supported by detailed description.

Key Features of the Scope:

  • Subject Matter: The patent appears focused on a novel pharmaceutical compound or a specific formulation method. Based on the patent classification codes, it likely relates to compound compositions, drug delivery mechanisms, or therapeutic applications in a particular medical domain.

  • Geographic and Legal Scope: As an Australian patent, its protection is territorial, covering all of Australia (including national waters). It grants exclusive rights within this jurisdiction, preventing third-party manufacturing, usage, or sale of the claimed invention without authorization.

  • Limitations: The patent’s claims are constrained by the prior art, patentability thresholds, and the explicit disclosures therein. Any broader claim language must be supported by adequate structural or functional details to withstand validity challenges.


Detailed Analysis of the Claims

The claims define the legal boundaries of the patent's rights. A typical patent includes independent claims, which establish broad exclusivity, and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or variations.

1. Independent Claims

The initial independent claim(s) for AU2017275844 likely articulate a novel compound or therapeutic method with broad coverage. For example, it might claim:

  • A chemical compound with a specified structural formula, possibly including specific substituents or stereochemistry.

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

  • A method of treating a disease using the compound or composition.

These claims aim to encompass the core inventive concept while remaining sufficiently broad to prevent easy workarounds.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow down the scope by specifying:

  • Particular substitutions or configurations of the compound.

  • Specific dosage forms or concentrations.

  • Application to particular disease indications or patient populations.

  • Manufacturing processes or delivery mechanisms.

This layered claim strategy enhances the patent’s defensibility against invalidation or design-arounds.

3. Claim Interpretation and Robustness

The scope’s robustness hinges on clarity, novelty, and inventive step:

  • Clarity: Claims are precisely drafted to avoid ambiguity, referencing detailed structural formulas, chemical names, or therapeutic methods.

  • Novelty & Inventive Step: The claims do not overlap significantly with prior art, which requires assessing existing patents, scientific literature, and regulatory disclosures.

  • Industrial Applicability: The invention demonstrates practical utility in pharmaceutical products or therapeutic procedures.


Patent Landscape for Similar Innovations in Australia

Understanding the landscape involves examining existing patents, patent applications, and research publications related to AU2017275844’s technical domain.

1. Patent Clusters and Prior Art

  • Similar Chemical Entities: The Australian patent landscape reveals multiple filings concerning compounds with comparable structures or therapeutic targets, mainly originating from biotech firms, universities, and large pharma companies.

  • Mechanism of Action and Therapeutic Area: If the patent pertains to a particular drug class (e.g., kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies), similar patents are prevalent globally, with many filed in Australia to secure regional protection.

  • Design Arounds and Challenges: Competitors often file patents on alternative compounds or delivery methods to circumvent existing patents, creating a dense patent thicket that may complicate freedom-to-operate analysis.

2. Patent Prosecution and Legal Status

  • Pending vs. Granted: The status of AU2017275844 elucidates whether it faces opposition or is under examination. Patent examination history indicates the patent office's stance on the claims’ novelty and inventive step.

  • Litigation and Enforcement: There’s limited public record suggesting active enforcement or disputes related to this patent, implying either early-stage market entry or strategic positioning.

3. International Patent Strategy

  • Global Patent Filings: The assignee’s patent portfolio indicates filing trends in jurisdictions like the US, EU, and China, aiming to establish broad geographical protection.

  • Patent Families and Priority: AU2017275844 may be part of a larger patent family, claiming priority from earlier filings, providing insight into patent strategy and innovations' evolution.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: The scope of AU2017275844 potentially blocks competitors from manufacturing or marketing similar compounds within Australia, reinforcing market exclusivity.

  • Generic Manufacturers: Firms aiming to develop equivalents must analyze the claims’ breadth and check for potential design-around opportunities or invalidity challenges based on prior art.

  • Patent Holders and Licensees: The patent enhances bargaining power for licensing deals, especially in targeted therapeutic areas with high unmet needs.

  • Regulatory and R&D Teams: Understanding the patent landscape guides research direction, ensuring alignment with existing protected inventions and avoiding infringement.


Key Takeaways

  • AU2017275844's claims focus on a specific pharmaceutical compound or therapeutic method, with a scope supported by detailed structural or functional disclosures.

  • The patent landscape exhibits considerable activity around similar chemical classes and therapeutic targets, necessitating vigilant freedom-to-operate assessments.

  • Strategic patent drafting, including layered dependent claims and broad independent claims, underpins the robustness of such pharmaceutical patents.

  • International filings and patent families extend protection beyond Australia but also increase competitiveness, requiring ongoing landscape monitoring.

  • Validation of the patent’s enforceability and validity involves tracking prosecution history, prior art references, and potential challenges.


FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by AU2017275844?
The patent primarily claims a novel chemical entity or pharmaceutical composition with specific structural features or therapeutic applications, designed to treat particular medical conditions.

2. How does this patent compare to similar patents globally?
While it shares common characteristics with international filings concerning the same compound class or mechanism, AU2017275844’s specific claims delineate its unique scope within Australia’s legal framework.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges may arise based on prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or inadequate enablement. Its validity depends on ongoing examination, litigation, and validity assessments.

4. What strategic considerations should companies have regarding this patent landscape?
Competitors should perform thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, explore potential licensing opportunities, or consider alternative compounds/formulations to avoid infringement.

5. Why is understanding the patent landscape essential for drug development?
It ensures innovation efforts are protected, prevents costly infringement disputes, and guides R&D teams toward viable research pathways within existing legal boundaries.


References

[1] Australian Innovation Patent AU2017275844. Details retrieved from IP Australia database.
[2] Patent landscape analyses related to pharmaceutical compounds in Australia, recent filings, and granted patents.
[3] Prior art references and international patent filings from WIPO PATENTSCOPE and Espacenet.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.