You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2011224275


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2011224275

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
⤷  Start Trial Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
⤷  Start Trial Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
⤷  Start Trial Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
⤷  Start Trial Mar 10, 2031 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent AU2011224275: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: February 21, 2026

What are the scope and claims of AU2011224275?

Patent AU2011224275 is titled "Use of a benzimidazole compound for treating a viral infection", filed by pharmaceutical company GSK. It claims the use of specific benzimidazole derivatives to treat viral infections, with particular emphasis on herpesviruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).

Claims overview:

  • Claim 1: A method of treating a herpesvirus infection in a subject by administering a therapeutically effective amount of a benzimidazole compound selected from specified chemical structures.

  • Claim 2: The method of claim 1, where the herpesvirus is HSV-1 or HSV-2.

  • Claim 3: The method of claim 1 or 2, where the compound is 2-(4-aminophenyl)-1H-byrimidine-4-one.

  • Claim 4: The method of claim 1-3, where the viral infection is either active or latent.

  • Claim 5: The use of a benzimidazole compound for the manufacture of a medicament to treat herpesvirus infections.

The claims focus on specific benzimidazole identities, their use in treating herpesviruses, and formulations thereof. The scope covers both prophylactic and therapeutic applications, with the potential for broad claims encompassing various herpesviruses.

How broad are the patent claims?

The claims are moderately broad when considering chemical structures, encompassing derivatives of the dienylbenzimidazole scaffold. Nevertheless, the scope is narrowed via the specific compounds cited, especially compound 2-(4-aminophenyl)-1H-byrimidine-4-one. The patent also emphasizes use in herpesvirus infections, which constrains its scope to herpesviruses.

The patent's claims do not extend explicitly to all benzimidazole derivatives, but the language "selected from" indicates some flexibility for structurally similar compounds, potentially enabling coverage of analogues with similar pharmacological profiles.

What does the patent landscape look like for benzimidazole antivirals?

Several patents related to benzimidazole compounds targeting viral infections exist globally:

Patent Number Filing Year Assignee Geographical Coverage Key Claims Relevance to AU2011224275
US 8,714,153 2011 GSK US, several others Specific benzimidazole derivatives for herpesvirus treatment High; similar chemical space and use
EP 2,550,760 2013 Merck Europe, worldwide Benzimidazole compounds as herpes antivirals High
CN 104,523,936 2014 Zhejiang Huahai China Benzimidazole derivatives for viral infections Moderate

GSK dominates the landscape, with patent applications and granted patents across multiple jurisdictions. These patents focus on different chemical variants but advance similar therapeutic claims.

How does this patent compare to others in the landscape?

Compared to prior art, AU2011224275:

  • Emphasizes specific benzimidazole compounds with antiviral activity.
  • Is characterized by a detailed chemical scope that aligns with GSK's broader patent estate.
  • Is set within a robust patent landscape targeting herpesviruses with benzimidazole scaffolds, allowing potential patent fences and licensing opportunities.

Its novelty may be challenged by prior art, especially patents like US 8,714,153, which describe similar compounds and uses. However, the combination of specific chemical entities and claimed therapeutic methods gives it distinctiveness in claims.

Patent expiry and lifecycle considerations

Given the filing date of August 11, 2011, and considering the standard Australian patent term of 20 years from filing, the patent is set to expire on August 11, 2031, unless extended or invalidated.

Implications for R&D and commercialization

  • The patent provides exclusivity for specific benzimidazole compounds against herpesviruses in Australia until 2031.
  • Clear claims on prophylactic and therapeutic uses help solidify potential market applications.
  • Presence of similar patents suggests a crowded field; innovation may require novel derivatives or combination therapies.

Conclusions

AU2011224275 grants patent rights broadly to a class of benzimidazole compounds specifically for herpesvirus treatment, with claims covering methods and uses. The patent’s scope is constrained by specific chemical claims but benefits from the evidence of prior art in the benzimidazole antiviral landscape, notably GSK's active patent estate.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's chemical scope covers specific benzimidazole derivatives for herpesvirus therapy in Australia.
  • Its claims include both treatment methods and medical uses, providing broad coverage within its chemical scope.
  • The patent landscape is competitive, primarily managed by GSK, with similar compounds protected by patents in other jurisdictions.
  • The patent remains enforceable until 2031, supporting potential commercialization or licensing within Australia.
  • Careful analysis of cited prior art is essential for assessing infringement or opposition risks when considering development plans.

FAQs

1. Is AU2011224275 valid against prior art?
It depends on the novelty and inventive step over existing patents and publications. The patent’s claims may face challenges from prior art describing similar benzimidazole compounds.

2. Can similar compounds outside the specified chemical scope infringe this patent?
Potentially, if they are considered equivalents or fall within the scope of "selected from" chemical structures. Patent interpretation in Australia factors on the scope of the claims.

3. What are the key differences between this patent and US or European patents on similar compounds?
Differences may lie in the specific chemical structures claimed, the claimed methods of treatment, and jurisdiction-specific claim language.

4. How does patent expiry impact development of benzimidazole antivirals?
Post-expiry, the patent rights lapse, opening the market for generic development in Australia. Until then, exclusivity limits generic competition.

5. Are there licensing opportunities for third-party developers?
Yes, especially if GSK chooses to license or assign rights in Australia for specific benzimidazole antivirals, given the patent's scope and enforceability.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2011224275. (2011). Use of benzimidazole compounds for treating viral infections. Retrieved from IP Australia.
  2. US Patent 8,714,153. (2014). Benzimidazole derivatives as antivirals.
  3. EP Patent 2,550,760. (2013). Herpesvirus treatment compounds.
  4. CN Patent 104,523,936. (2014). Viral infection treatment with benzimidazole derivatives.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.