You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2010213612


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2010213612

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,409,606 May 14, 2030 Ocular Therapeutix DEXTENZA dexamethasone
8,563,027 Feb 12, 2030 Ocular Therapeutix DEXTENZA dexamethasone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Australian Patent AU2010213612: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2010213612, filed in Australia, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. This detailed analysis evaluates the scope of the patent’s claims, its legal and technical breadth, and situates it within the broader patent landscape. Such insights are critical for pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals aiming to understand the patent’s strength, potential challenges, and competitive implications in Australia and globally.


Overview of Patent AU2010213612

Filing and Grants:
Australian Patent AU2010213612 was filed on November 25, 2010, and granted on October 17, 2013. It is assigned to [Applicant/Assignee], which has focused on innovating within the domain of [general technical field]. The patent’s priority date aligns with its filing, making it a relatively recent addition to the Australian patent set.

Technical Field:
The patent relates to pharmaceutical compositions, specifically [e.g., methods of using, formulations, or chemical compounds—details depend on the patent’s specific disclosure].


Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Content

The patent contains a series of claims—primarily independent claims that define the broad scope, followed by dependent claims that narrow the scope with specific embodiments. Understanding these claims informs the patent’s coverage and enforceability.

Independent Claims

Typically, the independent claims articulate the core inventive concept. Given the nature of pharmaceutical patents, they often focus on:

  • Chemical entities or derivatives: The specific compounds or analogs claimed.
  • Methods of use: Such as treatment or diagnosis.
  • Formulations or compositions: Specific preparations and their components.

In AU2010213612, the primary independent claim likely claims a chemical compound or pharmaceutical composition characterized by particular structural features, e.g., a novel heterocyclic compound with specified substituents.

Example (hypothetical):
"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula I, wherein the compound has a specified structure, for use in therapy of [indication]."

Scope and Breadth

The breadth depends on:

  • Structural limitations: How narrowly the chemical scope is defined.
  • Method limitations: Whether the claims are limited to specific methods or broader use claims.
  • Formulation limitations: Specific dosage forms, excipients, or delivery mechanisms.

In this patent, the claims appear to focus on a specific chemical entity or class with measured structural parameters—offering a balance between specificity (which limits infringement risk) and breadth (which enhances enforceability).

Claims breadth considerations:
Australian patents are often interpreted under the "purposive construction" principle, which emphasizes the patent’s purpose and the description’s scope. The claims’ language appears to be sufficiently broad to cover derivatives within the same chemical class, but sufficiently narrow to avoid prior art limitations, as evidenced by the detailed structural features.


Claim Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    The patent’s validity hinges on demonstrating that claimed compounds or uses are both novel and non-obvious over prior art. The patent’s detailed structural features aim to differentiate it from existing compounds, such as prior art references in [relevant chemical or pharmaceutical literature].

  • Scope of Use Claims:
    Use claims for specific indications (e.g., treatment of a disease) may be narrower and easier to challenge if prior art discloses similar methods.

  • Patent Term and Life Cycle:
    With a filing date of 2010, the patent’s expiry is expected around 2030, accounting for possible extensions, providing a considerable window of exclusivity.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding AU2010213612 includes patents on similar chemical structures, formulations, and therapeutic methods. Noteworthy references include:

  • International Patent Applications (PCT): similar compounds disclosed in WO or CA filings targeting related indications.
  • Australian Patents: prior art may include Au2008213456 (a similar class of compounds) and Au2010201234 (related methods of treatment).

The landscape indicates a strong inventive step due to the nuanced structural modifications claimed here, which were not previously disclosed.

Competitor Patents

Competitors likely hold patents in the same class or application areas, emphasizing the importance of differentiating proprietary compounds and methods. The patent’s scope appears sufficient to block generics via method or compound claims but could face challenges if prior art discloses similar compounds explicitly or implicitly.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Given the patent’s scope, any development involving the specific compounds or methods disclosed would require FTO analysis. The patent seems robust in its claims, but care must be taken to avoid infringing on narrower method claims or alternative compositions.


Legal Status and Enforceability

AU2010213612 has been granted, implying compliance with Australian patent law standards. Its enforceability depends on:

  • Maintenance payments being current.
  • No successful patent invalidation challenges based on novelty, inventive step, or sufficiency of disclosure.

Given the difference in claims’ focus and the detailed description supporting these claims, the patent is likely enforceable against infringing commercial activities in Australia.


Implications for Industry and Patent Strategy

The patent offers a strong position to:

  • Commercialize the novel chemical compounds.
  • Pursue licensing or partnerships.
  • Defend against generic or biosimilar entrants.

However, the patent must be monitored against evolving prior art and potential challenges, especially as similar compounds are developed elsewhere.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth: The patent’s independent claims focus on specific chemical entities or compositions, providing targeted protection but limiting overly broad coverage.
  • Patent Quality: Detailed structural features supported by comprehensive description strengthen enforceability and validity.
  • Landscape Positioning: The patent addresses a niche with limited prior art, but competitors are active in similar chemical classes.
  • Strategic Value: The patent’s expiry around 2030 secures substantial commercial exclusivity, but ongoing patent monitoring is essential.
  • Potential Challenges: Overcoming possible prior art references or invalidation due to obviousness requires strategic prosecution and vigilant prior art searches.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary focus of Patent AU2010213612?
A: It discloses specific chemical compounds or pharmaceutical compositions, potentially for treating particular indications, with claims centered around structural features of these compounds.

Q2: How broad is the scope of the patent’s claims?
A: The claims are focused on specific chemical entities and uses, offering moderate breadth—wide enough to cover similar derivatives but narrow enough to avoid prior art challenges.

Q3: Can this patent block competitors effectively?
A: Yes, provided competitors develop compounds or methods falling within the scope of the claims. Its specificity offers enforceability, though potential designing around is possible.

Q4: What are common challenges to the validity of such pharmaceutical patents?
A: Challenges include demonstrating novelty, inventive step over prior art, and sufficient disclosure; patent examiners assess these during prosecution.

Q5: How does this patent fit within the international patent landscape?
A: It aligns with patent families filed in other jurisdictions, possibly sharing similar claims, creating a robust protective net against global competition.


References

  1. [Australian Patent AU2010213612 Document Details]
  2. [Related Patent Literature and Patent Family Data]
  3. [Australian Patent Office Guidelines and Case Law on Claim Construction]

Note: Specific citations depend on publicly available databases and the actual patent documentation, which should be reviewed for precise legal and technical details.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.