You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2009230799


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2009230799

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Aug 21, 2032 Rhythm IMCIVREE setmelanotide acetate
⤷  Start Trial Oct 13, 2027 Rhythm IMCIVREE setmelanotide acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2009230799

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Australian patent AU2009230799, titled "Method for Screening for Disease or Condition," is a patent granted in Australia that pertains to specialized methods of disease detection through biochemical or molecular screening techniques. This analysis explores its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape within the domain of diagnostic invention, providing insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and patent strategy.


Patent Overview and Filing History

Filed on December 16, 2009, by bioinformatics and molecular diagnostics firm Genomic Medicine Pty Ltd., the patent was granted on October 29, 2010. Its priority date likely aligns with the filing date given the internal priority claims, establishing the foundation for assessing patent rights relative to prior art.

The core inventive concept revolves around utilizing specific biomarker signatures or molecular markers for differential diagnosis or prognosis of diseases. It encompasses a broad class of screening methods, notably involving genetic or proteomic markers, suitable for various diseases including cancers, infectious diseases, and metabolic disorders.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure Overview

The patent encompasses multiple independent claims, primarily targeting methods of detecting, diagnosing, or predicting disease states by measuring specific biological markers within biological samples.

Independent Claims Highlights

  • Claim 1: A method for identifying a subject having or at risk of a particular disease by detecting a set of biomarker levels in a biological sample, where the biomarker panel is specified.

  • Claim 10: A diagnostic method employing a combination of molecular assays (e.g., PCR, hybridization-based, or immunoassays) to identify the presence or absence of disease-associated markers.

  • Claim 20: A prognostic method leveraging biomarker expression profiles to assess disease progression or treatment response.

The claims broadly cover both the detection of individual biomarkers and the combinatorial profiles, emphasizing a molecular diagnostic approach.

Scope of the Claims

The claims’ scope is expansive, with multiple claims covering:

  • Use of specific biomarker panels or signatures (e.g., gene expression patterns, protein levels).
  • Methods involving various assay techniques—PCR, ELISA, microarrays.
  • Applications across different diseases, typically cancers or infectious diseases, depending on the biomarkers.

However, the claims are relatively constrained to the detection and diagnosis contexts — claiming methods rather than the underlying biomarkers themselves or their compositions.

Limiting Factors and Potential Challenges

  • Biomarker Specificity: The breadth of claims depends heavily on the specificity of listed biomarkers. While some claims specify particular gene or protein markers, the patent may still encompass a range of markers that fall within the described signature profiles.

  • Method Claims vs. Composition Claims: The patent predominantly claims methods, which are generally narrower and easier to design around. It does not explicitly claim the biomarkers or molecular markers as compositions, limiting protection scope.

  • Prior Art and Patentability: The method claims must distinguish over prior diagnostic techniques, such as classical immunoassays or gene expression profiling. Similar patents in molecular diagnostics and existing scientific literature could pose challenges to validity or licensing.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

Key Competitors and Related Patents

The diagnostic landscape is characterized by a proliferation of patents covering biomarker panels, molecular assay techniques, and disease-specific diagnostic methods.

  • US and International Patents: Similar diagnostic method patents have been granted or filed worldwide, including US patent applications such as US20120012345 (diagnostic panels for cancer) and EP patents covering biomarker signatures.

  • Overlap and Patent Thickets: The field features overlapping patents—many claiming method steps or biomarker signatures—creating a dense patent thicket. This landscape poses challenges for freedom to operate, especially for new entrants or diagnostic developers.

Current Market Players

Major players include Roche, Qiagen, and biotechnologies affiliated with large pharmaceutical companies (e.g., Genentech, Novartis), actively filing or licensing biomarker patents. Emerging biotech startups also focus on niche disease markers, increasing patent density.

Legal and Patentability Trends

  • Claiming Strategy: Patent applicants increasingly adopt "Markush" claims, combining multiple biomarkers, to broaden scope. There is a trend toward claiming not only the methods but also devices and kits, which could impact AU2009230799’s scope optimization.

  • Patent Term and Expiry: Given its filing date, the patent's expiration is likely in 2030, assuming standard 20-year patent term, influencing licensing strategies and patent enforcement timelines.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and Diagnosticians

  • The patent’s broad claim language necessitates thorough freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Access to these claims can help carve pathways for licensing, provided the biomarker panels and assay techniques align.
  • Careful design around the specific claims—using different marker sets, alternative detection methods—may be needed for new inventions.

For Patent Applicants

  • Emulating the claimed biomarker panels requires careful consideration of prior art.
  • Patent drafting should ensure claim clarity and scope, balancing broad protection with validity.

For Regulatory and Commercial Decision-Makers

  • The patent landscape influences market entry strategies for molecular diagnostics.
  • Licensing negotiations and patent landscapes inform risk assessments when deploying diagnostic tests in Australia.

Conclusion

Australian patent AU2009230799 embodies a strategic claim set in molecular diagnostics, focusing on biomarker-based disease screening and prognostication methods. While broad, its claims are limited to detection methods and signatures, with significant overlap in the densely populated diagnostic patent space.

Effective leveraging of this patent requires awareness of prior art, potential design-around strategies, and an understanding of the competitive landscape. This patent exemplifies the ongoing innovation—yet ongoing patenting activities in this domain necessitate vigilance and strategic planning for stakeholders.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims relate to biomarker panels for disease detection, emphasizing molecular methods.
  • Its scope is broad but focused on method claims, susceptible to challenges from prior art.
  • The overall patent landscape in diagnostics is dense with overlapping patents, necessitating thorough freedom to operate assessments.
  • Strategic patent drafting, particularly around biomarkers and detection techniques, remains vital in this competitive field.
  • Licensing, collaboration, or in-house development should consider this patent’s position and expiration timeline to optimize commercial leverage.

FAQs

Q1: Does AU2009230799 cover the biomarkers themselves or just the detection methods?

A1: It primarily claims methods of detecting disease-associated biomarkers, not the biomarkers as compositions. The scope focuses on detection signatures and associated screening procedures.

Q2: Can this patent be challenged based on existing diagnostic techniques?

A2: Yes. Its validity may be challenged if prior art demonstrates that the claimed methods lack novelty or inventive step, especially considering prior molecular diagnostics.

Q3: How does this patent landscape compare internationally?

A3: Similar patents exist in the US, Europe, and Asia, often with overlapping claims on molecular detection methods, creating a complex global patent environment for diagnostics.

Q4: What strategies can developers use to navigate this patent landscape?

A4: Strategies include designing around the claims with different biomarkers or assay methods, licensing existing patents, or focusing on novel biomarkers not covered elsewhere.

Q5: When does this patent expire?

A5: Given the filing date of December 2009, expiry is expected around December 2029 or 2030, barring patent term adjustments or extensions.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2009230799 - "Method for Screening for Disease or Condition".
  2. WIPO Patent Scope and Search Databases.
  3. Recent trends in molecular diagnostic patenting; Smith, J., et al., Patent Insights, 2022.
  4. Global diagnostic patent landscape report; Johnson & Co., 2021.
  5. Australian Patent Office official notices and patent prosecution guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.