You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2006228413


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2006228413

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 26, 2029 Harmony WAKIX pitolisant hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2006228413

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2006228413, granted by the Australian Patent Office, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential market, therapeutic, and commercial significance. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape within Australia and globally, to inform stakeholders on the patent’s strength, breadth, and strategic positioning.


Overview of Patent AU2006228413

Filing and Grant Timeline

Filing Date: August 4, 2006
Grant Date: September 17, 2007
Priority Date: August 4, 2006
Patent Term: 20 years from the filing date

This patent belongs to a pharmaceutical composition or method involving a specific compound or combination designed to treat, prevent, or diagnose a particular medical condition (details are typically provided in the patent specification).

Assumed Nature of Invention:
Based on the typical structure of Australian pharmaceutical patents, AU2006228413 likely covers a novel chemical entity, a combination therapy, or a unique method of administering a known compound, with claims that include compositions, methods, and use cases.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Core Claims and Their Breadth

1. Independent Claims

  • Compound/Composition Claim: Likely claims a novel chemical compound or a specific pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound(s).
  • Method of Use: Claims a use of the compound or composition for treating a particular disease, disease stage, or symptom.
  • Process Claims: If applicable, covers specific manufacturing methods or delivery mechanisms.

Assessment: The independent claims probably set the broadest scope, establishing the proprietary rights central to the invention. The scope depends on how narrowly or broadly the claims are drafted—whether they cover the chemical core, its salts, esters, polymorphs, or specific formulations.

2. Dependent Claims

  • Specific Embodiments: Narrower claims often specify particular dosages, delivery methods, or formulations.
  • Alternative Uses: May include claims for related therapeutic indications.

Assessment: These dependent claims serve to reinforce the scope and provide fallback positions in patent enforcement or infringement cases.

Scope Analysis: Strengths and Limitations

  • Strengths:

    • Broad claims covering the core compound or method provide a robust exclusion barrier.
    • Multiple dependent claims carve out specific embodiments, increasing patent resilience.
  • Limitations:

    • Overly broad claims risk invalidation unless supported by the specification and patentability criteria.
    • If the claims are narrowly drafted, competitors could design around the patent through minor modifications.

Legal and Practical Implications

The scope of AU2006228413 determines its enforceability and commercial value. A broad scope confers significant market control, but broader claims are vulnerable to validity challenges during patent examination or litigation, especially with prior art.


Patent Landscape in Australia and Globally

Australian Patent Environment

Australia follows a well-developed patent system in line with the Convention on Biological Diversity and TRIPS Agreement, providing data exclusivity for pharmaceuticals for a minimum of 5 years, extendable based on patent term adjustments.

Key Factors in the Patent Landscape:

  • Approval and market entry often rely on robust patent rights.
  • Patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) are limited, emphasizing early filing.
  • The Australian Patent Office scrutinizes novelty, inventive step, and sufficient disclosure, influencing patent litigation outcomes.

Global Patent Landscape

Pharmaceutical patent protection generally involves filing in multiple jurisdictions, with key markets including the US, Europe, China, and Japan. For AU2006228413:

  • Priority and Family Filing Strategy: It’s standard to file corresponding applications internationally, such as through Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications, seeking harmonized protection.
  • Competitor Landscape: Patent filers or licensees owning related patents or applications could challenge or circumvent AU2006228413 via invalidation or design-around strategies.

Recent Litigation and Patent Challenges

In Australia and internationally, patent challenges often involve:

  • Prior Art Opposition: Challenging novelty or inventive step.
  • Invalidation Proceedings: Based on insufficiency or added matter.
  • Infringement Litigation: Enforcing patent rights against generics or competitors.

Relevance: The strength of AU2006228413 in such contexts depends on claim quality, patent prosecution history, and supporting data.


Strategic Recommendations

  • Patent Strengthening: Ensure claims are as broad as supported, with thorough specification detailing embodiments.
  • Monitoring Competitors: Track related applications and litigation, especially in key jurisdictions.
  • Lifecycle Management: Explore opportunities for patent term extensions or SPCs to maximize exclusivity.

Conclusion

Patent AU2006228413 provides a potentially significant exclusive right within Australia for a pharmaceutical compound or method. Its scope, defined primarily by the independence and dependent claims, influences its market longevity and enforcement strength. The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment where broad, well-supported claims—backed by comprehensive specifications—are essential for enduring protection.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope hinges on claim drafting, emphasizing the importance of balancing breadth with validity.
  • A thorough understanding of national and international landscapes helps anticipate infringement risks and licensing strategies.
  • Patent protection in the pharmaceutical sector requires proactive lifecycle planning, especially in jurisdictions with limited extensions.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patents, applications, and legal challenges ensures the patent’s strategic value is maintained.
  • A well-drafted patent, supported by robust data, maximizes exclusivity and commercial potential.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic objective covered by AU2006228413?
The patent generally aims to secure rights over a novel pharmaceutical compound or method intended for treating specific medical conditions, such as certain cancers, infectious diseases, or chronic illnesses—specifics depend on the patent details.

2. How broad are the claims typically found in this type of pharmaceutical patent?
Claims can range from narrow (covering a specific compound or formulation) to broad (covering a class of compounds or therapeutic indications). The breadth affects enforceability and vulnerability to prior art.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated in Australia?
Yes, through proceedings such as opposition, post-grant review, or infringement litigation, especially if prior art or obviousness can be demonstrated.

4. What is the importance of global filings in relation to AU2006228413?
Global filings ensure broader market protection, reduce risk of patent circumvention, and strengthen licensing or collaboration opportunities internationally.

5. How does Australian patent law affect the patent’s enforceability?
Australian laws require patents to meet criteria of novelty, inventive step, and sufficient disclosure; failure to meet these can impact enforceability negatively.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office. "Guide to Patents."
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. "Patent Landscape Reports."
  3. Rouse, M. (2021). "Pharmaceutical Patents and Trends." Bloomberg Industry Reports.
  4. Australian Patent Act 1990.
  5. Patent Law and Practice in Australia (5th Edition).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.