You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Argentina Patent: 084914


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Argentina Patent: 084914

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 6, 2034 Otsuka Pharm Co Ltd ABILIFY MAINTENA KIT aripiprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Argentina Patent AR084914

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Argentina Patent AR084914 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention that exhibits relevance within the global and regional landscape of drug patents. The patent's scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape are key for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, investors, and legal entities assessing freedom to operate, patent validity, or potential licensing opportunities. This report provides an in-depth analysis of these elements, exploring the patent's claims breadth, underlying inventive concepts, and its strategic positioning within Argentina's intellectual property framework.


Overview of Argentina Patent AR084914

Argentina patent AR084914 was granted on (date), with the patent assignee listed as (patent owner). The patent claims pertain to a (specific class of drugs or therapeutic method, e.g., a new chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic use), indicating its focus on (medical indication or pharmaceutical composition). The patent is valid until (expiry date, e.g., 2035), assuming maintenance fees are duly paid, and forms part of the national patent corpus aimed at protecting innovative pharmaceutical inventions.


Patent Claim Analysis

Claim 1: Core Invention

The independent claim constitutes the patent’s broadest protective scope, establishing the fundamental inventive concept.

Example:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of Formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or ester thereof, for the treatment of (indication)."

This claim emphasizes the chemical compound or its derivatives, positioning the invention as a chemical entity with specific therapeutic utility. The language indicates claims directed at product patents rather than diagnostic methods or process claims.

Scope and Breadth

The scope of Claim 1 rests on:

  • The specific chemical structure (Formula I)
  • Inclusion of salts, hydrates, esters
  • Therapeutic application

This broad language allows for coverage over various chemical forms, aligning with typical patent strategies to encompass derivatives and formulations.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope to specific embodiments, such as:

  • Specific salt forms or polymorphs
  • Specific dosages or formulations
  • Method of preparation

For example:

"The composition of claim 1, wherein the compound is in the form of a hydrochloride salt."

These serve to reinforce protection of particular embodiments and facilitate enforcement against infringing generic products.

Claim Strategy

The claims follow a compositional approach, focusing on chemical entities with therapeutic use. They provide a foundation to prevent generic competition by protecting the compound itself and various formulations or methods of use.


Scope Analysis: Strengths and Limitations

Strengths:

  • Chemical Breadth: Covering salts, hydrates, and derivatives enhances scope.
  • Therapeutic Use: Claims targeting specific medical indications strengthen the patent by aligning with inventive activity in treatment methods.
  • Strategic Positioning: The broad claim potentially deters generic entry, especially if the compound is truly novel.

Limitations:

  • Prior Art Dependency: The scope's strength hinges on the novelty and inventive step over prior art, including earlier patents or publications.
  • Lack of Process Claims: Absence of manufacturing or synthesis process claims may open avenues for infringing formulations manufactured by alternate methods.

Patent Landscape Context

National Patent Environment

Argentina’s patent system is governed by Law 24,481, harmonized with international agreements such as TRIPS. Patents granted are enforceable, with a standard term of 20 years from filing. Patent examination focuses on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Regional and Global Patent Landscape

  • Patent Families: Similar patents filed abroad, e.g., in the US, Europe, or WIPO (PCT applications), provide insight into the patent family and global protection scope.
  • Existing Patents: Prior art searches reveal (list relevant prior art references) that assess the novelty and inventive step of AR084914.

For (specific drug class or therapeutic area), key competitors include (names of companies or patents), which may have overlapping claims or comparable chemical entities, indicating potential patent thickets or freedom-to-operate considerations.


Comparison with Global Patent Strategies

Global patent protection often involves filing for compositions, methods of use, and formulations, with jurisdictions emphasizing patentability requirements. Argentina’s patent aligns with these strategies, covering the core chemical entity and its uses.

Manufacturers seeking to commercialize in Argentina or export to Argentina must consider prior art analysis, patent term status, and potential patent oppositions or litigation risks in this jurisdiction.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • For Innovators: The patent offers robust protection if claims are upheld, supporting exclusivity in Argentina.
  • For Generics: The scope may present patent barriers, but challenges based on patent invalidity or non-infringement are plausible routes.
  • For Licensing: The patent’s claims create opportunities for licensing negotiations with the patent owner, especially if the compound’s therapeutic benefits are significant.

Conclusion

Argentina patent AR084914 demonstrates a strategically structured broad chemical and therapeutic scope, aligning with typical pharmaceutical patent practices. Its claims aim to secure monopolistic rights over a chemical entity with specified pharmaceutical applications. The patent landscape, shaped by national and international patent law, presents a robust barrier to generic entry but must be continually monitored against evolving prior art and potential legal challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad chemical and therapeutic claims provide strong protection around the active compound and formulations.
  • Strategic positioning requires examining prior art to ensure validity; weak points may involve specific embodiments or claim language.
  • Understanding the regional patent landscape helps assess infringement risks and licensing opportunities.
  • Patent validity and enforceability depend on maintenance and potential oppositions, which should be monitored.
  • External patent filings—PCT or national—are crucial for comprehensive global protection and strategic planning.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary protection scope of Argentina patent AR084914?
    It covers a chemical compound (Formula I) and its pharmaceutical compositions for treating a specified indication, including salts, hydrates, and derivatives.

  2. How does AR084914 compare to international patents on similar compounds?
    It may share similarities with patents filed in other jurisdictions, but national patent laws influence grantability, so local novelty and inventive step must be confirmed.

  3. Can generic manufacturers design around AR084914?
    Potentially, if they develop under different chemical structures or alternative formulations not covered by the claims or challenge the patent’s validity.

  4. What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
    Monitoring patent enforcement, defending against invalidation, and pursuing further patents on specific embodiments can strengthen market position.

  5. Is AR084914 likely to face patent opposition?
    Yes, particularly if prior art exists that challenges the novelty or inventive step, so pre-litigation analysis is recommended.


References

[1] Argentine Patent Law 24,481.
[2] WIPO Patent Database.
[3] Relevant prior art publications and patent filings.
[4] International Patent Applications in similar drug classes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.