Last Updated: May 11, 2026

HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride and what is the scope of patent protection?

Hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Chartwell Rx, Glenmark Pharms, Heritage, Teva, and Ucb Inc, and is included in five NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE
US Patents:0
Tradenames:2
Applicants:5
NDAs:5
Clinical Trials: 3
DailyMed Link:HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Teva Pharmaceuticals USAPhase 1
Paddock Laboratories, Inc.Phase 1

See all HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE clinical trials

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
UNIRETIC Tablets hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride 7.5mg/12.5mg, 15 mg/25 mg and 15 mg/12.5 mg 020729 1 2004-01-15

US Patents and Regulatory Information for HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Chartwell Rx MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 090096-003 Sep 25, 2008 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Heritage MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 202150-001 Mar 7, 2014 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Chartwell Rx MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 090096-002 Sep 25, 2008 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Heritage MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 202150-002 Mar 7, 2014 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Teva MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 076980-001 Mar 7, 2007 RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; MOEXIPRIL HYDROCHLORIDE

Market dynamics and financial trajectory for hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride

Last updated: April 25, 2026

Hydrochlorothiazide plus moexipril hydrochloride is an established, off-patent combination used for hypertension. The market dynamics are shaped by (1) generic penetration, (2) price compression across major geographies, (3) payer-driven formulary decisions for low-cost antihypertensive bundles, and (4) limited patent-led exclusivity tailwinds due to the long product life cycle.

How big is the global opportunity and where does it concentrate?

The combination sits in the core antihypertensive class mix where demand is steady and volume-led rather than innovation-led. In practice, its revenue profile tracks broader hypertension treatment patterns: persistent treatment rates in primary care and substitution to the lowest cost alternatives under formulary and interchange policies.

Typical market structure for this product type

  • Primary demand driver: chronic hypertension medication adherence and prescriber preference for combination pills.
  • Supply driver: high number of authorized generics and branded-to-generic switches in many markets.
  • Revenue pattern: declining net price over time, with revenue stabilized by ongoing volumes in older treatment regimens.

What pricing and payer dynamics determine revenue?

This combination competes in a segment where payers actively steer costs.

Net price compression forces

  • Generic competition: multi-manufacturer supply reduces branded pricing power.
  • Therapeutic interchange: hydrochlorothiazide-based diuretic combinations are often treated as substitutable within classes and across prescriber options.
  • Formulary tiers: low-cost generics typically land on preferred tiers, limiting the pricing premium available to brands.

Payer reimbursement and utilization

  • Chronic use: stable scripts but not immune to periodic guideline shifts, step-therapy rules, and switching to alternate RAAS inhibitor plus thiazide pairings.
  • Health technology assessment (HTA): decisions tend to focus on cost per treated patient, favoring lower-cost entrants in mature markets.

What competitive landscape pressures matter most?

For mature antihypertensive combinations, the competitive set usually includes:

  • Other ACE inhibitor plus thiazide fixed-dose combinations (same functional class coverage).
  • Dual-therapy as separate products (ACE inhibitor plus diuretic dispensed separately), enabling payer swaps and pharmacy substitution.
  • Broader first-line antihypertensive coverage that can displace patients over time, such as ARB-based combinations, depending on country-specific prescribing norms.

Practical outcome: commercial performance is usually governed by which supplier has the lowest net price in the relevant formulary context, not by differentiated clinical performance.

What is the financial trajectory across the product life cycle?

Hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride follows the standard trajectory of mature, off-exclusivity hypertension assets.

Expected phases

  1. Initial branded adoption (historical): brand establishment with higher net pricing.
  2. Generic entry and brand erosion: revenue decline driven by substitution and authorized generic competition.
  3. Maturity (current): volume stability with continued margin pressure from price erosion.
  4. Late-life stabilization: revenue can flatten if supply and pricing stabilize, but growth is structurally limited without new exclusivity.

What “financial trajectory” usually looks like for this category

  • Revenue: generally stable-to-declining, with periodic small uplifts when a supplier gains formulary position or when conversion from separate therapy to fixed-dose combinations is promoted.
  • Margins: compress as wholesalers and payers renegotiate rebates and as manufacturers compete in tender or national account contracts.
  • Cash flow: tends to be steadier than innovation drugs because demand is chronic, but earnings volatility rises with pricing cuts.

Is there any patent-driven growth or exclusivity tailwind?

For this combination, there is no visible patent-led growth driver that would materially change the revenue trajectory in most large markets by now, given typical timelines for ACE inhibitor and thiazide combination products in commercial practice.

Implication for investors/operators: the business case is likely rooted in (1) procurement and pricing execution, (2) manufacturing scale and cost position, and (3) formulary penetration in key reimbursement systems, rather than new product launches.

How do regulatory and supply factors affect market behavior?

In mature generic-heavy markets, performance hinges on supply continuity and regulatory status.

Common operational dynamics

  • ANDA/MAA lifecycle management: maintaining approved labels and bioequivalence packages to preserve supply eligibility.
  • Manufacturing consistency: compliance stability matters because shortages or plant disruptions can trigger temporary distribution shifts and pricing spikes, followed by normalization.
  • Label and dosing synchronization: fixed-dose products can lose share if alternate strengths or dosing schedules better match prescriber behavior.

What market structure influences revenue variability?

Hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride market variability usually comes from procurement cycles and payer revisions.

Key variability vectors

  • National formulary updates: change the preferred supplier or tier placement.
  • Tender procurement: can cause sudden price resets when a contract changes hands.
  • Wholesale channel dynamics: inventory swings influence near-term net sales reporting.
  • Parallel trade and cross-border arbitrage (where applicable): can distort local pricing.

What does this mean for commercial strategy and investment positioning?

For off-patent antihypertensive combinations, the investment thesis is typically about cost-to-serve and channel control.

Commercial strategy levers

  • Win and defend preferred formulary placement: maximize repeat prescriptions and reduce payer-driven substitution.
  • Tender execution: price and service reliability beat marketing differentiation.
  • Cost position: manufacturing scale and supply chain resilience determine margin durability.

Investment lens

  • Treat as a “volume plus margin” asset: expect growth to be constrained by demand maturity and competitive price pressure.
  • Benchmark against pricing indices in generics: the asset’s financial performance tracks broader low-cost antihypertensive pricing trends more than company-specific pipeline progress.

Key takeaways

  • Hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride is a mature hypertension combination where generic penetration and payer-driven substitution dominate revenue outcomes.
  • The financial trajectory is typically stable-to-declining revenue with continued net price compression, unless a supplier gains formulary or tender advantages.
  • Commercial upside is primarily execution-based: procurement, cost leadership, and formulary positioning, not new exclusivity.

FAQs

1) Is hydrochlorothiazide; moexipril hydrochloride still a growth market?

It is generally a mature, volume-led market with limited innovation-led growth. Revenue changes usually come from formulary and pricing shifts rather than new patient uptake.

2) What drives market share for this combination?

Share depends on net price, preferred payer placement, and supply reliability in tender or national contract environments.

3) How does generic entry affect financial performance?

Generic competition drives net price compression and can reduce branded revenue rapidly after substitution. For manufacturers, margin durability depends on cost position.

4) Do prescribers prefer fixed-dose combinations or separate dosing?

It varies by payer and clinical practice. Fixed-dose can win share when it improves adherence and simplifies prescribing, but substitution to separate therapies often occurs when payers seek lower-cost regimens.

5) What are the main risks to earnings?

The primary risks are continued price erosion, tender contract losses, and supply interruptions that can shift volume and pricing dynamics.


References

No sources were provided in the prompt, and no verified market or financial datasets with citations can be produced from the available information in this response.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.