You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

FOSCARNET SODIUM - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for FOSCARNET SODIUM
US Patents:0
Tradenames:2
Applicants:7
NDAs:7
Drug Master File Entries: 7
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 8
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 69
Clinical Trials: 25
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in FOSCARNET SODIUM?FOSCARNET SODIUM excipients list
DailyMed Link:FOSCARNET SODIUM at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for FOSCARNET SODIUM

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
RenJi HospitalPHASE4
The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityPHASE4
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityPHASE4

See all FOSCARNET SODIUM clinical trials

Pharmacology for FOSCARNET SODIUM
Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) Categories for FOSCARNET SODIUM

US Patents and Regulatory Information for FOSCARNET SODIUM

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Clinigen Hlthcare FOSCAVIR foscarnet sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 020068-001 Sep 27, 1991 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Amneal FOSCARNET SODIUM foscarnet sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 216602-001 Mar 1, 2024 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Clinigen Hlthcare FOSCAVIR foscarnet sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 020068-002 Sep 27, 1991 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Gland FOSCARNET SODIUM foscarnet sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 213001-001 Apr 21, 2021 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hospira FOSCARNET SODIUM foscarnet sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 077174-002 May 31, 2005 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for FOSCARNET SODIUM

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Clinigen Hlthcare FOSCAVIR foscarnet sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 020068-001 Sep 27, 1991 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Clinigen Hlthcare FOSCAVIR foscarnet sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 020068-001 Sep 27, 1991 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Clinigen Hlthcare FOSCAVIR foscarnet sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 020068-001 Sep 27, 1991 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Clinigen Hlthcare FOSCAVIR foscarnet sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 020068-001 Sep 27, 1991 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

FOSCARNET SODIUM: Patent Landscape and Market Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Foscarnet sodium, an antiviral medication, faces a mature market with significant patent expirations. Generic competition has stabilized pricing, and R&D focus has shifted to newer antiviral agents with improved profiles. The market trajectory for foscarnet sodium is projected to be largely flat, with demand sustained by its established efficacy in specific indications and its availability as a cost-effective treatment option.

What is the Current Patent Status of Foscarnet Sodium?

The primary patents protecting the original formulation and methods of use for foscarnet sodium have expired. Foscarnet sodium was first patented in the United States by AstraZeneca. Key patents, such as those covering its therapeutic use for cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections, have long since lapsed.

  • Original Formulation Patents: These patents expired in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
  • Method of Use Patents: Patents related to specific treatment regimens and dosages for conditions like CMV retinitis have also expired.
  • Generic Approvals: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved multiple generic versions of foscarnet sodium, indicating the absence of active market exclusivity from originator patents. For example, Teva Pharmaceuticals and Mylan N.V. (now Viatris) have received Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) for their respective foscarnet sodium products.

While the core patents have expired, there is potential for secondary patents related to novel formulations, manufacturing processes, or combination therapies. However, these are less likely to provide broad market exclusivity against established generic competition. Analysis of patent databases such as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the European Patent Office (EPO) reveals no recent blockbuster patents that would significantly alter the competitive landscape for the drug's established indications.

How has Patent Expiration Impacted Foscarnet Sodium's Market Dynamics?

The expiration of key patents has led to significant market changes for foscarnet sodium, primarily characterized by increased generic competition and subsequent price erosion.

  • Generic Entry and Price Competition: The entry of multiple generic manufacturers after patent expiry led to a substantial decrease in the average selling price of foscarnet sodium. This competition has driven down prices for both healthcare providers and patients, making the drug more accessible.
  • Market Share Shift: The originator's market share has diminished considerably, with generic versions now dominating the market. This is a typical pattern observed for pharmaceutical products following patent expiration.
  • Supply Chain Consolidation: As profitability margins have compressed due to price competition, the market has seen consolidation among generic manufacturers. This can lead to fewer but larger players controlling the supply.
  • Cost-Effectiveness as a Driver: In healthcare systems, foscarnet sodium's affordability has maintained its relevance, particularly in regions or institutions prioritizing cost containment. Its established efficacy for specific viral infections, especially in immunocompromised patients, ensures continued demand despite newer alternatives.
  • Limited R&D Investment: The lack of patent protection and the resulting price pressure have disincentivized significant new R&D investment in foscarnet sodium by originator companies. Investment has largely shifted to newer antiviral agents with novel mechanisms of action, improved safety profiles, or broader spectrums of activity.

What are the Current Therapeutic Indications and Patient Populations for Foscarnet Sodium?

Foscarnet sodium is primarily indicated for the treatment of specific viral infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. Its use has been established over decades, making it a recognized treatment option.

  • Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis: This is a primary indication, especially in patients with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Foscarnet sodium was a cornerstone treatment before the advent of more potent oral antivirals. It is typically administered intravenously.
  • Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Infections: Foscarnet sodium is used for the treatment of acyclovir-resistant HSV infections, including mucocutaneous HSV in immunocompromised patients.
  • Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV) Infections: It is also indicated for the treatment of VZV infections in immunocompromised patients, particularly when other treatments have failed or are contraindicated.

The patient population for foscarnet sodium largely consists of:

  • Immunocompromised Individuals: This includes patients with HIV/AIDS, organ transplant recipients, and those undergoing chemotherapy, who are at higher risk of severe viral infections.
  • Patients with Acyclovir-Resistant Viral Infections: Foscarnet sodium provides an alternative when common antiviral drugs are ineffective.

While newer drugs, such as ganciclovir and valganciclovir, have become first-line treatments for CMV in many settings due to better tolerability and oral administration, foscarnet sodium retains its place for specific resistant cases or when other agents are contraindicated.

What is the Projected Financial Trajectory and Market Size for Foscarnet Sodium?

The market for foscarnet sodium is characterized by its maturity and the significant impact of generic competition, leading to a stable but largely unexpanding financial trajectory.

  • Market Size: The global market for foscarnet sodium is estimated to be in the tens of millions of U.S. dollars annually. Precise figures are difficult to ascertain due to the fragmented generic market and varying pricing across regions. However, it is a niche market compared to blockbuster antiviral drugs.
  • Price Trends: Prices have stabilized following the initial sharp decline post-patent expiry. The current pricing is driven by manufacturing costs, competition among generic suppliers, and reimbursement policies. Price increases are unlikely to be substantial due to the availability of generics and alternative therapies.
  • Demand Drivers: Demand is sustained by its established role in treating specific viral infections, particularly in immunocompromised patient populations. The ongoing prevalence of HIV/AIDS in certain regions and the use of immunosuppressive therapies in transplant patients will continue to support demand.
  • Competitive Landscape: The market is highly competitive with numerous generic manufacturers. This intense competition caps revenue potential and limits opportunities for significant market growth.
  • Emerging Alternatives: The development of newer antiviral agents with broader spectrums, improved oral bioavailability, and better safety profiles poses a long-term threat to foscarnet sodium's market share, even in its niche indications. Drugs like letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in transplant patients represent a shift in treatment paradigms.
  • Geographic Variations: Market size and growth may vary by region, influenced by healthcare access, prevalence of target diseases, and local pricing regulations. Developed markets may see slower growth or a decline, while some developing markets might maintain stable demand due to cost considerations.

Overall, the financial trajectory for foscarnet sodium is one of stability rather than growth. The market is unlikely to experience significant expansion due to patent expirations, intense generic competition, and the availability of superior alternative treatments.

What are the Key Manufacturing and Regulatory Considerations for Foscarnet Sodium?

The manufacturing and regulatory landscape for foscarnet sodium is well-established, reflecting its long history in the market. However, compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) remains critical for all manufacturers.

  • Manufacturing Processes: The synthesis of foscarnet sodium involves standard chemical processes. Manufacturers must adhere to strict quality control measures to ensure the purity, potency, and stability of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and the finished drug product.
  • API Sourcing: The sourcing of foscarnet sodium API is a key consideration. Manufacturers may produce API in-house or rely on third-party suppliers, often located in regions with established chemical manufacturing capabilities, such as India and China. Supply chain robustness and quality assurance of API suppliers are paramount.
  • Formulation: Foscarnet sodium is typically supplied as a solution for intravenous infusion. Ensuring the sterility and stability of the liquid formulation requires specialized manufacturing facilities and rigorous testing.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Generic manufacturers must obtain marketing authorization from regulatory bodies such as the FDA in the U.S. and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Europe. This involves submitting an ANDA or equivalent, demonstrating bioequivalence to the reference listed drug, and meeting all quality and safety standards.
  • Post-Market Surveillance: Like all pharmaceuticals, foscarnet sodium products are subject to post-market surveillance to monitor for adverse events and ensure continued product quality and safety.
  • Environmental Regulations: Manufacturing processes must comply with environmental regulations related to waste disposal and emissions, a standard requirement for all chemical manufacturing.

The mature nature of the drug means that manufacturing processes are largely optimized. The focus for manufacturers is on cost-efficient production while maintaining stringent quality and regulatory compliance to compete effectively in the generic market.

What is the Competitive Landscape for Foscarnet Sodium?

The competitive landscape for foscarnet sodium is characterized by a high degree of generic saturation and a limited number of active originator players.

  • Generic Manufacturers: The market is populated by numerous generic pharmaceutical companies that have received FDA and other regulatory approvals. Key players in the generic foscarnet sodium market include:
    • Teva Pharmaceuticals
    • Viatris (formerly Mylan N.V.)
    • Fresenius Kabi
    • Hikma Pharmaceuticals
    • Hospira (now part of Pfizer)
  • Competition Type: Competition is primarily based on price, product availability, and supply chain reliability. Manufacturers that can offer the lowest price while ensuring consistent supply and quality are most competitive.
  • Market Entry Barriers: For new entrants, the primary barriers are regulatory hurdles (obtaining ANDA approval) and the challenge of competing on price in a market already dominated by established generic players with economies of scale.
  • Absence of Originator Exclusivity: The originator, AstraZeneca, no longer holds market exclusivity for foscarnet sodium. While they may still offer a branded product, its market share is negligible compared to generics.
  • Alternative Therapies: Competition also arises from alternative antiviral drugs used for similar indications. For CMV retinitis, newer agents like ganciclovir, valganciclovir, and cidofovir are often preferred due to improved safety profiles or administration routes. For resistant HSV, other investigational or approved agents might be considered.
  • Specialty Pharma Focus: Some companies may focus on specific segments, such as hospital-administered injectables, where supply chain management and reliable delivery are critical.

The intense competition among generic manufacturers limits pricing power and profit margins, making foscarnet sodium a volume-driven product for many companies.

What are the Future Prospects and Potential Market Shifts for Foscarnet Sodium?

The future prospects for foscarnet sodium are largely constrained by its maturity, the dominance of generic competition, and the ongoing development of newer antiviral agents. Significant growth is not anticipated.

  • Sustained Niche Demand: Demand is expected to remain stable for its established indications, particularly in immunocompromised patient populations and for acyclovir-resistant viral infections. Its cost-effectiveness will continue to support its use in specific healthcare settings and geographic regions.
  • Erosion by Advanced Therapies: Over the long term, foscarnet sodium may experience gradual erosion of its market share as newer, more effective, or more convenient antiviral treatments become available and gain wider adoption, especially for CMV infections.
  • Limited R&D Innovation: Given the lack of patent protection and the mature nature of the drug, significant investment in novel R&D for foscarnet sodium itself is unlikely. Any future innovation would likely focus on process improvements for manufacturing or niche delivery methods, rather than new therapeutic applications.
  • Geopolitical and Economic Factors: Changes in global health policies, disease prevalence (e.g., HIV/AIDS), and economic conditions in key markets could influence demand. For instance, increased access to antiretroviral therapy might reduce the incidence of opportunistic infections like CMV retinitis, indirectly affecting foscarnet sodium demand.
  • Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: As with many generic drugs, the market is susceptible to supply chain disruptions from manufacturing issues, raw material shortages, or geopolitical events, which could lead to temporary shortages or price volatility.
  • Role in Combination Therapies: While unlikely to be a primary focus, research into potential synergistic effects with other antivirals or immunomodulators could theoretically identify new, albeit minor, applications. However, this is speculative.

The future market for foscarnet sodium is one of gradual stability with a low probability of significant resurgence or expansion. Its role will likely remain as a cost-effective, second-line or salvage therapy option.

Key Takeaways

Foscarnet sodium operates in a mature market characterized by expired patents and a highly competitive generic landscape. Its financial trajectory is projected to be stable rather than growth-oriented, driven by its established efficacy in specific viral infections and its affordability. Regulatory compliance and efficient manufacturing are key for generic players. While newer antiviral agents represent a long-term competitive challenge, foscarnet sodium is expected to retain a niche role as a cost-effective treatment option.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Are there any active patents that could provide market exclusivity for foscarnet sodium? No, the core patents covering the original formulation and primary therapeutic uses of foscarnet sodium have expired. While secondary patents related to manufacturing processes or novel formulations may exist, they are unlikely to confer broad market exclusivity against established generic competition.

  2. What is the primary driver for continued demand for foscarnet sodium? The primary drivers for continued demand are its proven efficacy in treating specific viral infections, particularly cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis and acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infections, especially in immunocompromised patients, combined with its cost-effectiveness compared to newer alternatives.

  3. What are the main challenges for generic manufacturers of foscarnet sodium? The main challenges include intense price competition from numerous generic players, the need for strict adherence to cGMP and regulatory requirements to maintain market access, ensuring a robust and cost-effective supply chain for API and finished product, and managing relatively low profit margins.

  4. Are there any significant new therapeutic indications being explored for foscarnet sodium? There is limited ongoing research exploring significant new therapeutic indications for foscarnet sodium. Its established role is well-defined, and R&D efforts have largely shifted to developing novel antiviral agents with improved mechanisms of action and broader applicability.

  5. How does foscarnet sodium compare in price to newer antiviral treatments for CMV? Foscarnet sodium is significantly more affordable than many newer antiviral treatments for CMV, particularly oral agents like valganciclovir or newer intravenously administered drugs that may offer improved safety profiles or convenience, making it a preferred option in cost-sensitive healthcare settings.

Citations

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug Approvals & Databases. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases [2] European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). Medicines. Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines [3] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.). USPTO Patent Search. Retrieved from https://patft.uspto.gov/ [4] AstraZeneca PLC. (Various years). Annual Reports and SEC Filings. (Specific filings related to foscarnet sodium patents and market history, accessible through company investor relations or SEC EDGAR database). [5] Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. (Various years). Annual Reports and Investor Communications. (Information regarding generic drug approvals and market presence). [6] Viatris Inc. (Various years). Annual Reports and Investor Communications. (Information regarding generic drug approvals and market presence). [7] Pharmaceutical data and market research reports (e.g., from IQVIA, EvaluatePharma, GlobalData). (Proprietary data not publicly accessible, used for market size and trajectory projections).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.