Share This Page
List of Excipients in Branded Drug PYRAZINAMIDE
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Generic Drugs Containing PYRAZINAMIDE
What are the Most Frequently-Used Excipients in PYRAZINAMIDE?
| # Of NDCs | Excipient |
|---|---|
| 1 | CALCIUM PHOSPHATE, DIBASIC, DIHYDRATE |
| 5 | CELLULOSE, MICROCRYSTALLINE |
| 5 | CROSCARMELLOSE SODIUM |
| 4 | DIBASIC CALCIUM PHOSPHATE DIHYDRATE |
| 11 | MAGNESIUM STEARATE |
| 1 | POVIDONE |
| ># Of NDCs | >Excipient |
Pyrazinamide Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities
Pyrazinamide is an established tuberculosis drug with limited patent protection, multiple generic suppliers, and high public-sector demand. The strongest commercial opportunities are not new chemical entity exclusivity. They are pediatric dispersible tablets, fixed-dose combinations, taste-masked oral liquids, heat- and humidity-stable products, and procurement-qualified formulations.
Pyrazinamide is used with rifampicin, isoniazid, and ethambutol during the intensive phase of treatment for drug-susceptible tuberculosis. Its principal formulation advantages are high aqueous solubility and compatibility with immediate-release oral products. Its main development challenges are bitter taste, dose size, regimen adherence, excipient compatibility in fixed-dose combinations, and low-margin global procurement markets.
What is the regulatory status of pyrazinamide?
Pyrazinamide is an FDA-approved antitubercular drug used only as part of a multidrug tuberculosis regimen. The FDA labeling identifies it for the initial intensive phase of treatment with other antitubercular agents, usually for approximately two months in drug-susceptible disease [1].
| Regulatory attribute | Pyrazinamide position |
|---|---|
| Active ingredient | Pyrazinamide |
| Therapeutic class | Antimycobacterial |
| Primary use | Tuberculosis treatment |
| Typical dosage form | Immediate-release tablet |
| Common strengths | 500 mg and 750 mg; product availability varies |
| FDA pathway | Generic approvals and legacy products |
| New chemical entity exclusivity | Expired |
| Orphan-drug exclusivity | Not a principal commercial protection |
| Biosimilar pathway | Not applicable |
| Orange Book relevance | Product-specific listings for approved generic products; no biologic reference-product framework |
| Main market | Public-sector tuberculosis programs and generic retail channels |
The World Health Organization recommends pyrazinamide as part of the standard six-month regimen for drug-susceptible tuberculosis. Pediatric dosing is weight-based and commonly administered at approximately 35 mg/kg daily, within the WHO-recommended dosing range [2].
What excipients are used in pyrazinamide tablets?
Immediate-release tablets generally use conventional excipients because pyrazinamide is sufficiently soluble for rapid dissolution. The commercial objective is low-cost, robust compression rather than modified release.
Representative excipient functions include:
| Formulation function | Common excipient options | Commercial purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Diluent | Microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, dibasic calcium phosphate, starch | Controls tablet weight and compressibility |
| Binder | Povidone, pregelatinized starch, hydroxypropyl cellulose | Improves granule and tablet strength |
| Disintegrant | Croscarmellose sodium, sodium starch glycolate, crospovidone | Supports rapid breakup after administration |
| Lubricant | Magnesium stearate, sodium stearyl fumarate | Reduces sticking and ejection force |
| Glidant | Colloidal silicon dioxide, talc | Improves powder flow |
| Opacifier or colorant | Titanium dioxide, approved iron oxides | Supports product identification |
| Film coating | Hypromellose, polyethylene glycol, talc | Improves swallowability and handling |
The exact excipient system must be selected through compatibility, dissolution, stability, and process studies. Public labels for pyrazinamide products show that manufacturers use conventional tablet excipients, but composition varies by supplier and market [3].
Which excipient properties matter most?
The critical properties are:
- Fast and reproducible disintegration.
- Acceptable tablet hardness at low compression force.
- Stable dissolution across tropical humidity conditions.
- Low risk of sticking during high-speed compression.
- Compatibility with rifampicin, isoniazid, and ethambutol in fixed-dose combinations.
- Acceptable taste and mouthfeel if the product is intended for pediatric dispersion.
Pyrazinamide does not require a complex solubilization platform in a standard tablet. The development budget is better directed toward manufacturability, taste management, and long-term stability.
What formulation patents protect pyrazinamide products?
Pyrazinamide has been used clinically for decades. Core composition-of-matter protection and early product patents have expired. Current competitive protection is more likely to arise from formulation know-how, manufacturing controls, trademark rights, procurement qualification, and regulatory files than from enforceable pyrazinamide molecule patents.
Potentially relevant intellectual-property categories include:
- Fixed-dose combination ratios.
- Pediatric dispersible tablet compositions.
- Taste-masking systems.
- Multiparticulate or granule formulations.
- Low-dust manufacturing processes.
- Moisture-protective packaging.
- Coated particles or granules for oral suspension.
- Combination products designed for rapid dissolution.
- Device or dosing systems for pediatric administration.
A formulation patent must provide a meaningful technical distinction, such as a defined dissolution profile, improved stability, reduced degradation, better taste scores, or a reproducible manufacturing advantage. A simple substitution of one conventional filler for another is unlikely to create strong protection unless the claimed combination produces an unexpected result.
When does pyrazinamide lose exclusivity?
Pyrazinamide has already lost the exclusivity associated with its original approval. The practical market has been generic for many years.
| Exclusivity category | Status |
|---|---|
| New chemical entity exclusivity | Expired |
| Patent term for the active molecule | Expired |
| Pediatric exclusivity | No meaningful current barrier |
| Regulatory exclusivity for ordinary tablets | Not a current market barrier |
| Reference-product protection | Limited commercial significance |
| Generic substitution | Established |
| Biosimilar exclusivity | Not applicable |
No commercially material patent cliff remains for ordinary pyrazinamide tablets. The relevant launch question is whether a new product can obtain approval, satisfy quality requirements, and compete in tenders or distribution channels.
How many patents cover pyrazinamide?
The number of historical patent documents involving pyrazinamide is larger than the number of live, commercially relevant rights. Older patents may cover synthesis, combinations, or dosage forms, but the active ingredient itself is not protected by an enforceable modern composition-of-matter patent.
For a new pyrazinamide product, the key freedom-to-operate review should focus on:
- Active patents in the target jurisdictions.
- Patent families covering pediatric dispersible formulations.
- Combination-product claims.
- Manufacturing-process claims.
- Coating and taste-masking claims.
- Regulatory exclusivity attached to a specific reference product.
- Third-party trademarks and trade dress.
The absence of a strong core patent estate does not eliminate risk. It shifts the risk from molecule ownership to formulation claims, process claims, regulatory compliance, and commercial execution.
What pediatric formulations are protected by pyrazinamide excipient strategy?
Pediatric formulations offer the clearest product-development opportunity. Young children may have difficulty swallowing tablets, and standard tablets can produce dosing errors when caregivers split or crush them.
Dispersible tablets
A dispersible tablet can be designed to dissolve in a small volume of water before administration. Key development targets include:
- Rapid dispersion without large particles.
- Low sedimentation.
- Acceptable bitter taste.
- Low tablet friability.
- Adequate stability after opening the container.
- Dose flexibility for weight-band dosing.
- Compatibility with co-formulated antitubercular drugs.
Common excipient tools include mannitol or lactose for mouthfeel, crospovidone or croscarmellose sodium for rapid dispersion, and sweeteners or flavors for taste reduction. Highly porous direct-compression excipients can reduce disintegration time but may increase tablet friability or packaging sensitivity.
Oral granules and powders
Granules may provide better dose flexibility than a fixed-strength tablet. They can be packaged in unit-dose sachets or multidose bottles. The main risks are segregation, dust generation, moisture uptake, and dose nonuniformity.
Oral suspensions
A pyrazinamide suspension can address swallowing barriers but creates more demanding stability and preservative requirements. A commercial suspension must control:
- Sedimentation and redispersibility.
- Sediment caking.
- Viscosity.
- Preservative effectiveness.
- Microbial quality.
- Dose uniformity after shaking.
- In-use stability after opening.
Suspension excipients may include xanthan gum, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, sorbitol, glycerin, sucrose, buffers, preservatives, and flavors. The bitter taste of pyrazinamide makes a suspension more difficult to commercialize than a neutral immediate-release tablet.
What fixed-dose combinations use pyrazinamide?
Pyrazinamide is commercially important as a component of fixed-dose combinations, especially with rifampicin, isoniazid, and ethambutol. Combination products reduce pill burden and support standardized treatment regimens.
A four-drug intensive-phase combination usually contains:
- Rifampicin
- Isoniazid
- Pyrazinamide
- Ethambutol
A three-drug combination may contain rifampicin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide.
What are the excipient challenges in fixed-dose combinations?
Fixed-dose combinations create technical problems that do not arise in a single-ingredient tablet:
- Different active ingredients have different particle sizes and densities.
- Rifampicin can be sensitive to moisture and chemical interactions.
- Isoniazid may participate in degradation pathways involving other components.
- Ethambutol can affect tablet weight and compression behavior.
- The high pyrazinamide dose can dominate tablet size.
- A single disintegration system must support all active ingredients.
- Dissolution specifications must be met for each component.
A bilayer or multilayer tablet can separate incompatible ingredients, but it increases manufacturing complexity and cost. A monolithic tablet is cheaper but demands stronger formulation and process controls.
For many public-sector markets, the preferred platform is a conventional immediate-release fixed-dose tablet with high dose uniformity, rapid dissolution, and protective packaging.
What generic entry risks exist for pyrazinamide?
Generic entry risk is high because:
- The active ingredient is old and widely manufactured.
- Core patents have expired.
- Multiple suppliers operate in regulated and semi-regulated markets.
- Standard tablet technology is accessible.
- Treatment guidelines support continued use.
- Buyers often prioritize price, registration status, and procurement history.
Generic competition is less intense in products that require:
- WHO prequalification.
- Pediatric dispersible dosage forms.
- Stringent bioequivalence evidence.
- Multi-active fixed-dose combination development.
- Climate-zone IV stability.
- Government tender qualification.
- Reliable supply of pharmaceutical-grade API.
The principal barrier is execution, not patent infringement.
Which companies are challenging pyrazinamide patents?
No major current Paragraph IV campaign is associated with ordinary pyrazinamide tablets. Pyrazinamide is a mature generic product rather than a branded product facing a contemporary patent challenge.
What is the Paragraph IV status of pyrazinamide?
Paragraph IV litigation is generally relevant when an ANDA applicant alleges that a listed patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed. Because pyrazinamide’s core patents expired long ago and the market is populated by generic products, a current Paragraph IV strategy is not the central commercial issue.
A new entrant should still review the FDA Orange Book for the specific reference product and dosage form before filing. Any risk is more likely to involve a formulation or combination patent than the pyrazinamide molecule itself [4].
What is the Orange Book status of pyrazinamide?
The Orange Book is relevant for identifying approved drug products, reference-listed drugs, therapeutic equivalence information, and any listed patents or exclusivity associated with a specific product [4].
For pyrazinamide, the commercial picture is generally:
- Multiple approved generic products.
- Established immediate-release tablet products.
- No active NCE exclusivity.
- No biosimilar reference-product pathway.
- Limited relevance of listed patent barriers for conventional tablets.
- Product-specific review required for each strength and dosage form.
An applicant should avoid assuming that a patent-free tablet market automatically covers a new suspension, dispersible tablet, or fixed-dose combination. Those products may raise separate regulatory and patent questions.
What patent litigation affects pyrazinamide?
Pyrazinamide has no widely recognized current litigation pattern comparable to high-value branded drugs such as GLP-1 agonists, oncology products, or specialty biologics. Litigation exposure is more likely to arise from:
- Contract manufacturing disputes.
- API quality claims.
- Product liability.
- Procurement exclusion.
- Trademark disputes.
- Trade-secret disputes.
- Patent disputes involving a novel formulation or combination.
For a conventional generic tablet, litigation risk is low relative to regulatory and supply-chain risk.
What commercial opportunities exist for pyrazinamide?
1. Pediatric dispersible fixed-dose combinations
This is the strongest product opportunity. A well-designed pediatric combination can compete on dose accuracy, acceptability, packaging, and programmatic usability rather than on molecule exclusivity.
2. WHO-prequalified products
WHO prequalification can improve access to international procurement channels. The process requires evidence of quality, manufacturing compliance, stability, and product performance [5].
3. Climate-stable tablets
Products designed for high heat and humidity can reduce degradation and packaging failures in high-burden regions. Aluminum-aluminum blisters, high-barrier bottles, desiccants, and moisture-controlled manufacturing can support this positioning.
4. Flexible-dose granules
Weight-band dosing and sachet-based granules may address pediatric and decentralized-care needs. The main commercial challenge is packaging cost and the need to demonstrate dose uniformity.
5. Regional manufacturing and licensing
Licensing opportunities may involve:
- Transfer of a pediatric formulation.
- Local production under a technology-transfer agreement.
- Supply of prequalified tablets to national programs.
- Contract manufacturing of fixed-dose combinations.
- Regional packaging and distribution rights.
Unlike a patented branded drug, the value of a pyrazinamide licensing deal is driven by regulatory files, procurement access, manufacturing reliability, and market authorization.
How large is the revenue exposure for pyrazinamide?
Pyrazinamide revenue is linked to tuberculosis incidence, treatment coverage, public procurement, and regimen duration. WHO estimated that approximately 10.8 million people developed tuberculosis in 2023, with more than 1.2 million deaths [6].
Commercial revenue is difficult to attribute because pyrazinamide is often sold inside low-priced fixed-dose combinations. The highest-volume markets are typically public-sector programs, where prices are compressed and contracts may be awarded through competitive tenders.
Revenue exposure is therefore strongest for suppliers with:
- WHO prequalification.
- Large-scale API access.
- Government registrations.
- Reliable tender performance.
- Fixed-dose combination capability.
- Low-cost high-volume manufacturing.
- Supply continuity during procurement cycles.
Standalone pyrazinamide tablets can provide stable volume but usually have limited pricing power. Pediatric combinations and differentiated presentations may support better margins.
How strong is the pyrazinamide patent estate?
The patent estate for ordinary pyrazinamide tablets is weak from a blocking-rights perspective. Product differentiation can still be strong when supported by regulatory data, manufacturing know-how, procurement qualification, and a defensible formulation patent.
| Estate component | Strength |
|---|---|
| Core molecule patent | Very weak or expired |
| Standard tablet composition | Weak |
| Pediatric dispersible formulation | Potentially moderate |
| Taste-masked suspension | Potentially moderate |
| Fixed-dose combination | Depends on claims and technical results |
| Manufacturing process | Potentially moderate |
| Regulatory file and approval | Commercially important |
| Trademark and brand | Market-specific |
| Supply qualification | Often highly valuable in public procurement |
What manufacturing and IP barriers affect pyrazinamide?
Manufacturing barriers include API impurity control, particle-size consistency, blend uniformity, tablet weight, dissolution, and packaging performance. In fixed-dose combinations, the highest technical risk is maintaining chemical and physical stability for all active ingredients through shelf life.
Potential IP barriers are narrower:
- Active formulation patents.
- Coating and taste-masking claims.
- Combination-product claims.
- Process patents.
- Proprietary excipient systems.
- Device and dosing claims.
A robust development program should use excipient screening, forced-degradation testing, design-of-experiments studies, dissolution profiling, and accelerated stability under high-temperature and high-humidity conditions.
Key Takeaways
- Pyrazinamide is a mature, generic antitubercular drug with no meaningful remaining core-molecule exclusivity.
- Conventional immediate-release tablets require standard excipients rather than advanced delivery technology.
- Pediatric dispersible tablets, granules, suspensions, and fixed-dose combinations offer the best commercial opportunities.
- Taste masking, dispersion, dose flexibility, and tropical stability are the principal formulation priorities.
- The strongest market protections are regulatory approval, WHO prequalification, procurement access, manufacturing reliability, and formulation know-how.
- Paragraph IV litigation and biosimilar risk are not central issues for ordinary pyrazinamide products.
- Revenue is volume-driven and concentrated in public-sector tuberculosis programs.
- A new formulation patent is most credible when it demonstrates improved stability, dissolution, palatability, dose uniformity, or manufacturing performance.
FAQs About Pyrazinamide Excipient Strategy
Can pyrazinamide be formulated as an oral suspension?
Yes. The main development issues are bitter taste, sedimentation, redispersibility, preservative effectiveness, microbial control, and dose uniformity after shaking.
Is pyrazinamide suitable for direct compression?
It may be suitable depending on particle morphology, flow, compressibility, and dose loading. High-dose tablets often require a formulation assessment to control weight variation, hardness, friability, and dissolution.
Which excipients improve the taste of pyrazinamide?
Sweeteners, flavors, polyols, polymeric coatings, ion-exchange systems, and coated granules may reduce perceived bitterness. The appropriate approach depends on dose, dosage form, and stability requirements.
Does pyrazinamide require a modified-release formulation?
Usually no. Standard tuberculosis regimens use immediate-release administration. Modified release would require a clear clinical or adherence benefit to justify added development and regulatory complexity.
Can pyrazinamide be co-formulated with rifampicin?
Yes. It is commonly included in fixed-dose tuberculosis combinations with rifampicin, isoniazid, and sometimes ethambutol. The formulation must address active-ingredient compatibility, dissolution, moisture sensitivity, and dose uniformity.
References
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Pyrazinamide tablets: Prescribing information. FDA/DailyMed.
-
World Health Organization. (2022). WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis: Module 4: Treatment - drug-susceptible tuberculosis treatment. World Health Organization.
-
National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). DailyMed: Pyrazinamide tablet product labeling. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations, Orange Book. FDA.
-
World Health Organization. (n.d.). WHO prequalification of medicines. World Health Organization.
-
World Health Organization. (2024). Global tuberculosis report 2024. World Health Organization.
More… ↓
Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing
Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.
Alerts Available With Subscription
Alerts are available for users with active subscriptions.
Visit the Subscription Options page for details on plans and pricing.
ISSN: 2162-2639

Privacy and Cookies
Terms & Conditions
Site Map
DrugPatentWatch Alternatives
LOE / Generic Entry Opportunies 2026 - 2027
NCE-1 Patent Challenge Dates 2026 - 2027
Friedman, Yali. "DrugPatentWatch" DrugPatentWatch, thinkBiotech, 2026, www.DrugPatentWatch.com.
See Primary Research Papers Citing DrugPatentWatch
Access the Complete Database
Deeper Knowledge, Faster
- Analyze global market entry opportunities
- Uncover prior art in expired and abandoned patents
- Drug patents in 130+ countries