Share This Page
List of Excipients in Branded Drug PENTOBARBITAL SODIUM
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Generic Drugs Containing PENTOBARBITAL SODIUM
| Company | Ingredient | NDC | Excipient |
|---|---|---|---|
| Akorn | pentobarbital sodium | 17478-181 | ALCOHOL |
| Akorn | pentobarbital sodium | 17478-181 | HYDROCHLORIC ACID |
| Akorn | pentobarbital sodium | 17478-181 | PROPYLENE GLYCOL |
| Akorn | pentobarbital sodium | 17478-181 | SODIUM HYDROXIDE |
| Akorn | pentobarbital sodium | 17478-181 | WATER |
| Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc | pentobarbital sodium | 24201-010 | ALCOHOL |
| Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc | pentobarbital sodium | 24201-010 | PROPYLENE GLYCOL |
| >Company | >Ingredient | >NDC | >Excipient |
What are the Most Frequently-Used Excipients in PENTOBARBITAL SODIUM?
| # Of NDCs | Excipient |
|---|---|
| 3 | ALCOHOL |
| 2 | HYDROCHLORIC ACID |
| 3 | PROPYLENE GLYCOL |
| 2 | SODIUM HYDROXIDE |
| 3 | WATER |
| ># Of NDCs | >Excipient |
Pentobarbital sodium is an off-patent, tightly controlled barbiturate with limited conventional pharmaceutical growth prospects. The strongest excipient opportunities are formulation upgrades rather than new chemical entities: lower-toxicity injectable vehicles, ready-to-use presentations, improved container compatibility, oral taste masking, and animal-health products designed for controlled administration. Commercial access is constrained by Schedule II controls in the United States, restricted distribution, procurement scrutiny, and a narrow approved-use market.
Pentobarbital Sodium Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities
What is the commercial status of pentobarbital sodium?
Pentobarbital sodium is the water-soluble sodium salt of pentobarbital, a short- to intermediate-acting barbiturate. It has been used as a sedative, hypnotic, anticonvulsant, anesthetic adjunct, and euthanasia agent. In the United States, pentobarbital is a Schedule II controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act.[1]
The product is commercially relevant in three principal settings:
| Market | Typical dosage form | Commercial position |
|---|---|---|
| Human hospital use | Sterile injectable solution | Restricted, low-volume institutional market |
| Veterinary medicine | Injectable solution and other controlled presentations | More commercially active than human outpatient use |
| Research and specialty use | Controlled liquid or injectable formats | Small, highly regulated market |
Pentobarbital sodium is off patent as an active pharmaceutical ingredient. The commercial value is concentrated in manufacturing authorization, controlled-substance distribution, formulation quality, supply reliability, and customer access rather than basic molecule ownership.
Historically marketed Nembutal products established the reference formulation, but current supply is primarily associated with generic or specialty manufacturers. Product availability, label status, and distribution vary by jurisdiction and time. FDA labeling and DailyMed records identify approved or marketed presentations and their excipient compositions.[2,3]
What excipients are used in pentobarbital sodium formulations?
The principal excipient issue is solubilization. Pentobarbital sodium is highly water soluble relative to the free acid, but concentrated injectable products require a mixed-solvent system to maintain clarity, stability, and acceptable handling.
Injectable formulation excipients
Commercial pentobarbital sodium injections commonly use:
- Water for Injection
- Propylene glycol
- Ethanol
- Sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid for pH adjustment
- In some products, preservatives or other stabilizing components
A representative injectable formulation contains pentobarbital sodium in a high-pH aqueous system with propylene glycol and alcohol as cosolvents.[2,3] The exact composition depends on the manufacturer, concentration, container, and regulatory filing.
The formulation creates several technical constraints:
- Propylene glycol can cause injection-site pain, hyperosmolarity, and systemic toxicity at high exposure.
- Ethanol can create tolerability, labeling, and handling concerns.
- High pH can affect tissue tolerability and compatibility with elastomeric closures.
- Concentrated solutions can precipitate after dilution or temperature changes.
- Sorption and extractables may become relevant with plastic syringes, infusion sets, and storage containers.
Oral formulation excipients
Oral pentobarbital sodium capsules and liquid preparations may use conventional excipients such as:
- Lactose or other fillers
- Starch-based disintegrants
- Magnesium stearate
- Talc
- Gelatin capsule shells
- Purified water
- Sweeteners, flavors, and viscosity agents in liquids
The commercial challenge for oral products is less solubility than dose uniformity, palatability, controlled dispensing, and prevention of accidental exposure. A formulation intended for veterinary use may prioritize rapid administration and tamper-resistant packaging over patient acceptability.
Which excipient strategies have the greatest commercial potential?
The highest-value opportunities involve reducing formulation liabilities while preserving the established route of administration.
1. Reduced-solvent injectable systems
A lower-propylene-glycol formulation could reduce injection-site discomfort and systemic solvent exposure. Potential approaches include:
- Higher-efficiency cosolvent combinations
- Complexation or cyclodextrin systems
- pH optimization
- Concentration adjustment
- Co-solvent replacement with lower-toxicity pharmaceutical solvents
- Improved sodium-salt crystallinity and particle control
The main regulatory barrier is demonstrating that the revised excipient system does not alter pharmacokinetics, local tolerability, precipitation behavior, or dosing reliability. Because pentobarbital is a narrow-therapeutic-index controlled drug, formulation changes would require careful comparative testing.
2. Ready-to-use hospital and veterinary presentations
Ready-to-use prefilled syringes, unit-dose vials, or closed-system bags could reduce preparation errors and occupational exposure. This opportunity is most relevant where institutions administer pentobarbital under emergency, anesthesia, or euthanasia protocols.
Potential formats include:
- Single-dose prefilled syringes
- Low-volume vials
- Barcode-enabled unit-dose packaging
- Tamper-evident veterinary syringes
- Closed-transfer systems
- Dilution-stable infusion containers
The value proposition is operational. The product would compete on availability, dose accuracy, reduced manipulation, and controlled inventory management rather than price alone.
3. Container-closure and compatibility systems
Pentobarbital sodium solutions are alkaline and solvent-containing. Primary packaging therefore has a material impact on stability and usability.
Relevant development areas include:
- Low-extractable glass vials
- Fluoropolymer-coated elastomeric stoppers
- Low-sorption syringe components
- Compatibility with polypropylene and cyclic olefin polymer systems
- Improved protection from light and temperature excursions
- Reduced leachables from seals and administration sets
A container-closure package supported by strong extractables and leachables data could create a practical differentiation platform for generic manufacturers.
4. Oral taste masking and controlled dispensing
Oral liquid pentobarbital products face bitterness, dosing errors, and diversion risk. Excipient opportunities include:
- Ion-exchange resin complexes
- Lipid or polymeric taste-masking systems
- High-viscosity suspensions
- Unit-dose oral syringes
- Child-resistant and tamper-evident packaging
- Colorants or flavor systems compatible with controlled-drug labeling
Taste masking must not delay absorption materially or create dose nonuniformity. The strongest commercial application is veterinary medicine, where liquid administration may be preferred but palatability and handling remain operational problems.
What formulation patents could protect pentobarbital sodium products?
Pentobarbital sodium itself has no meaningful modern composition-of-matter exclusivity. A new patent position would likely depend on formulation or device claims.
Potentially protectable subject matter includes:
| Patent category | Example claim focus | Commercial value |
|---|---|---|
| Solvent system | Defined propylene glycol, ethanol, water, and pH ranges | Moderate if performance improves |
| Low-toxicity injection | Reduced solvent burden with maintained solubility | High if clinically meaningful |
| Stabilized solution | Resistance to precipitation or degradation | Moderate |
| Container system | Specific syringe, stopper, or coated vial | Moderate |
| Oral delivery | Taste-masked liquid or capsule | Moderate in veterinary markets |
| Unit-dose device | Controlled dispensing or tamper resistance | Moderate |
| Manufacturing process | Crystallization, filtration, or aseptic filling process | Limited unless difficult to design around |
| Method of use | Specific sedation or euthanasia protocol | Narrow and commercially dependent on jurisdiction |
A formulation patent would need more than the substitution of one conventional excipient for another. Stronger claims would connect a defined composition with measurable advantages such as:
- Reduced precipitation after dilution
- Lower injection-site irritation
- Improved shelf life
- Lower impurity formation
- Reduced adsorption to administration equipment
- Consistent delivered dose
- Improved stability across temperature ranges
Because the active ingredient is old, obviousness risk is substantial. A patent strategy should combine composition claims, concentration ranges, pH limits, container claims, and process claims where the data support each category.
When does pentobarbital sodium lose exclusivity?
Pentobarbital sodium has already lost traditional small-molecule exclusivity. The relevant commercial protections are regulatory approvals, manufacturing controls, controlled-substance permissions, supply contracts, and any later-filed formulation or device patents.
| Exclusivity type | Pentobarbital sodium position |
|---|---|
| Composition-of-matter patent | Expired |
| Original product patent | Expired or commercially irrelevant |
| Generic entry | Established historically |
| New chemical entity exclusivity | Not applicable to the mature molecule |
| Orphan-drug exclusivity | Not a general protection for current pentobarbital products |
| Pediatric exclusivity | Product-specific and not a general market barrier |
| Formulation exclusivity | Possible only through later approvals or patents |
| Controlled-substance authorization | Operational requirement, not market exclusivity |
For a new formulation, the regulatory pathway could create limited product-specific protection, but the commercial life would depend on the extent of formulation differentiation and whether competitors can use another excipient system.
What is the FDA and Orange Book status of pentobarbital sodium?
FDA status is presentation-specific. Pentobarbital sodium products have been listed in FDA databases and labeling repositories in injectable and oral forms, but active marketing status can differ from historical approval status.[2,3]
The Orange Book is relevant for identifying listed patents and exclusivity associated with approved drug products. For an old generic product, the expected patent burden is low. A prospective manufacturer should distinguish among:
- FDA-approved product listings
- Current commercial availability
- Discontinued products
- Abbreviated New Drug Application status
- Orange Book patent listings
- DailyMed labeling
- DEA registration and ordering requirements
A formulation company should not assume that a historical Nembutal label proves current commercial availability. The operative questions are whether an approved application remains active, whether a manufacturer is currently supplying the product, and whether the proposed product requires a new application or a supplemental change.
Are Paragraph IV challenges relevant to pentobarbital sodium?
Paragraph IV litigation is unlikely to be a central risk for conventional pentobarbital sodium products because the core molecule and legacy formulations are long established. A Paragraph IV filing could arise if a new branded formulation obtained listed patents covering:
- A novel injectable vehicle
- A depot or modified-release dosage form
- A device-assisted presentation
- A protected oral delivery system
- A specific stabilized composition
For a conventional generic injectable, the greater risks are regulatory and operational:
- Failure to demonstrate sterile manufacturing control
- Inadequate extractables and leachables data
- Incompatibility with administration equipment
- Incomplete controlled-substance procedures
- Inability to secure reliable API supply
- Product interruption caused by limited manufacturing capacity
Which companies are competing in the pentobarbital sodium market?
The competitive market includes generic pharmaceutical manufacturers, specialty injectable companies, veterinary suppliers, and distributors authorized to handle controlled substances. The precise supplier group changes as products are discontinued, relaunched, or transferred between manufacturers.
Competition is shaped by five factors:
- DEA-controlled procurement and inventory requirements.
- Limited institutional demand in human medicine.
- Veterinary demand for reliable injectable supply.
- High regulatory burden for sterile manufacturing.
- Customer preference for dependable availability over minor price differences.
A formulation supplier can participate without marketing the active drug by selling:
- Pharmaceutical-grade cosolvents
- Low-extractable packaging
- Prefilled syringe components
- Taste-masking excipient platforms
- Stability-indicating analytical methods
- Controlled-drug packaging systems
- Contract development and manufacturing services
What manufacturing and intellectual-property barriers affect commercial entry?
The largest barrier is not patent exclusion. It is the combination of controlled-substance compliance and sterile injectable manufacturing.
API and process barriers
Pentobarbital sodium manufacturing requires control of:
- Assay and impurity profile
- Sodium conversion and crystallization
- Residual solvents
- Particle burden
- Water content
- Microbial quality
- Aseptic processing
- Stability under alkaline conditions
A process patent may provide limited protection, but manufacturing know-how can still create a meaningful practical barrier. Reliable sterile filling at low commercial volumes is particularly important because the market may not support multiple high-capacity producers.
Distribution barriers
United States suppliers must manage DEA registration, procurement quotas, security controls, records, audits, theft prevention, and disposal procedures.[1] These obligations increase fixed costs and discourage opportunistic entrants.
Geographic coverage
The United States is the most restrictive major market because of controlled-substance rules and heightened scrutiny of pentobarbital distribution. European and other markets apply separate narcotics, medicinal-product, veterinary, and euthanasia controls. A formulation platform must be evaluated against region-specific excipient permissions, labeling requirements, packaging rules, and controlled-drug distribution laws.
How does pentobarbital sodium compare with competing sedative and euthanasia products?
| Product category | Main advantage | Excipient opportunity | Commercial constraint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pentobarbital sodium injection | Established effect and rapid administration | Lower-solvent, ready-to-use, compatibility systems | Schedule II control and supply restrictions |
| Phenobarbital products | Longer duration and established oral use | Taste masking and controlled-release formulations | Less suitable for rapid procedural use |
| Propofol injection | Rapid onset and short recovery | Emulsion stability and antimicrobial control | Different clinical profile and storage burden |
| Veterinary euthanasia combinations | Familiar administration protocols | Palatability, viscosity, and dosing devices | Animal-health regulatory requirements |
| Benzodiazepine-based sedation | Broad procedural use | Solubilization and low-volume delivery | Does not replicate pentobarbital’s full use profile |
Pentobarbital’s formulation opportunity is strongest where its established pharmacology matters and where customers experience solvent burden, supply interruptions, or administration risk.
What revenue exposure and launch scenarios exist?
Pentobarbital sodium is unlikely to support a large mass-market launch. Revenue potential is more credible in specialized supply niches.
| Launch scenario | Product concept | Revenue profile | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generic injectable | Conventional vial | Low to moderate | Price competition and controlled distribution |
| Premium injectable | Lower-solvent or improved compatibility | Moderate | Clinical and regulatory evidence burden |
| Ready-to-use product | Prefilled syringe or unit dose | Moderate | Device, stability, and controlled-substance controls |
| Veterinary liquid | Taste-masked or easier-to-administer product | Moderate | Market access and diversion controls |
| Excipient platform licensing | Vehicle, packaging, or taste masking | Moderate | Requires multiple licensees |
| Global specialty supply | Region-specific controlled product | Variable | Different narcotics regulations |
The most attractive business model may be licensing an enabling formulation or packaging technology to an approved manufacturer rather than independently commercializing pentobarbital sodium.
How strong is the patent estate for pentobarbital sodium?
The legacy patent estate is weak. The molecule is mature, generic competition exists, and conventional excipient combinations are vulnerable to obviousness challenges.
A new patent estate could be stronger if it includes:
- A non-obvious solvent architecture
- Demonstrated reduction in toxicity or local irritation
- A clinically useful concentration not previously enabled
- A validated container-closure interaction solution
- A device that reduces controlled-drug handling risk
- Data showing improved stability after dilution or temperature stress
Patent strength would remain moderate at best unless the formulation produces a clear, reproducible, and commercially important advantage. Freedom-to-operate analysis should focus on later formulation patents, device patents, and packaging claims rather than expired compound patents.
Key Takeaways
- Pentobarbital sodium is an off-patent, Schedule II barbiturate with a narrow but persistent institutional and veterinary market.
- The main excipient problem is the high-solvent, alkaline injectable formulation.
- The strongest development opportunities are reduced-solvent injections, ready-to-use presentations, low-extractable packaging, and taste-masked oral products.
- Conventional excipient substitutions are unlikely to produce strong patent protection without comparative performance data.
- Controlled-substance distribution, sterile manufacturing, and reliable API supply are greater entry barriers than legacy patents.
- A licensing strategy focused on formulation, packaging, or delivery technology may be more attractive than a standalone drug launch.
- Generic entry risk is high for conventional products but lower for differentiated presentations supported by formulation or device patents.
- FDA approval, DailyMed labeling, Orange Book records, and DEA authorization must be assessed at the specific product and manufacturer level.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can propylene glycol be removed from pentobarbital sodium injection?
It may be technically possible, but removal requires a replacement solubilization strategy and comparative testing for clarity, precipitation, stability, tolerability, and delivered dose. A simple water-only formulation is unlikely to support the same concentration and shelf life.
Is pentobarbital sodium suitable for a new extended-release formulation?
The molecule could be evaluated for modified release, but the commercial rationale is limited. Extended-release delivery would require a new pharmacokinetic and safety package and would compete with established sedative and anticonvulsant therapies.
What excipient has the greatest near-term value for pentobarbital sodium?
The highest near-term value is likely in a formulation or packaging system that reduces solvent exposure, improves container compatibility, or enables a reliable ready-to-use dose. The opportunity is operational rather than broad consumer demand.
Can veterinary pentobarbital sodium products use human pharmaceutical excipients?
They may use the same excipients if the formulation meets applicable veterinary regulatory, quality, safety, and labeling requirements. Human-product precedent does not automatically establish approval for an animal-health product.
Does pentobarbital sodium require a new patent to be commercially attractive?
No. A manufacturer can compete through an approved generic product, supply reliability, packaging, or distribution. A new patent becomes commercially important only when it protects a differentiated formulation, delivery device, or manufacturing process that competitors cannot easily design around.
References
-
U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. (2024). Controlled substances act: Schedule II substances and regulatory requirements. U.S. Department of Justice.
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Drugs@FDA: FDA-approved drug products containing pentobarbital sodium. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
-
National Library of Medicine. (2024). DailyMed: Pentobarbital sodium injection labeling and inactive ingredient information. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
-
United States Pharmacopeial Convention. (2024). United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary: Pentobarbital sodium and pharmaceutical excipient standards. USP Convention.
More… ↓
Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing
Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.
Alerts Available With Subscription
Alerts are available for users with active subscriptions.
Visit the Subscription Options page for details on plans and pricing.
ISSN: 2162-2639

Privacy and Cookies
Terms & Conditions
Site Map
DrugPatentWatch Alternatives
LOE / Generic Entry Opportunies 2026 - 2027
NCE-1 Patent Challenge Dates 2026 - 2027
Friedman, Yali. "DrugPatentWatch" DrugPatentWatch, thinkBiotech, 2026, www.DrugPatentWatch.com.
See Primary Research Papers Citing DrugPatentWatch
Access the Complete Database
Deeper Knowledge, Faster
- Analyze global market entry opportunities
- Uncover prior art in expired and abandoned patents
- Obtain formulation and manufacturing information