Share This Page
List of Excipients in Branded Drug IDAMYCIN PFS
✉ Email this page to a colleague
| Company | Tradename | Ingredient | NDC | Excipient | Potential Generic Entry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc | IDAMYCIN PFS | idarubicin hydrochloride | 0013-2576 | GLYCERIN | |
| Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc | IDAMYCIN PFS | idarubicin hydrochloride | 0013-2576 | HYDROCHLORIC ACID | |
| Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc | IDAMYCIN PFS | idarubicin hydrochloride | 0013-2576 | WATER | |
| >Company | >Tradename | >Ingredient | >NDC | >Excipient | >Potential Generic Entry |
Idamycin PFS Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities
Idamycin PFS is a ready-to-use injectable formulation of idarubicin hydrochloride, an anthracycline used with other antileukemic agents for acute myeloid leukemia. Its formulation is technically simple: an aqueous, preservative-free solution containing idarubicin hydrochloride, sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid and water for injection. The commercial opportunity is therefore unlikely to come from a novel excipient composition alone. The stronger opportunities are safer administration, improved container compatibility, ready-to-use hospital workflow, reduced hazardous-drug exposure and differentiated sterile supply.
What is Idamycin PFS and how is it formulated?
Idamycin PFS contains idarubicin hydrochloride for intravenous administration. The product is supplied as a sterile solution in a prefilled syringe and is intended for administration by healthcare professionals experienced in cytotoxic chemotherapy.[1]
The labeled formulation uses the following excipient strategy:
| Component | Formulation role | Commercial significance |
|---|---|---|
| Idarubicin hydrochloride | Active pharmaceutical ingredient | Anthracycline cytotoxic agent |
| Sodium chloride | Tonicity adjustment | Supports an isotonic injectable solution |
| Hydrochloric acid | pH adjustment and maintenance | Controls chemical stability and solubility |
| Water for injection | Vehicle | Sterile aqueous medium |
The absence of a preservative is commercially relevant. Preservatives can create compatibility, toxicity and regulatory issues in oncology injectables, particularly where the product is administered intravenously to immunocompromised patients. The formulation instead relies on aseptic manufacture, container closure integrity and controlled handling.
Idarubicin hydrochloride is an anthracycline with limited aqueous solubility relative to many conventional small-molecule injectables. The product therefore depends on pH control and a suitable aqueous environment rather than on cosolvents, surfactants or complexation agents. A generic developer changing the excipient system must show that the revised formulation preserves assay, impurities, sterility, particulate control, pH, osmolality and container compatibility.
What excipients protect the commercial performance of Idamycin PFS?
The commercial value of the excipient system comes from functional simplicity and hospital usability rather than from composition-of-matter exclusivity.
Sodium chloride
Sodium chloride supports injectable tonicity. Its use also reduces the need for more complex excipient systems that could introduce extractables, leachables or additional toxicological questions.
The main development risk is not the presence of sodium chloride itself. It is the interaction between tonicity, idarubicin concentration, pH and long-term chemical stability. A formulation with a different sodium chloride level may require comparative stability and, depending on the regulatory pathway, additional justification for clinical relevance.
Hydrochloric acid
Hydrochloric acid is used as a pH-adjusting agent. For idarubicin, pH control can affect solubility, degradation and the impurity profile. The acid is unlikely to create a standalone patent position because it is a conventional pharmaceutical excipient used for a standard formulation function.
A stronger technical position may arise from a narrowly defined pH range combined with:
- a specific idarubicin concentration;
- a defined impurity threshold;
- a particular syringe or polymer barrel;
- protection from light;
- a specified shelf life; and
- a validated sterilization or aseptic-processing method.
Such claims would be formulation or manufacturing claims, not broad excipient claims.
Water for injection
Water for injection is the vehicle. The key requirements are sterility, endotoxin control, particulate control and compatibility with the container closure system. Because the product is a ready-to-use cytotoxic injection, water quality and aseptic processing are central to product release.
What formulation patents could protect an idarubicin prefilled syringe?
A conventional idarubicin solution containing sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid and water for injection is unlikely to support a broad, durable formulation patent by itself. The more defensible patent targets are product-plus-container and process claims.
Potential patent categories
| Patent category | Example claim focus | Relative strength |
|---|---|---|
| Aqueous composition | Idarubicin concentration, pH and impurity limits | Low to moderate |
| Prefilled syringe | Syringe barrel, stopper, needle, lubrication and closure integrity | Moderate |
| Container compatibility | Reduced adsorption, reduced degradation or controlled leachables | Moderate |
| Light protection | Packaging or syringe system that limits photodegradation | Moderate |
| Ready-to-use administration | Premeasured dose and connection to a closed-system transfer device | Moderate |
| Manufacturing process | Aseptic filling, sterilization, hold time and oxygen control | Moderate |
| Stability package | Long-term stability at defined temperature and light exposure | Moderate if supported by unexpected data |
| Reduced hazardous-drug exposure | Integrated syringe and transfer system | Potentially strong commercially, but claim scope depends on implementation |
Broad claims covering "idarubicin, sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid and water" would face written-description, obviousness and enablement challenges if the formulation is already disclosed in regulatory or patent literature. Commercial value is more likely to come from a combination of formulation and delivery-system features.
When does Idamycin lose exclusivity?
Idamycin's principal active-ingredient exclusivity has expired. Idarubicin is an established small-molecule oncology drug, and generic idarubicin hydrochloride injections have been available in the United States.
The relevant exclusivity framework is:
| Protection type | Idamycin status |
|---|---|
| New chemical entity exclusivity | Expired |
| Orphan-drug exclusivity | No current blocking period for the legacy product |
| Pediatric exclusivity | No current blocking period identified for the legacy product |
| Active patent protection | No broad, commercially meaningful composition-of-matter protection remains |
| Biosimilar protection | Not applicable |
| Generic competition | Present or legally available for idarubicin hydrochloride injection |
The exact Orange Book status depends on the specific NDA, dosage form and product listing. FDA’s Orange Book identifies approved drug products and listed patents, while FDA’s Drugs@FDA database provides approval and labeling records.[2,3] A current diligence review should treat Idamycin PFS as a mature small-molecule product whose protection depends mainly on manufacturing, supply reliability, packaging and product differentiation.
What is the Orange Book status of Idamycin PFS?
Idamycin PFS is evaluated under the small-molecule drug framework, not the biologics framework. The relevant regulatory questions are:
- Whether the reference product remains listed as active under its original NDA.
- Whether the prefilled syringe is separately listed from vial presentations.
- Whether any patent information remains listed for the relevant reference product.
- Whether generic applicants have filed ANDAs referencing the applicable product.
- Whether the proposed generic uses the same dosage form, route and strength.
For a generic developer, the principal pathway is likely an ANDA under section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act if the proposed product can demonstrate pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence to the reference product.[4]
A materially different formulation, a new delivery device or a clinically meaningful new use could require a 505(b)(2) application instead. The distinction matters because a 505(b)(2) product may support a more differentiated label and formulation, but it usually carries greater development and regulatory cost.
Which companies are challenging or competing with Idamycin?
Competition is primarily from generic manufacturers and suppliers of idarubicin hydrochloride injection rather than from biosimilar developers. Idarubicin is a small molecule, so biosimilar approval is not relevant.
The competitive field includes:
- generic sterile-injectable manufacturers;
- branded-generic oncology suppliers;
- contract manufacturers with cytotoxic production capacity;
- hospital and specialty-pharmacy suppliers;
- manufacturers offering vial presentations rather than prefilled syringes; and
- developers of alternative anthracycline products.
Generic competitors can compete on acquisition cost, shortage resilience, package configuration and supply commitments. A prefilled syringe may command a premium if it produces measurable savings in pharmacy compounding, dose preparation, waste, handling time or hazardous-drug exposure.
What commercial opportunities exist for Idamycin excipient and delivery innovation?
1. Ready-to-use cytotoxic presentation
The strongest opportunity is a reliable ready-to-administer presentation. A prefilled syringe can reduce pharmacy preparation steps, lower dosing errors and limit manipulation of a hazardous drug. The value proposition is operational rather than pharmacological.
A successful product would need to demonstrate:
- accurate dose delivery;
- low overfill;
- container closure integrity;
- acceptable syringe glide force;
- low extractables and leachables;
- compatibility with oncology administration sets;
- protection from light; and
- stability through the labeled shelf life.
2. Closed-system drug transfer compatibility
A syringe designed for compatibility with closed-system transfer devices could improve handling safety. The commercial opportunity is strongest where hospitals have established hazardous-drug handling protocols and are willing to pay for reduced preparation complexity.
Patent protection could focus on the connection geometry, transfer sequence, pressure management or integrated closure system. A claim directed only to idarubicin in a syringe would likely be weaker than a claim covering a validated cytotoxic transfer architecture.
3. Reduced waste and dose flexibility
Idarubicin dosing is commonly calculated according to body-surface area and administered in oncology treatment cycles. Prefilled formats may create dose mismatch and product waste if available strengths do not align with prescribed doses.
Commercial opportunities include:
- multiple standardized syringe strengths;
- low-dead-volume syringes;
- dose-specific presentations;
- modular packaging for common body-surface-area doses; and
- improved residual-volume control.
The tradeoff is inventory complexity. More strengths can reduce waste but increase manufacturing changeovers, quality-control testing and hospital stocking requirements.
4. Container and material innovation
The syringe system must resist adsorption, precipitation, discoloration, chemical degradation and particulate formation. Potential approaches include:
- cyclic olefin polymer or cyclic olefin copolymer barrels;
- low-extractable elastomeric plungers;
- reduced-silicone or silicone-free lubrication;
- tungsten-free glass where applicable;
- light-protective secondary packaging; and
- low-permeability closure systems.
The regulatory burden is material-specific. A new polymer or elastomer can trigger extractables and leachables work, stability studies and container-closure integrity testing. The business case depends on whether the material solves a demonstrated problem.
5. Stability extension
A longer shelf life can create commercial value in hospital inventory and shortage management. The most valuable stability improvements would be:
- extended refrigerated shelf life;
- improved room-temperature excursion tolerance;
- reduced sensitivity to light;
- reduced degradation after syringe preparation; and
- defined in-use stability after removal from secondary packaging.
Stability claims must be supported by validated analytical methods capable of distinguishing idarubicin degradation products from formulation and container-related impurities.
How does Idamycin PFS compare with vial-based idarubicin?
| Attribute | Idamycin PFS | Vial-based idarubicin |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacy preparation | Minimal or none | Requires withdrawal and dose preparation |
| Hazardous-drug manipulation | Lower | Higher |
| Dose flexibility | Limited by prefilled strengths | Higher through withdrawal and dilution |
| Packaging complexity | Higher | Lower |
| Unit manufacturing cost | Likely higher | Generally lower |
| Waste risk | Depends on available strengths | Depends on vial size and dose |
| Differentiation potential | High | Limited |
| Device regulatory burden | Higher | Lower |
| Hospital workflow value | Strong | Conventional |
The prefilled syringe has a credible premium position only if it reduces total treatment cost or handling risk. A higher acquisition price without measurable workflow savings will be difficult to defend against vial-based generics.
What patent litigation and Paragraph IV risks affect idarubicin?
Because idarubicin is an old small molecule, the principal Paragraph IV risk is not a challenge to a new active ingredient. It is a challenge to any later-listed formulation, device or method-of-use patent.
Potential Paragraph IV targets could include:
- prefilled-syringe configurations;
- stability claims;
- container-material claims;
- light-protection systems;
- dosing regimens;
- combination therapy methods; and
- manufacturing processes.
A generic applicant could avoid some formulation patents by using a conventional vial, a different syringe material or a different packaging configuration. A patent estate that covers only a narrow PFS architecture may therefore protect a premium presentation but not the broader idarubicin market.
No biosimilar litigation pathway applies. Any litigation would arise under the Hatch-Waxman framework or conventional patent law, not under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
What FDA regulatory strategy applies to an improved Idamycin PFS?
The regulatory route depends on the degree of change.
ANDA strategy
An ANDA is most appropriate for a product that matches the reference product in:
- active ingredient;
- strength;
- dosage form;
- route of administration;
- labeling, subject to permitted differences; and
- relevant quality attributes.
A generic applicant seeking a prefilled syringe must also address device constituent requirements and human-factors considerations where applicable.
505(b)(2) strategy
A 505(b)(2) application may be more suitable for:
- a new concentration;
- a materially different excipient system;
- a novel syringe or administration device;
- a new stability profile;
- a new route or dosing regimen; or
- a formulation supported partly by FDA findings for the listed drug.
A 505(b)(2) product can create greater differentiation but may face listed-patent certification, clinical bridging and additional CMC requirements.
How strong is the patent estate for Idamycin PFS?
The underlying idarubicin patent estate is weak as an exclusivity barrier because the active ingredient and conventional injectable use are mature. A new commercial platform could build a stronger, narrower estate around the following combination:
- a defined idarubicin concentration;
- a controlled pH and impurity profile;
- a specified syringe material;
- a validated closure and lubricant system;
- light-protective packaging;
- extended stability; and
- a hazardous-drug transfer or administration method.
The strength of such an estate would depend on comparative data showing an unexpected result, such as materially lower degradation, reduced adsorption, improved syringe performance or a meaningful reduction in preparation time.
Composition-only protection is likely to be less durable than integrated formulation, container and process protection.
Key Takeaways
- Idamycin PFS is a preservative-free aqueous idarubicin hydrochloride injection using sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid and water for injection.
- The excipient system is conventional and unlikely to support broad standalone patent protection.
- The strongest commercial opportunities are in ready-to-use administration, hazardous-drug handling, container compatibility, dose flexibility and supply reliability.
- Idarubicin is a mature small molecule with no biosimilar risk and limited legacy exclusivity value.
- Generic competition is the main market threat.
- A conventional generic can likely pursue an ANDA, while a materially differentiated syringe or formulation may require a 505(b)(2) strategy.
- The best patent position would combine formulation, syringe materials, stability, packaging and administration-system claims.
- Commercial success depends on hospital workflow savings, not only on excipient novelty.
FAQs
Is Idamycin PFS the same as idarubicin injection?
Idamycin PFS is a prefilled-syringe presentation of idarubicin hydrochloride injection. Vial-based idarubicin products contain the same active ingredient but may differ in container, dose flexibility and pharmacy preparation requirements.
Does Idamycin PFS contain benzyl alcohol or another preservative?
The labeled formulation is described as a preservative-free aqueous solution using sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid and water for injection.[1]
Can a generic company change the excipients in idarubicin injection?
A generic applicant generally must establish equivalence to the reference product. A material excipient change can affect the ANDA strategy and may require additional CMC, stability, compatibility or regulatory justification.
Is a liposomal idarubicin formulation an obvious commercial extension?
Not necessarily. A liposomal product would have different pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, manufacturing controls and clinical requirements. It would compete as a differentiated formulation rather than as a simple generic equivalent.
What is the most valuable improvement to an idarubicin prefilled syringe?
The highest-value improvement is likely a validated system that reduces hazardous-drug preparation and administration steps while maintaining dose accuracy, stability, container compatibility and reliable hospital supply.
References
- DailyMed. (n.d.). Idarubicin hydrochloride injection prescribing information. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations: Orange Book.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: FDA-approved drugs.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Abbreviated new drug application submissions: Refuse-to-receive standards.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Container closure systems for packaging human drugs and biologics: Chemistry, manufacturing, and controls documentation.
More… ↓
Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing
Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.
Alerts Available With Subscription
Alerts are available for users with active subscriptions.
Visit the Subscription Options page for details on plans and pricing.
ISSN: 2162-2639

Privacy and Cookies
Terms & Conditions
Site Map
DrugPatentWatch Alternatives
LOE / Generic Entry Opportunies 2026 - 2027
NCE-1 Patent Challenge Dates 2026 - 2027
Friedman, Yali. "DrugPatentWatch" DrugPatentWatch, thinkBiotech, 2026, www.DrugPatentWatch.com.
See Primary Research Papers Citing DrugPatentWatch
Access the Complete Database
BioPharmaceutical Business Intelligence
- Identify first generic entrants
- Uncover prior art in expired and abandoned patents
- Drug patents in 130+ countries