You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

List of Excipients in Branded Drug FASENRA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities for FASENRA

Last updated: March 5, 2026

FASENRA (benralizumab) is a monoclonal antibody developed by AstraZeneca for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Its formulation relies on specific excipients that impact stability, delivery, and patient compliance. Optimizing excipient selection offers pathways to enhanced product stability, reduced manufacturing costs, and broader market access.

What Excipients Are Used in FASENRA Formulation?

FASENRA’s formulated solution primarily consists of:

  • Histidine buffer (pH 5.5)
  • Sucrose (stabilizer)
  • Polysorbate 80 (surfactant)
  • Water for injection

These excipients preserve the antibody’s stability during storage and administration.

How Do Excipient Choices Affect FASENRA’s Stability and Delivery?

Proper excipient selection impacts:

  • Protein stability: Sucrose provides osmotic balance and prevents aggregation.
  • Degradation prevention: Histidine buffer maintains pH, reducing antibody denaturation.
  • Reduced aggregation: Polysorbate 80 minimizes surface adsorption and protein aggregation during manufacturing and storage.

Changes to excipient ratios or substitution with alternative stabilizers can improve thermal stability or extend shelf-life.

What Are the Commercial Opportunities Linked to Excipient Optimization?

1. Extending Shelf-Life

Research indicates that adjusting excipients—such as replacing sucrose with trehalose or implementing lyophilization—can improve stability at higher temperatures. Extending shelf life reduces logistics costs and expands distribution in emerging markets with limited cold chain infrastructure.

2. Developing Alternative Delivery Methods

Formulating with different excipients can facilitate new administration routes, such as subcutaneous prefilled syringes or inhalation devices, increasing patient convenience and adherence.

3. Cost Reduction and Manufacturing Efficiency

Replacing high-cost excipients with cost-effective alternatives, like generic surfactants, can lower production costs. Stabilization strategies that permit simplified storage conditions reduce logistical complexity.

4. Biosimilar Development and Market Penetration

Biosimilar competitors seek formulations with equivalent stability profiles. Proprietary excipient formulations can serve as barriers to entry or enable differentiation in biosimilar pipelines.

5. Regulatory and Patent Strategies

Innovating excipient compositions may lead to new patent filings, providing exclusivity opportunities. Regulatory agencies often approve excipient changes based on demonstrated equivalence, opening pathways for commercial expansion.

What Are the Risks and Challenges in Excipient Optimization?

  • Regulatory hurdles: Changes in excipient composition require extensive stability and safety data.
  • Compatibility issues: Alternative excipients may interact differently with the protein or delivery device.
  • Cost-benefit balance: Investment in reformulation must justify potential market gains.
  • Patent restrictions: Existing patents on excipients or formulations limit the scope for proprietary modifications.

How Does the Competitive Landscape Limit or Enable Opportunities?

The market for monoclonal antibody therapies includes firms exploring excipient innovations, such as:

  • Novartis with biosimilar adalimumab formulations,
  • Amgen developing stability-enhanced formulations,
  • Biotech startups focusing on novel stabilizers or delivery systems.

Key differentiators include formulation stability, patient convenience, and cost efficiency.

What Are the Future Directions for Excipient Strategy in FASENRA?

The focus is shifting toward:

  • Lyophilized formulations: For extended shelf life and cold chain independence.
  • Alternative stabilizers: Such as sugars or amino acids that improve thermal stability.
  • Delivery system integration: Combining excipient innovations with device development for auto-injectors and inhalers.

Collaborations across R&D, manufacturing, and regulatory domains are essential for translating formulation improvements into commercial success.

Key Takeaways

  • FASENRA’s current formulation uses sucrose, histidine buffer, and polysorbate 80 to maintain stability.
  • Excipient modifications can improve shelf life, enable alternative delivery, and reduce costs.
  • Innovation in excipient strategy creates opportunities for product differentiation, regulatory approval, and market expansion.
  • Risks include regulatory complexity, compatibility issues, and patent constraints.
  • Future efforts focus on lyophilized formulations, novel stabilizers, and integrated delivery systems.

FAQs

1. How can excipient changes impact FASENRA’s patent portfolio?
Excipient modifications may be patented if they demonstrate novel stability or delivery benefits, potentially extending exclusivity.

2. What are the regulatory considerations for excipient optimization?
Any formulation change requires stability testing, safety assessments, and approval applications to agencies like the FDA or EMA.

3. Can excipient strategies reduce manufacturing costs for FASENRA?
Yes. Using cost-effective stabilizers or simplifying storage conditions can lower production and logistics expenses.

4. Is there potential for FASENRA to be reformulated as a dry powder?
Yes. Lyophilized forms with optimized excipients facilitate room-temperature storage and easier distribution.

5. Who are key competitors in excipient innovation for monoclonal antibody therapies?
Novartis, Amgen, and startups specializing in biopharmaceutical excipients drive innovation in this area.


References

[1] AstraZeneca. (2022). FASENRA (benralizumab) prescribing information. Retrieved from https://www.azpicentral.com/fasenra/fasenra.pdf

[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2021). Guidance for Industry: Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies Submitted in NDA or IND Applications.

[3] Chirmule, N., & Soman, G. (2018). Protein formulation development for monoclonal antibodies. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 19(7), 582-593.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.