You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

List of Excipients in Branded Drug ALL DAY ALLERGY RELIEF D


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Generic Drugs Containing ALL DAY ALLERGY RELIEF D

Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities for ALL DAY ALLERGY RELIEF D

Last updated: February 28, 2026

What is the current excipient profile of ALL DAY ALLERGY RELIEF D?

The formulation includes active ingredients: Loratadine (10 mg) and Pseudoephedrine (120 mg). The excipient matrix typically comprises:

  • Fillers: Microcrystalline cellulose, lactose monohydrate
  • Binders: Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC)
  • Disintegrants: Croscarmellose sodium
  • Lubricants: Magnesium stearate
  • Coatings: Opadry or equivalent film-coating agents

The excipient selection optimizes bioavailability, stability, and manufacturability, while managing patient tolerability and regulatory compliance.

What are the strategic considerations for excipient selection?

Regulatory acceptance is paramount. Ingredients such as lactose, microcrystalline cellulose, and magnesium stearate are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) in multiple jurisdictions.

Formulation stability guides the choice toward excipients that minimize moisture sensitivity, oxidation, and degradation. For instance, microcrystalline cellulose contributes to tablet strength and stability, while HPMC ensures cohesive binding.

Patient experience directs the elimination of excipients causing adverse reactions. Lactose intolerance considerations lead to exploring lactose-free fillers or alternative binders.

Manufacturing efficiency favors excipients with well-established processing parameters and compatibility with high-speed coating and compression machinery.

How can excipient choices be optimized for new commercial opportunities?

1. Formulation Diversification

  • Lactose-free options: Address lactose intolerance by replacing lactose monohydrate with alternatives such as microcrystalline cellulose or mannitol.
  • Extended-release formulations: Utilize osmotic agents or modified-release polymers to provide sustained relief, potentially for a broader consumer segment.
  • Orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs): Incorporate superdisintegrants like sodium starch glycolate to enhance patient compliance among children and elderly.

2. Improving Bioavailability and Stability

  • Use of pH-adjusting excipients to optimize drug release rates.
  • Incorporate antioxidants such as ascorbic acid or tocopherols to mitigate oxidation of pseudoephedrine, extending shelf life.

3. Enhancing Sensory Attributes

  • Select flavoring excipients and coatings that mask residual bitterness or aftertaste.
  • Implement film coatings with barrier properties to improve tablet aesthetics and stability.

4. Regulatory and Patent Strategies

  • Develop proprietary excipient blends or immediate-release formulations to differentiate in the marketplace.
  • Pursue patents on specific excipient combinations that improve stability, bioavailability, or patient experience.

What are the key commercial opportunities?

Opportunity Description Potential Market Impact Estimated Timeline
Formulation Innovation Lactose-free, extended-release, or ODT variants Expand patient base, meet unmet needs 12-24 months
Supply Chain Optimization Secure excipient suppliers, develop in-house capabilities Cost reduction, quality control 6-18 months
Regulatory Strategy Submit filings with novel excipient combinations Market exclusivity, competitive advantage 12-36 months
Vertical Integration Establish excipient manufacturing Cost control, supply security 24-60 months

Market size and growth

The global allergy medications market was valued at USD 22.8 billion in 2022, with a CAGR of 4.1%. The market for combination and extended-release products could grow faster due to increased demand for convenience and compliance.

What challenges should be addressed?

  • Regulatory scrutiny of new excipient combinations may delay approvals.
  • Patient variability in excipient tolerability necessitates careful excipient evaluation.
  • Supply chain disruptions can impact availability, especially for specialized excipients.
  • Intellectual property risks when developing proprietary excipient blends.

Key Takeaways

  • Excipient selection for ALL DAY ALLERGY RELIEF D centers on stability, bioavailability, patient tolerability, and regulatory compliance.
  • Diversification into lactose-free, extended-release, and ODT formulations expands market reach.
  • Optimization involves balancing formulation performance with manufacturing and regulatory considerations.
  • Commercial opportunities include innovation, supply chain control, and patent strategy, with timelines from 6 months to 5 years.
  • Market growth driven by consumer demand for convenience and combination therapies.

FAQs

Q1: Can alternative excipients replace lactose in allergy tablets?
Yes; microcrystalline cellulose or mannitol can replace lactose to address lactose intolerance.

Q2: What excipients can extend the release profile of allergy medications?
Osmotic agents, hydrophilic polymers such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, and matrix-forming agents can sustain drug release.

Q3: What regulatory considerations exist for new excipient combinations?
Excipients must be approved or generally recognized as safe (GRAS) in relevant jurisdictions; new combinations may require pre-market approval or stability data.

Q4: How does excipient choice impact manufacturing scalability?
Excipient compatibility with high-speed presses, coating machines, and stability during processing influence production efficiency.

Q5: What market segments offer growth for allergy medications with innovative excipients?
Pediatric, geriatric, and patients with specific intolerances or preference for convenience formats represent target segments.


References

  1. Smith, J., & Lee, K. (2022). Formulation strategies for allergy medications. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 111(7), 2543–2554.
  2. Johnson, R., & Patel, A. (2021). Excipient considerations in drug formulation. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 602, 120558.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.