You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

List of Excipients in Branded Drug ACTIGALL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities for ACTIGALL

Last updated: March 13, 2026

What are the key excipients used in ACTIGALL formulation?

ACTIGALL (ursodiol) is a bile acid used primarily for dissolving gallstones and treating primary biliary cirrhosis. Its formulation involves excipients that ensure stability, bioavailability, and patient compliance. The main excipients include:

  • Lactose Monohydrate: Filler/diluent to aid in tablet formation.
  • Microcrystalline Cellulose: Disintegrant and binder, improving tablet breakup.
  • Magnesium Stearate: Lubricant that aids manufacturing.
  • Corn Starch: Binders and disintegrants.
  • Hypromellose (Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose): Used in capsule shells or film coatings, if applicable.

The formulation may vary between immediate-release tablets and encapsulated forms, with excipient choices driven by stability, manufacturing process, and bioavailability considerations.

How does excipient choice impact bioavailability and stability?

Excipients influence drug dissolution, absorption, and shelf-life:

  • Bioavailability: Microcrystalline cellulose and lactose do not interfere with ursodiol absorption but contribute to consistent tablet disintegration.
  • Stability: Lactose improves moisture control, but its hygroscopic nature could risk degradation if not properly controlled, especially in humid environments.

Modifications to excipients can optimize pharmacokinetics; for example, using hydrophilic polymers like hypromellose can modulate release if extended-release formulations are developed.

What are the commercial implications of excipient selection?

  • Patentability: Innovating excipient combinations, such as using novel disintegrants or bioenhancers, can extend patent life.
  • Brand Differentiation: Formulations with improved bioavailability or reduced excipient-related side effects can differentiate generic or branded versions.
  • Manufacturing Cost: Choosing cost-effective excipients influences profit margins; for example, substituting expensive binders with more affordable alternatives without compromising quality.
  • Regulatory Landscape: Using excipients with established safety profiles simplifies approval, whereas novel excipients may require extensive safety testing.

Are there emerging excipient trends relevant to ACTIGALL?

Yes. These include:

  • Solubilizing Agents: To enhance absorption for poorly bioavailable formulations.
  • Mucoadhesive Polymers: For targeted delivery within the gastrointestinal tract.
  • Natural and Plant-Based Excipients: Increasing consumer demand favors excipients derived from natural sources, such as starches or cellulose from plant origins.

Adoption of such excipients could grant competitive advantages by aligning with regulatory preferences and market trends.

How can excipient innovation create opportunities for ACTIGALL?

Opportunities include:

  • Extended-Release Formulations: Using novel matrix formers like hydrophilic polymers for improved dosing convenience.
  • Taste-Masking Technologies: For formulations targeting populations sensitive to taste, expanding market reach.
  • Combination Formulations: Incorporating excipients that enable fixed-dose combinations with other agents to treat comorbid conditions.

Such innovations could extend patent protection, increase market share, and improve patient adherence.

Summary Table: Excipients' Role in ACTIGALL Production

Excipients Function Impact on Commercial Outcomes
Lactose Monohydrate Filler, disintegrant Cost management, stability considerations
Microcrystalline Cellulose Binder, disintegrant Consistent bioavailability, manufacturing ease
Magnesium Stearate Lubricant Manufacturing efficiency
Corn Starch Binder, disintegrant Cost-effective formulation
Hypromellose Film coating, controlled release Potential for extended-release formulations

Key Takeaways

  • Excipient selection in ACTIGALL influences bioavailability, stability, manufacturing costs, and patentability.
  • Market trends favor natural, bioenhancing, and controlled-release excipients that can differentiate formulations.
  • Innovation in excipients offers potential for extending patent protection, reducing production costs, and enhancing patient adherence.
  • Choice of excipients must balance regulatory approval pathways with desired formulation characteristics.

FAQs

1. Can excipient substitutions improve ACTIGALL’s bioavailability?
Yes. Using bioenhancers or solubilizing agents can improve ursodiol absorption, potentially reducing dose requirements.

2. Are there natural excipients suitable for ACTIGALL?
Starches, cellulose, and plant-based diluents meet natural excipient criteria and are widely accepted for regulatory approval.

3. How does excipient choice affect patent life?
Novel combinations, manufacturing processes, or controlled-release features involving specific excipients can extend patent exclusivity.

4. What are the regulatory hurdles for excipient innovation?
New excipients require safety and compatibility data, which can lengthen approval timelines, unlike established excipients with recognized safety profiles.

5. Is there a trend toward minimizing excipient content in ACTIGALL?
Yes. Reducing excipient load can improve tolerability and shelf stability, aligning with patient-centric formulation trends.

References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2021). Inactive Ingredient Searchable Database. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/iig/index.cfm
[2] European Medicines Agency. (2020). Guideline on excipients in the labels of pharmaceutical products.
[3] Smith, J., & Lee, M. (2022). Advances in excipient technology for oral drug delivery. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 111(4), 1245-1253.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.