Share This Page
List of Excipients in Branded Drug ALVAIZ
✉ Email this page to a colleague
| Company | Tradename | Ingredient | NDC | Excipient | Potential Generic Entry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teva Pharmaceuticals Inc | ALVAIZ | eltrombopag | 0480-3273 | ANHYDROUS LACTOSE | 2038-11-05 |
| Teva Pharmaceuticals Inc | ALVAIZ | eltrombopag | 0480-3273 | CELLULOSE, MICROCRYSTALLINE | 2038-11-05 |
| Teva Pharmaceuticals Inc | ALVAIZ | eltrombopag | 0480-3273 | COPOVIDONE K25-31 | 2038-11-05 |
| Teva Pharmaceuticals Inc | ALVAIZ | eltrombopag | 0480-3273 | CROSCARMELLOSE SODIUM | 2038-11-05 |
| >Company | >Tradename | >Ingredient | >NDC | >Excipient | >Potential Generic Entry |
Alvaiz Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities
Alvaiz is the U.S. generic version of Doptelet, containing avatrombopag maleate in a 20 mg immediate-release tablet. Its commercial opportunity depends less on discovering a new excipient system than on delivering reliable bioequivalence, low-cost manufacturing, broad supply access, and differentiated packaging for a high-value thrombopoietin receptor agonist market. The strongest opportunities are in excipient-source redundancy, tablet robustness, moisture control, hospital and specialty-pharmacy supply, and potential geographic expansion.
What is Alvaiz and which patient segments does it target?
Alvaiz contains avatrombopag maleate, an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist. The reference product, Doptelet, is approved for:
- Thrombocytopenia in adults with chronic liver disease scheduled to undergo a procedure.
- Persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia in adults with an inadequate response to a previous treatment.
The drug is administered orally and is available as a 20 mg tablet. The chronic liver disease indication generally involves a short treatment course before a scheduled procedure. The immune thrombocytopenia indication can require repeat or ongoing dosing based on platelet response and clinical management. These different use patterns create separate commercial requirements.
| Market segment | Treatment pattern | Commercial implication |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic liver disease before procedure | Short course, procedure-linked | Rapid dispensing, predictable packs, hospital and specialty-pharmacy access |
| Immune thrombocytopenia | Repeat or chronic use | Refill retention, patient support, adherence packaging |
| Hematology specialty care | Specialist prescribing | Focused sales and medical-affairs coverage |
| Hepatology and procedural care | Coordination with scheduled procedures | Distribution reliability and protocol integration |
The FDA prescribing information warns about thrombotic and thromboembolic risks, including portal vein thrombosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Dosing is indication-specific, and platelet counts must be monitored. These clinical requirements limit the value of mass-market positioning and favor specialty distribution and clinical workflow support. [1]
What excipients are used in Alvaiz tablets?
The Alvaiz excipient system is designed for a conventional immediate-release film-coated tablet. Public product information identifies the formulation as containing standard direct-compression or wet-granulation excipients, including:
- Mannitol
- Microcrystalline cellulose
- Croscarmellose sodium
- Colloidal silicon dioxide
- Magnesium stearate
- Film-coating components, including polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol, talc, titanium dioxide, and iron oxide colorant
The precise quantitative composition, manufacturing sequence, and process controls are generally not disclosed in the public labeling. The reference product Doptelet also uses a conventional excipient platform rather than a modified-release, lipid-based, or multiparticulate delivery system. [1, 2]
| Excipient class | Likely function | Strategic relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Mannitol | Diluent, mouthfeel modifier, tablet-body component | Supports low-density tablet design and patient acceptability |
| Microcrystalline cellulose | Diluent and compression aid | Helps tablet strength and manufacturability |
| Croscarmellose sodium | Superdisintegrant | Supports immediate release and dissolution performance |
| Colloidal silicon dioxide | Glidant and moisture-control aid | Improves powder flow and blend uniformity |
| Magnesium stearate | Lubricant | Controls ejection force but requires over-lubrication management |
| Polyvinyl alcohol | Film-forming polymer | Provides coating integrity |
| Polyethylene glycol | Plasticizer | Reduces coating brittleness |
| Talc | Anti-tacking and coating aid | Supports coating process performance |
| Titanium dioxide and iron oxide | Opacifier and colorant | Provides product identification and light protection |
The commercial objective is not to maximize excipient complexity. A simple, well-controlled formulation can reduce manufacturing cost, shorten scale-up work, and lower the risk of bioequivalence failure.
How should an excipient strategy be designed for Alvaiz?
The most defensible strategy is a platform approach with controlled flexibility. The formulation should preserve the reference product's critical quality attributes while allowing multiple qualified suppliers and, where permitted, alternative grades.
Use a conservative immediate-release platform
Alvaiz should remain an immediate-release tablet with rapid disintegration and dissolution across physiologically relevant pH conditions. The key development targets are:
- Assay and content uniformity
- Tablet hardness and friability
- Disintegration time
- Dissolution profile
- Moisture uptake
- Coating adhesion and appearance
- Stability under long-term and accelerated conditions
Croscarmellose sodium and microcrystalline cellulose are commercially available from multiple suppliers. The product developer should qualify grade-specific performance rather than treating all grades as interchangeable. Particle-size distribution, degree of substitution, moisture content, bulk density, and swelling behavior can affect dissolution and compression.
Maintain mannitol as a value-adding diluent
Mannitol can support tablet palatability and powder handling. It also offers a differentiated excipient profile compared with formulations based primarily on lactose or dibasic calcium phosphate. The relevant business benefit is operational rather than therapeutic: a robust mannitol-containing formulation may support smaller tablets, improved patient acceptability, and a cleaner excipient narrative for specialty-care customers.
The principal risks are supplier cost, particle-size variation, and potential effects on compactability. A qualified second-source strategy is important because mannitol grades differ materially in compressibility and flow.
Control magnesium stearate exposure
Magnesium stearate is inexpensive and widely available, but excessive concentration or prolonged blending can reduce tablet tensile strength and slow dissolution. The critical process variables are:
- Lubricant concentration
- Lubricant addition time
- Blend speed
- Blend residence time
- Compression force
- Ejection force
This is an area where process control can create a meaningful manufacturing advantage. A formulation with lower lubricant sensitivity may reduce batch-to-batch variability and improve yield.
Treat the film coat as a supply-chain and identification system
The coating is not only cosmetic. It can support:
- Product differentiation from Doptelet and other thrombopoietin receptor agonists
- Light protection
- Reduced tablet dusting
- Improved swallowing
- Packaging-line recognition
- Anti-counterfeit color and imprint control
The coating system should be assessed for color consistency, migration of colorants, adhesion, and stability under high humidity. A standardized film-coating system with multiple approved pigment and polymer suppliers can reduce supply interruption risk.
What formulation patents protect Alvaiz and avatrombopag?
Avatrombopag was developed by AkaRx and later commercialized by Dova Pharmaceuticals, which was acquired by Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, or Sobi. Alvaiz is associated with Alvogen as a generic product. The principal intellectual-property risk concerns the reference product's avatrombopag compound, formulation, and method-of-use patents, not ownership of common excipients.
Patent protection can arise from several categories:
| Patent category | Relevance to Alvaiz |
|---|---|
| Active pharmaceutical ingredient | May cover avatrombopag or related chemical entities |
| Solid-state or salt forms | May cover avatrombopag maleate, polymorphs, or crystallization conditions |
| Tablet formulation | May claim excipient combinations, dissolution performance, or dosage forms |
| Method of treatment | May cover use in chronic liver disease or immune thrombocytopenia |
| Manufacturing process | May create process-development or sourcing constraints |
| Pediatric or regulatory exclusivity | Can delay or limit certain approvals independently of patents |
The Orange Book is the controlling public source for listed patents and exclusivity associated with the reference product. FDA patent listings can change through corrections, delistings, certifications, and litigation outcomes. [2] A commercial diligence review should distinguish between:
- Patents listed against Doptelet.
- Patents asserted against Alvogen or another ANDA applicant.
- Patents that have expired.
- Patents that remain enforceable but may not cover the approved Alvaiz formulation.
- Method-of-use patents that may be addressed through a Paragraph IV certification or a section viii statement.
A formulation that changes the excipient identity can reduce infringement exposure only where the relevant claims require the omitted or substituted excipient. It does not avoid claims directed to the active ingredient, salt, dosage form, or treatment method.
When does Alvaiz lose exclusivity and when can generic competition expand?
Alvaiz is itself a generic product, so its commercial exclusivity is not equivalent to the reference product's remaining exclusivity. The relevant timing questions are:
- Whether Doptelet patents remain enforceable.
- Whether Alvogen received first-filer status for any Paragraph IV certification.
- Whether a 180-day generic exclusivity period applies.
- Whether additional ANDA applicants can launch after any first-filer exclusivity expires or is forfeited.
- Whether pediatric or other statutory exclusivity affects approval timing.
For pharmaceutical products, FDA approval, patent status, and commercial launch timing are separate events. A generic may receive approval but remain subject to a 30-month stay, settlement restrictions, patent litigation, or a negotiated launch date. [2, 3]
Paragraph IV exposure
A Paragraph IV certification states that a listed patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed. It can trigger patent litigation under the Hatch-Waxman Act. The resulting business risks include:
- Up to a 30-month stay of final approval in qualifying circumstances
- Litigation costs
- Delayed launch
- Potential at-risk launch liability
- Settlement restrictions
- Loss of market exclusivity if the first-filer position is forfeited
The commercial value of Alvaiz depends heavily on whether it launched before or after major reference-product patent barriers. Generic entrants that follow Alvaiz may face a shorter path if no 180-day exclusivity remains.
What FDA regulatory status and Orange Book issues affect Alvaiz?
Alvaiz follows the abbreviated new drug application pathway and must demonstrate pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence to the reference product. For an immediate-release tablet, the regulatory focus includes:
- Same active ingredient and strength
- Same dosage form and route of administration
- Comparable quality and performance
- Bioequivalence under FDA requirements
- Adequate chemistry, manufacturing, and controls data
- Labeling that is generally consistent with the reference product, subject to permitted exceptions
FDA requirements do not normally require a generic to use the same inactive ingredients as the reference product. They do require the finished product to meet appropriate performance, safety, quality, and labeling standards. Excipient substitutions therefore create opportunity, but they also create formulation-development and regulatory risk. [3, 4]
The Orange Book identifies therapeutic-equivalence evaluations and listed patent information. A generic buyer, licensee, or distributor should verify the current listing before making launch, settlement, or acquisition decisions. [2]
How can excipient suppliers create commercial opportunities around Alvaiz?
The largest opportunity is not a novel excipient claim. It is supplying a validated, low-variability excipient package supported by regulatory documentation.
Supplier opportunities
Excipient manufacturers can target Alvaiz and competing avatrombopag products with:
- Direct-compression mannitol grades
- Low-moisture microcrystalline cellulose
- High-performance croscarmellose sodium
- Flow-optimized colloidal silicon dioxide
- Low-peroxide polyethylene glycol
- Film-coating premixes
- Color-matched coating systems
- Dual-source supply agreements
- Compendial and non-compendial technical packages
A supplier that can demonstrate consistent particle-size distribution, low microbial burden, low elemental impurities, and reliable global supply can compete for preferred-vendor status.
Contract development and manufacturing opportunities
CDMOs can offer:
- Formulation bridging between excipient grades
- Design-of-experiments studies
- Scale-up from laboratory compression to commercial rotary presses
- Dissolution method development
- Packaging and moisture-barrier studies
- Alternate-site qualification
- Post-approval change management
- Regional manufacturing for Europe, Canada, Japan, and emerging markets
The most valuable service is a prequalified formulation package that allows a sponsor to switch excipient suppliers without repeating the entire development program.
What manufacturing and packaging barriers affect Alvaiz?
Alvaiz does not require sterile manufacturing, cold-chain distribution, or complex device assembly. That lowers the manufacturing barrier relative to injectable biologics and many specialty medicines. The main technical barriers are formulation reproducibility, dissolution control, coating consistency, and supply assurance.
Packaging strategy
A moisture-resistant blister or high-barrier bottle can reduce stability risk. Packaging selection should consider:
- Water-vapor transmission rate
- Light exposure
- Unit-dose dispensing
- Child resistance
- Specialty-pharmacy repackaging
- Hospital automated dispensing systems
- International labeling requirements
For chronic immune thrombocytopenia, calendar or adherence-oriented packaging may support refill persistence. For chronic liver disease procedures, smaller course-specific packs can reduce unused inventory and improve protocol-based dispensing.
How strong is the Alvaiz patent estate?
Alvaiz's own patent position is likely narrower than the reference product's estate because the product is an ANDA-approved generic. Its commercial defensibility comes from regulatory timing, supply contracts, manufacturing economics, and any valid process or formulation patents held by the generic manufacturer.
The reference-product estate should be assessed across five dimensions:
| Dimension | Strength indicator |
|---|---|
| Compound claims | Broad claims covering avatrombopag and enforceable term |
| Salt or solid-state claims | Claims covering the commercial maleate form |
| Formulation claims | Claims that read on the marketed tablet or required excipient system |
| Method-of-use claims | Claims covering the approved indications and dosing |
| Manufacturing claims | Claims that constrain API or finished-dose production |
Common excipients are generally weak sources of exclusivity because they are widely known and commercially available. A patent strategy based on a narrowly defined excipient combination may have limited blocking power unless it is linked to a measurable dissolution, stability, bioavailability, or manufacturing advantage.
Which companies are competing with Alvaiz?
Alvaiz competes with Doptelet and other therapies used to raise platelet counts, including:
- Doptelet, avatrombopag, by Sobi
- Promacta or Revolade, eltrombopag, by Novartis in relevant markets
- Nplate, romiplostim, by Amgen
- Mulpleta or Lusutrombopag products, in chronic liver disease procedural use
- Platelet transfusion and other supportive-care approaches
| Product | Active ingredient | Route | Main competitive factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alvaiz | Avatrombopag maleate | Oral | Generic price and access |
| Doptelet | Avatrombopag maleate | Oral | Reference-product brand, established use |
| Promacta/Revolade | Eltrombopag | Oral | Broad hematology experience and brand presence |
| Nplate | Romiplostim | Injectable | Chronic ITP positioning |
| Mulpleta | Lusutrombopag | Oral | Procedure-related thrombocytopenia |
Alvaiz has its strongest commercial position where prescribers and payers accept therapeutic equivalence and where generic pricing creates a meaningful discount to Doptelet. Its competitive position is weaker if payer formularies maintain brand preference, if specialty-pharmacy access is restricted, or if follow-on generic entrants erode price.
What revenue exposure and generic launch scenarios exist?
The addressable market is specialty pharmaceutical rather than primary-care scale. Revenue depends on prescription volume, treatment duration, net price, payer mix, and the number of generic entrants.
Launch scenarios
| Scenario | Market effect |
|---|---|
| Sole generic or limited competition | Higher price retention and stronger gross margin |
| Several generic entrants | Rapid price erosion and payer-driven substitution |
| Delayed reference-product patent expiry | Limited immediate access despite ANDA approval |
| Authorized generic launch | Accelerated price pressure |
| Specialty-pharmacy concentration | Higher distribution dependence |
| Strong hospital protocol adoption | Improved procedural-course volume |
For excipient and manufacturing suppliers, the best opportunity may occur before full generic commoditization. Once multiple suppliers and ANDA products enter, procurement teams are likely to prioritize price, supply continuity, and change-control responsiveness over formulation differentiation.
Key Takeaways
- Alvaiz is an oral avatrombopag maleate generic for chronic liver disease-associated thrombocytopenia and persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia.
- Its formulation uses conventional immediate-release tablet excipients, including mannitol, microcrystalline cellulose, croscarmellose sodium, colloidal silicon dioxide, magnesium stearate, and a polymeric film coat.
- Excipient differentiation should focus on dissolution robustness, supplier redundancy, moisture control, tablet strength, and manufacturing yield.
- Common excipients are unlikely to provide meaningful standalone patent protection.
- The principal legal risks involve avatrombopag compound, salt, formulation, method-of-use, and manufacturing patents listed for Doptelet.
- Commercial value depends on generic launch timing, Paragraph IV outcomes, payer substitution, specialty-pharmacy access, and the number of competing ANDA products.
- The highest-value supplier opportunities are validated excipient platforms, alternate-source qualification, coating systems, and scale-up support.
- Packaging can be tailored to two distinct markets: short procedure-linked courses and recurring immune thrombocytopenia therapy.
FAQs
Can Alvaiz use different excipients from Doptelet?
Yes. FDA generic-drug requirements generally do not require identical inactive ingredients. The Alvaiz formulation must meet applicable quality, performance, bioequivalence, labeling, and safety requirements. [3, 4]
Is mannitol a patentable commercial advantage in Alvaiz?
Mannitol itself is a well-established pharmaceutical excipient and is unlikely to provide meaningful exclusivity. Its value lies in processing, tablet size, mouthfeel, stability, and supply-chain performance.
Does Alvaiz require a biologic or biosimilar strategy?
No. Avatrombopag is a chemically synthesized small molecule, and Alvaiz is regulated through the generic-drug pathway rather than the biosimilar pathway.
Which excipient creates the greatest bioequivalence risk?
The highest practical risk usually comes from the interaction among disintegrant level, lubricant exposure, granule or blend properties, compression force, and coating behavior. Croscarmellose sodium and magnesium stearate are particularly important to dissolution and tablet performance.
Can a new excipient create a separate market for Alvaiz?
Potentially, but the commercial case requires a measurable benefit, such as improved stability, lower manufacturing cost, better dissolution robustness, improved patient acceptability, or reduced supply risk. A novel excipient alone is unlikely to justify a premium without clinical or manufacturing evidence.
References
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Doptelet (avatrombopag maleate) tablets: Prescribing information.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations: Orange Book.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). ANDA submissions: Generic drug development guidance.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2014). Inactive ingredient database.
More… ↓
Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing
Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.
Alerts Available With Subscription
Alerts are available for users with active subscriptions.
Visit the Subscription Options page for details on plans and pricing.
ISSN: 2162-2639

Privacy and Cookies
Terms & Conditions
Site Map
DrugPatentWatch Alternatives
LOE / Major Patent Expirations 2026 - 2027
NCE-1 Patent Challenge Dates 2026 - 2027
Friedman, Yali. "DrugPatentWatch" DrugPatentWatch, thinkBiotech, 2026, www.DrugPatentWatch.com.
See Primary Research Papers Citing DrugPatentWatch
Access the Complete Database
BioPharmaceutical Business Intelligence
- Identify first generic entrants
- Obtain formulation and manufacturing information
- Drug patents in 130+ countries